This statement is backed by the article, Women in Prison: Sexual Misconduct by Correctional Staff, which tells of research done in 1999 about how sexual misconduct is treated when it comes about. This article states that less than twenty percent of allegations are proven (GAO 1999). Sexual misconduct can be considered a lack of ethics, which are defined as “moral principles (Byers 2002.)” In the GAO article, there is research done to find out how allegations have been handled and for many of those allegations there was not any proof that any sexual misconduct had happened. This lack of evidence was the main reason some of the people accused of the misconduct were not punished. It was also learned that some of the correctional staff would resign or leave after accusations. This seems to say that they knew they were doing wrong. During the research, it was learned that there was not proper training on how to deal with sexual misconduct. If there was not proper training in that field, then there was most likely no specific moral or ethical training. If there were stronger and more persistent ethical training, then some misconduct could be …show more content…
In Criminal Justice Ethics, the example from the film Dirty Harry. In this film, instead of usually moral and ethical ways to find out the location of the girl they were looking for, the officer instead tortures the suspect (p. 33). The officer in the example from earlier, with the officer trying to make the young man confess to having cocaine when he honestly did not, would be considered an officer trying to use dirty means to obtain their goal. Proper ethical training would not eliminate every bad decision made, but it would help eliminate some of the