Consequentialist Normative Theory

Improved Essays
Ethics is a set of moral principle to help people to figure out what action is right or wrong. Business ethics is every single company or business need to involved especially any business want to successful, it is a set of regulation about how a business conduct themselves legally and humanely. Moral dilemma is a problem that we need to solve usually in daily live, it means a situation has two options need to make a choice either one. Ethical theory has separate into two section there are descriptive and normative. Descriptive is describe the ethical phenomena and study on “how people do behave?” therefore normative is help human begin to distinguish the rightness and wrongness of an action and study on “how people ought to behave”. Consequentialist …show more content…
The purpose of this theory is to help the human begin to figure out what action are right and wrong. “How ought/should people to behave?” and “What is the good life for people”, these questions that normative theories attempt to answer. It deals with what should people do and should not do like murder is wrong. Besides that, donate money to charity, helping the poverty, become a volunteer for helping the people who need help in Africa, all this act is good and kind but not ethically mandatory. When doing a good act or activity must come from your heart, no other reason force you to …show more content…
It is more concern on outcome, consequence and result. The morally right action is the one that consequences will produce more benefit, see whether an action is right or wrong is depend on the result of the action, the action produces more good consequences the more right the act is. People don’t look into the act itself but look at the action’s result due to people choose an action and live as the maximize good consequences. A phrase saying that “the end justifies the mean” it tells us that if an action or goal is morally important enough, any method to achieve is acceptable even though the action is unethical. For example, a doctor has six patients, there are one patient had met accident and become brain dead another side there have five patients is witting organ donation like heart, kidney, stomach, liver, and lung for save their live and extend their lifetime, here has a decision doctor need to be made. Based on the consequentialist, the doctor should give up the patient who is brain-dead and save another five patients because the more good consequences the act produce the more right the act is, no matter what action depends on the outcome so doctors should save the five

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In consequentialism the "outcomes" of an activity are everything the activity achieves, including the activity itself. In consequentialism, the "outcomes" of an activity incorporate (a) the activity itself, and (b) everything the activity causes. What then, do these two sorts of result have in like manner, that makes them both "outcomes"? On the off chance that there is an answer, maybe it is something like this: both An itself and the things A reasons are things that happen on the off chance that you do An instead of the distinct options for…

    • 93 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Rutland model studies a dilemma from three different points of view: the consequentialist approach, which considers results; the deontological approach, which focuses on personal rights; and the aspirational approach, which considers the person whom is making the decision and who they want to be. Consequentialist Approach. The consequentialist approach, also known as Utilitarianism, studies the consequences of an outcome and considers “the greatest good for the greatest number of people without causing harm” (Ethical Toolkit, n.d.). By evaluating the overall happiness level created in response to each option will help determine which course of action to take.…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    This paper will talk about a theory known as Divine Command and the problem that hampers it which is known as the Euthypro Problem. To start off the paper, I will explain what the Divine Command Theory is and the main idea behind it. Next, I will talk about why this theory is so enticing to many people. After, I will reveal the problem with the theory called the Euthypro Problem, why it is titled Euthypro, and why it causes a problem within the theory. Later in the paper, I will discuss how the first part of the theory makes morality trivial and how it makes the concept of God always being good unimportant.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Many people have justifications for why they do certain things. Some justifications are based off of happiness, desires, god or morals. People who use happiness and desires as their justification use theories of the good. While those who use god and morals use theories of morality. Some theories that fall into the theories of morality are the divine command theory, consequentialism, and social contract theory.…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rule Utilitarianism

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Stealing to survive How would a utilitarian respond to the dilemma of stealing to survive? Utilitarianism is a normative theory and a teleological approach to morality. The theory states that motives do not matter and that the consequences are the only thing that should make you carry out an act. The foundation of utilitarianism is the Greatest Happiness Principle which has three sections.…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ethics In Criminal Justice

    • 1896 Words
    • 8 Pages

    There are numerous essential ethical theories that typically aim to understand and investigate behavior. Those theories consist of ethical relativism, ethical egoism, deontological ethics, & ontological ethics. In order to completely comprehend the aforementioned theories, case…

    • 1896 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction “WHERE’S THE BOOBIES” This paper is about women breastfeeding in public places. Breastfeeding has become one of the most controversial issues in our society today.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the last Chapter, Rachels discusses the creation of a "Satisfactory Moral Theory”, in this paper I will discuss my own creation of the Satisfactory Moral Theory. The moral theories are supposed to help us decide what are the right and wrong actions, but, not all the moral theories are perfect. We may feel that a certain conclusion to a problem is fair or unfair, but what theory do we use to make judgments?. I will start with the cultural relativism theory, to understand different cultures, There is a need to know that one community’s beliefs and practices are not usually the same as the other community. In fact, cultural relativism seems the most applicable approach to be taken on for communications purposes.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For many years there has been a debate between the opposing philosophical frameworks consequentialism and deontology. Some could argue that consequentialisms maxim of "the ends justify the means” as the determinant for a moral action may be inconsistent with other important aspects of value such as rights and allegiance. Others may argue that deontology is simply too restrictive and independent of the context in which it could be applied to. Although these two philosophical frameworks have various pros and cons associated with them, I will argue that consequentialism is the most flexible of the two frameworks. Consequentialism portrays right action in terms of intrinsic value, stating that the “action is right if…its consequences would be…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Consequentialism is the moral theory that only the consequences of actions are morally relevant. The action that has the best overall consequences would be considered the most morally right action. While ideas of what good or bad consequences are may be different, that doesn’t change the fundamental idea that the best consequences are the ones that come from the morally right action. Consequentialists must hold themselves to the exact same regard as other people, which disallows them to prioritize themselves over normal people like themselves. Consequentialism is a not correct moral principle because it is too difficult to figure out the consequences of actions compared to other as individuals.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In this paper, we are going to present an analysis regarding medical ethics, specifically Euthanasia and we will try to describe the position of a Consequentialist, Deontologist, and Virtue ethics philosophers and what their decision will be in reference to this dilemma. Subsequently we will compare and choose which position is the most appropriate to handle this ethical dilemma and explain why the others positions do not work. We will do our best to present enough evidence to support the reasoning behind our selection. Anything that involves a decision about ending a person’s life regardless of the circumstances, presents ethical dilemmas on how or why this can be done or even worse accepted.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Theory of Philosophy vs Truth of Philosophy Although, my theories of philosophy are study of true knowledge of life, views of the universe and views on religion. Could this be the truth of what is philosophy? Prior to the first day of class, my thought was religion and what exactly is philosophy. But I was looking forward to learn what it truly meant and how I can utilize the knowledge in my life.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Utilitarianism V. Pragmatism Over many centuries, ethics helped build the foundation of the laws we abide by today. Ethics are moral principles that control a person’s behavior/actions. Ethics is also known as moral philosophy, which is a branch of philosophy that rises up questions about morality. For instances, questions like is it good or bad, right or wrong, justice or crime.…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    External Ethical Issues

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Ethics can be described as an acceptable code of conduct or behaviour someone exhibits or is expected to display in a society. That behaviour is dictated by various scenarios or situations that are different in nature. For example in a company there are various ethical issues that dictate how the company runs. These ethical issues can be internal or external in nature. Internal ethical issues mainly involve the shareholders of a company, employees and the management.…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ethics is said to be the source of morals; a treatise on this, moral principles, recognized rules of conduct. The Character of a man is expressed in terms of his Conduct. Ethics thus can be considered as the source of character of a person expressed as right or wrong conduct or action. Business Ethics is not a special set of ethical rules different from ethics in general and appropriate only to business.…

    • 1667 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays