The Importance Of Drone Strikes In The United States

Improved Essays
It is difficult to say how Americans would react to China or Russia targeting and eliminating suspects with drones on American soil, especially if there was a high risk such targeting killings posed a lethal threat to innocent citizens. Those in zones with a high, or even semi-frequent, exposure to drone strikes may start to live more and more in a state of terror. China or Russia in this example certainly would not be countries whom were held in approbation, rather, it is far more likely they would be perceived with the most visceral hatred imaginable. In 2012, opinion polls reported that as many as 90 percent of Pakistanis opposed drone strikes and 74 percent considered the U.S. an enemy, despite the fact that Pakistan is one of the leading recipients of U.S. foreign aid. …show more content…
drone strikes in a Pew survey. These figures should not be surprising and they should not be ignored. While it would be juvenile, not to mention ill advised, to base domestic decisions entirely on the opinions of the international community, when attempting to conduct a worldwide manhunt, international opinions become rather important. Particularly if the policies designed to kill terrorist are to be adaptable, practical, and usable moving into the future. Cooperation with the international community is essential in the fight against terrorism, and present policies are not conducive to the long term image America must maintain across the world if it is to be successful in that

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Pearl Harbor 9/11 Analysis

    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Six years after 9/11, America is still engaged in the War on Terrorism. Politically support for the war has eroded both inside the country and by those countries who once lent their assistance. The United States is not well thought of due to othersí views of its international…

    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    While the United States remains the world’s preeminent power, international relations are becoming increasingly multipolar. The United States must work in cooperation with its allies to achieve its international goals. However, cooperation implies willingness on the part of the other country, and if feelings of anti-american sentiment materialize, cooperation will become politically difficult for both governments. If excessive military presence is found to reduce the popular opinion of the United States abroad, then this may…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The US has been fighting this war on terrorism for a decade, and is still fighting, with little change to show for it (Tran). Peacekeeping missions led by the US increased in intensity around the world in the 1990’s, and over the last two decades the world has become a more dangerous place, which shows that the fight has been for naught (RAND). With public support for the wars divided, and the war not accomplishing anything, the wars and operations need to end (RAND). The loss of life and capital has been too extreme and the results too minimal to continue any overseas operations that the US is involved…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drone warfare, enacted by George Bush and expanded on by President Obama to provide safety for Americans against al-Qaeda. Rather than retrieving intelligence from sources within the country, the use of weaponized unmanned surveillance drones allowed for far better independent targeting decisions. These strategic implications created a question among Americans, is the use of drones to target individuals ethical? This question has arisen due to a high number of civilian casualties, making it seem unmoral. Kenneth Anderson, however, provides readers a strong argument as to why drone warfare is strategically effective with his tone, organization, use of quotes, and appeal to logic in his article, “The Case for Drones.”…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is this “willingness,” of the United States, to do what is right that has been portrayed in both the rhetoric of the Cold War as well as the rhetoric of the War on Terror. In any case, we do lead the international ‘Coalition of the Willing,’ and this coalition is portrayed as consisting of only those countries with the courage and resolve to face an evil like terrorism. Furthermore, recognizing this resemblance in the rhetoric of both wars is especially significant considering the campaigns are clearly separated by time, region, and philosophy. This might lead some to draw a greater understanding of other commonalities shared by the two…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Drone Strikes In Iraq

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Pages

    They do not throw gay men off buildings because of the invasion of Iraq. They do not crucify Christians because of Afghanistan. They do not burn apostates at the stake because of drone strikes. Nor do they stone adulterers, marry young girls and drive lorries at civilians because of our interference in the Middle East. These are merely excuses to justify their actions.…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The united states after 9/11 the attacks of world trade center has continued the use drones to kill suspected and the most wanted terrorists in different places such as Pakistan, Afghanistan, Yemen, Somalia, and other countries. Advocates say that drone strike have destroyed terrorist organizes abroad by means of exact hits with least nonmilitary personnel setbacks. Drone strikes are moderately cheap weapons, which are utilized under legitimate government oversight, and that their utilization counteracts "boots on the ground" battle and makes America more secure. The use of American drone strikes had caused three major problems such: killing a large number of civilians, create more terrorist than they kill, and the accuracy of its used. The…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United states should continue their use of drone strikes because terrorist have been attacking our nation. Not only have the terrorist have been attacking the nation,but also the people with -in the United States. We are just doing everything we can to protect our people of our nation. One reason that we are doing the drone strikes is because the United States are trying to protect the people from the terrorist so we must fight back. According to Jarret .T…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, in Pakistan, the use of drone strikes were targeted to less than 10 percent of the identified targets of the al-Qaeda, and less than 2 percent of all “militants” killed were identified leaders or the al-Qaeda or other terrorist organization. Analyzing this information shows that a majority of drone strikes are not aimed at terrorist individuals but rather an individual who fit the profile of the terrorist or terrorist organization. The continuation of attacks in Pakistan also does not justify their cause. After 9/11 the war was authorized because the government realized how big the threat of the al-Qaeda was.…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States have its own current strategies to counter state sponsored terrorism. It is based upon Former President George W. Bush Doctrine. When he addressed the National Security Strategy in October 2002 to the nation, he made it clear that, “ America will hold to account nations that are compromised by terror, including those who harbor terrorist because the allies of terror are the enemies of the civilization. In this essay we will look at current strategies being used to repel possible terrorist attack, furthermore, we will evaluate whether such current strategies should differ when developing ways to counter state sponsored terrorism.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Other perspectives, especially the political cases from the Middle Eastern nations, do not advocate for drones, as drone strikes may cause unintended collateral damage to this area of attack. For example, drones carry inherent political costs to nations, such as Yemen, Pakistan, Iran, and even Afghanistan. According to an article written by respected journalist Joshua Foust on the political consequences of drone strikes, domestic populations in the area of attack perceive drones as “almost always unpopular, as they represent a distant and unaccountable foreign power exercising the right to kill them at will” (Foust 2) . For example, the opposition to drones is debated heavily in Pakistani circles, but it's difficult to ignore the effects,…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Digital technology has opened many holes in which the government can peak into peoples’ lives. It has blurred the line between what is considered public and private information. These technologies come in many forms such as, facial recognition technology, GPS tracking devices, drones, surveillance cameras, and devices used by the NSA to collect information. These technologies are abused everyday by authorities and government officials, and it is time to set limitations on how they use them. Facial recognition technology lies in more places than people may think.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Ethical Use Of Drones

    • 1638 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In April 2015 an American hostage Warren Weinstein was killed by a US drone strike in Pakistan. Despite the fact Warren was affiliated with the terrorist group al-Qaeda, his death highlighted on going questions regarding the use of drones as weapons. Drones are unmanned flying machines usually controlled by remote pilots. During the 21st century, United States has been using these machines and utilizing them in military air strikes. Drones have propped criticism worldwide over the ethical implications of their use.…

    • 1638 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Military Drones

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Drones, An Issue Of Democracy? Military drones are an amazing piece of technology that allow the U.S. to battle combatants that it would otherwise be unable to target due to hostility of the combatants and the distance of the combat zone. The military’s advancement in drone technology has increased exponentially in the last decade, and continues to seek improvements. They’ve only recently researched into problems that can arise from implementing the technology into current U.S. military operations. Many people are worried the military may begin to use drones on U.S. soil, while others believe it undermines democracy due to the fact that a drone strike doesn’t require authorization from Congress.…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The use of drones’ also known as unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) is one of the debatable and controversial issues in America. Drones are remote-controlled aircrafts that are used in wars to carry and unleash bombs and missiles for attack (Drones, 2014). According to history, the first drone ever been used to attack is in the year 1849, is when Habsburg Austrian Empire released the drones to attack the citizens of Venice during their revolution. Ever since, the Americans have also adopted the use of drones to attack their opponents. American released their drones for an attack in Sep. 11, 2001.…

    • 1786 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays