What Is The Death Penalty: Right Or Wrong?

Improved Essays
Crime is something that is everywhere. No matter where you go there is always criminals and crime. Criminals have become part of our daily lives. Is it right? Should we see crime as just being a common misfortune in society? No, absolutely not. Obliterating crime and criminals is our daily obligation and there is no way we can afford to disregard that. Every criminal is entitled to a rightly and just punishment. A person who has multiple unpaid speeding tickets or has done simple shoplifting is not equivalent to a criminal with multiple convictions of murder and should not be recommended the death penalty. There are criminals who kill for the sake of survival, but there are ones who do it for gratification and satisfaction. I do not advise …show more content…
It creates fear and consequences to those who indulge in such acts. This punishment is would be feared by those with intellectual reason and sanity. As proposed by pass president of the United States George Walker Bush, “I support the death penalty because I believe, if administered swiftly and justly, capital punishment is a deterrent against future violence and will save other innocent lives” (Death Penalty Quotes by Presidents of the U.S.A, Internet). If would-be criminals know undoubtedly that they will be put to death should they murder with premeditation? Many of them will less likely be prone to commit murder. According to Paul Van Slambrouck, “Assaults in prisons all over US, both against fellow inmates and against staff, have more than doubled in the past decade, according to statistics gathered by the Criminal Justice Institute in Middletown, Connecticut” (Christian Science Monitor, Internet). If an inmate is already facing life without parole, do you really think it is going to matter to them if they commit future crimes while in prison? No because there is nothing stopping them from their mindset of crime. As Dr. Ernest Van Den Haag, PhD states in, For the Death Penalty, New York Time, “Common sense, lately bolstered by statistics, tells us that the death penalty will deter murder... People fear nothing more than death. Therefore, nothing will deter a criminal more than the fear of death... life in prison is less …show more content…
For example: A man murdered his former girlfriend, their two year old son and her ten year old daughter (The Columbus Dispatch, Internet). However, the man has life in which gives him his life, three meals a day and air conditioner accommodations. How is it fair in any way for a person to murder another person intentionally and still keep their life? Families living unhappy seeing the person who ruin their lives get jail time or mere rehabilitation. The majority of victim’s families find “closure” in the death penalty. Mark Klaas stated about the death penalty that “It does make a difference... It’s about the final judgment. Those individuals I’ve talked to – family members who have witnessed executions — are grateful for the experience, sad that it had to come to that, but satisfied that justice has been fulfilled” (KQED News, Internet). Many anti-death penalty supporters believe that the death penalty is inhumane. In what difference is murder not? Anti-death penalty supporters also see it as a type of revenge rather than ending the life of a person of constant threat to society. As submitted by pass president of the United States, Abraham Lincoln, he stated, “Those who deny freedom to others, deserve it not for themselves; and under a just God, can not long retain it” (Death Penalty Quotes by Presidents of the U.S.A, Internet). Although, there are not statistical facts that the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    There is no room for vengeance and a revenge stance in our justice system. The arguing stance for the death penalty says it deters murders, but in reality, the death penalty just leads to another loss of human life - regardless of the murder being an execution. When somebody tortures another human being, the government does not decide to torture that person in return. It’s the same for a rapist; the government does not rape the rapist. So, why does the government decide to murder the murderer?…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Though I concede that putting away the felons can help, I still insist that murderers get the death penalty because it is the only way to 100% guarantee that they will never kill again. The New York Times writer, Stanley Marcus, makes a great point by…

    • 1122 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Also, citizens should decide whether the death penalty is being used justly or being unfairly used against certain people. The pro side for capital punishment believes that it should be allowed. People on the pro side believe that a person should pay for what act of violence they committed by taking away his or her life since that person took another life. These people believe that the death penalty would be used as a form of deterrence meaning that the thought of dying for a crime would keep people from committing crime. A result from that, they believe, is that it would lower crime.…

    • 2346 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death Penalty Problem

    • 1615 Words
    • 6 Pages

    They believe that no one deserves to die, and that in this civilized society, they reject the principle of doing to criminals what they did do to their victims. According to them, the penalty for rape cannot be rape. Punishing with death would therefore be barbaric (ACLU, ProCon.org, n.d.). Alternatively, the best solution would be a sentence of prison without release. Even though the killing rate is reaching the thousands, there is no reason to think that the only way of punishment is sentencing the defendant to…

    • 1615 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hypocritical Death Penalty

    • 1278 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Some critics whom are against capital punishment believe that life is so precious that even the worst criminal’s life should not be taken. [6] They also believe that the offender 's life should be spared regardless of his or her crime. [6] Without capital punishment, it could be debated that the justice system provisions are not valid in response to the crime of murder, and consequently seeks no justice for the victim or the victim’s family. [4] Is this punishment valid as a deterrent to criminal’s behavior? If the criminal’s life is…

    • 1278 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Disqualifying crime and criminals is our responsibility, and we can’t reject it. Getting the properly blamed to the death penalty or sentenced is very significant. Definitely not every criminals obligate a case due to they do not have any option to survive such as who steal some foods from supermarket, however someone do this bad feelings for relaxation. I do not support the death penalty for every murder. The death penalty could continue in order to eliminate the refuse of our…

    • 1259 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Caleb Barwick 11 August 2017 Death Equals Peace Should murderers, rapists, and terrorists be let back in society after serving time in jail just to repeat the crimes they already committed? Well, with the death penalty this will not be a problem. With the death penalty that is not possible for that to happen. The death penalty is necessary for punishment because it can help cut down on terrorism, Americans prefer it as punishment, and it is needed for serious crimes. The death penalty is a capital punishment where criminals that have been convicted are put to death by the government (Issitt).…

    • 1827 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Repeal Capital Punishment

    • 2254 Words
    • 9 Pages

    N.p., 11 Nov. 2013.) This is saying it 's okay to do the same thing a murder did if I interpreted it right. This should mean that the person following up with the execution put on the Death Row but they can’t because he’s legally taking someone 's life. This plays a huge role because it just shows how bad the United States is with dealing with all of their problems.…

    • 2254 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In other words, something that is said to keep in your conscious that if you do this, this will happen to you. The death penalty or capital punishment has been said that it has deterred crime. Many individuals who are going to commit a crime can always have in their conscious that if they get caught it can mean the end of their lives so they choose not to do the crime. We put killers to death, and as a deterrent to others out there see what the price will be if they kill an innocent victim. Another reason why I believe in the death penalty is that it has many pros to it like: it serves justice if the punishment fits the crime, it holds the criminal responsible for his actions and it will stop the criminal from committing further crimes because he/she is…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Legalization of the Death Penalty The death penalty is only legal in some states, and there is much debate over whether or not sentencing criminals to death makes our communities safer. For those against the death penalty, it is understood that executing murderers does not stop other murderers, or make killings more likely. However, on the other side of the argument, those for the death penalty believe that the more severe the penalty, the more criminals will be deterred from committing the crime. In the article, ‘When Murder is Punished with Death, Fewer Criminals Will Murder,’author Jeff Jacoby argues that the death penalty is a good idea because the harsh punishment will make criminals stop and think before committing murder. Jacoby formulates…

    • 1467 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics