Political Parties Case Study

Improved Essays
common interests. This is one of the reasons why Madison wanted more territories, more states, and more districts in the United States to prevent having a majority and separate powers.
Furthermore, he did not think democracy would efficiently work in such a large country like the United States since the territory is overly large to keep all men in politics. Democracy only efficiently worked in small states because everyone was able to participate in politics such as Athena in ancient Greece. Also, he did not agree with the fact that majority would settle wise decision for the public. During that era, minority group was more educated and had more properties, so Madison had a point on his argument. Therefore, he suggested to have Republican
…show more content…
Other branches of the government are not directly chosen by the popular vote. To begin with, people do not directly vote for the President, but the voting system was created to pick electoral college representatives to vote for the presidency. In other words, people do not get to pick the President of their country by their will, but the selected representatives will do the picking for them. Although people choose the electoral college members from the political taste that they have, it would not necessarily match their wills. For example, in 2000, there was a presidential election, and the result of this election shows the difference between the popular vote and electoral college vote. For popular vote, Al Gore won against George W. Bush, but in electoral college vote, George W. Bush won. In other words, although majority people wanted Al Gore to be the President, the result did not turn as they wished due to the system. Electoral college representatives do not necessarily need to choose a person that the voters want them to choose, instead, they can choose in favor of their own as well. In the past, electoral college representatives were nominated by state representatives, and nowadays, major parties choose the members of electoral college. Those who are picked are also part of elites. Therefore, as Madison wished, the majority is not …show more content…
As we looked at the system that Madison designed, checking is the most essential concept of his theory. However, there are no mention about the balance. Throughout constant checking upon each other, there might be some balance, but it is not guaranteed. There is a possibility that one big party or one influential person could dominate the government depending on the situation; therefore, the checks are guaranteed in the Constitution, but the balances are

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    One other concern they had when establishing the executive branch was giving the president too much power. They feared the possibility of absolute power in the executive branch such as during the reign of King George the Third occurring again. That is why they put into place both limitations on the executive branch and an Electoral College system, which would make it so that a small elite group of the population would have the overall say in who becomes elected the next president. Therefore, if the Electoral College would be eliminated, the founders would probably not react too well. All the effort that they went to in order to make sure that the president would not be elected based off of just popular votes would have gone to waste.…

    • 1995 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This system favors some citizens over others, which denies some people their choice of president. There is no proper distribution of the vote. Lots of presidents, like President Bush, lost the majority vote but won the electoral vote. As Edwards states, “…’proper distribution’…This claim is nonsense.” Direct voting would increase turnout. Because the citizens would know their vote would actually count for…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, the Founding Fathers made wanting any future changes into the constitution very difficult. Large states usually divide their power evenly between the two parties. Without the existence of the Winner Take All System, the power would all go to the small states and the different ethnicity groups and young parties would lose their importance. The Electoral College helps give equal power and representation for all states. If we had a direct popular election, then the most populated regions of the country would control the election.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thus, under the Electoral College, the people of the U.S. do not directly vote for their president. The Electoral college is counterproductive to democracy as it has, on multiple, occasions, produced a result that does not reflect the will of the people. To begin with, Article II of the U.S. Constitution outlines the Executive Branch which includes the president, vice president, and the Electoral College. As previously stated, the number of electors for each…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The popular vote isn’t always the one that decides the election. In the history of the United States four candidates have become president even though they didn’t win the popular vote. George Bush won the 2000 election even though he lost the popular vote to Al Gore who had 48% of the popular votes while Bush only had 47%. However, he received 5 more electoral votes which is how he became president (Kimberling). Since results are based on the number of electoral votes and not the number of popular votes, presidential candidates can still win the election even if the nation voted for the other candidate.…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The original idea was that Congress would chose the president. However, Americans were wary of national/federal government because of the unfair way they were treated by the English government. Because of this fear, the people wanted to have a say in the election. Congress was therefore not given the power to elect the president because of that fear of an overly strong government, and also due to the idea that that the president should not be voted in by Congress because then the president might feel more obligated to Congress than to the people5. Some delegates believed that the president should be elected by popular vote of the people, however the consensus was that this would be a bad idea.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    My second reason is that it doesn’t match up with the popular votes that were taken by the people. This two reasons alone are more than enough to show this system needs to be fixed. My first reason is that representation is NOT equal; our founding fathers wanted everyone to be considered equal. Furthermore, its unequal in a way that most people would not expect, the smaller states have a larger say in who gets to be our president. One example of this would be the election data from 2010 comparing the states of Montana VS Illinois.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An opposing view by some voters is with the college, small states and swing states will have more power. For example, one man will not equal one vote. Since California has 55 Electoral College votes that equals 705,454 people per vote while there are only 194,717 people for each of Wyoming’s three electoral votes (News Max Brenda Noble July 2, 2015). Small states would not have a voice without the Electoral college and it would mean their vote would not matter. Additionally, Americans in the divided states should be able to hear from those campaigning to be President which enables voters to select the candidate of their choice before heading to the…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Fair Vote’s “Problems with the Electoral College” article, it states that “small states were given additional power to prevent politicians from only focusing on issues which affect the larger states. The fear was…politicians would completely ignore small states and only focus on big population centers.” This may seem as a solution to allow small states to have a voice, but inversely it quiets the larger states, which much of the political issues deal…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Electoral College System

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The President does not, however, have control over when vacancies will happen in the Justices. He also has to pass these appointed Justices to the Senate who have to confirm the appointees. The President’s vote is the only one that controls the selection of a Justice. The Senate can only accept or reject the President’s proposal, they cannot choose for the President. Unless he delegates that power to them.…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays