Democracy In The Middle East

Improved Essays
Before entering the course, I believed that democracy in the Middle East was a viable option but that, because of many cultural reasons, was not the best option for that region. Now, having taken this course and learned about the different aspects of Middle East governance, I do not think that democracy is a viable option at all. It is not the matter of democracy cannot succeed in the Middle East or anything like that, it is the matter of democracy not being properly suited for societies like those in the Middle East. The agenda of the United States to turn a lot of these nations into democracies has really gotten nowhere. I would say that they actually caused more problems in this region than actually solved during their quest for democratization. …show more content…
Democracy, as most nations in the world have it today, is not properly suited for the Middle East. Their deep roots in Islam and the western world influence on them makes it hard for democracy to become stable. I believe this region needs to be left alone by the western world when it comes to politics. The past century has seen constant intervention by the western world in their quest to ‘fix the problems’ and to ‘make the middle east a stable nation’. The Arab World has the chance to become a big powerhouse and to thrive like we saw before the Crusades. Back then; they were not being influenced by any outside nation. They developed beautiful cities, influenced many of the smartest people in history, and become very wealthy in the process. This could easily be achieved again if they stop being influenced by the powerhouses in the western world and start fixing their own problems. How is a region supposed to succeed if they cannot even stand on their own two feet without help from the western world? The solution to their problems is something that many nations have done; develop their own type of governance. The United States became what they are today from taking the democracy that France had, and developing it into their own. The Middle East must now do the same. They need to take bits and parts from different forms of governance and make their own system. A system that will give rights to their people, prevent widespread corruption in their government, fix the problems they have now, and allow Islam to be rooted in their nation. The Middle East is such a special case, when it comes to governance, that I cannot see them adopting a current ideology and having it work to their advantage. The Middle East has all the necessary resources and characteristics to become a prosperous nation again, they just need to find themselves to get

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    There is not sufficient democracy in Iraq, the middle east really isn 't anymore evolved now than it was when we first sent troops in, and our relationship with Iraq is still in shambles. In conclusion, going to war with Iraq was done with the intentions to help make this increasingly oppressive state, free from the chains and whips that it is founded from. We as Americans wanted to help spread democracy, so that the Iraq could finally have civil liberties, and even a thriving economy. That goal sadly was not accomplished, because of the lack of cultural understanding, violence, and the sheer number of people that we were up against. However, there is still hope that one day Iraq and the middle east will become an area of democracy.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As Winston Churchill once said, “Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the others.” The world seems to have embraced this idea, making democracy, at least for now, the most ideal form of government possible. Some regions of the world embrace this more than others. For example, there are no democracies in the Arab world. There are many different reasons as to why this may be, religion, culture, etc. However I believe that the main reasons that the Arab world are not democratic is because of their lack of belief in secularism, the economic structures, and western worlds war on terror and its influence on the population 's perception of democracy.…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States policy framework will require additional high-level attention and wider support within the administration if it is not to be a futile fix. A serious program of long-term support for Middle East democracy will need to follow these guidelines: 1. The United States must not attempt to marginalize Islamist groups. Instead, the United States must differentiate between the truly extremist organizations that must be isolated because they are committed to violence and those amenable to working legally to achieve their goals. 2.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The citizens of Iran, Iraq, and Israel are victims of their government’s inability to establish peace and stability in the region. The United States’ answer to why peace is not a viable outcome in the Middle East is the lack of democracy in the countries that have the most influence. On the surface that may seem like a legitimate reason but the United States’ understanding of the cultural differences in the Middle East is apparent with the debacle in Iraq. Democracy is not the solution in the Middle East; the concept would just not work under the current self-aggrandizing leadership. The invasion of Iraq has only strengthened the ethnic divide and fostered the notion that the country can only survive if it splits into three ethnic regions.…

    • 4876 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Balance of power has put states on check with each other, but there is nothing to put a world government on check because it would be the top authority. Because it is much a difficult issue to tackle, I feel like world governance is the best solution for now, until a situation is big enough push the need for a world government and force the creation of it. But then, there comes the issue of acting too late. Considering the risk of acting too late, I think I am for a world government simply because the world might not be able to afford acting too late. Yes, some nations will not benefit as much as other, but the world will benefit if issues like climate change gets…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    After the United States became an independent nation, they sought to form a government that was different than the monarchal system they had separated from in Europe. In this regard, Americans were hesitant to adopt a strong federal government, yet a system of primarily state power did not seem functional. The first system of government, outlined in the Articles of Confederation, was a failure at balancing this argument. The Articles gave the states almost complete power and divulged virtually none to the federal government. This showed the severe unbalance between state and federal power and resulted in a faulty system of government that ultimately failed.…

    • 1598 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This form of government is not legitimate because it is inefficient and doesn't allow for representation from minority groups. The city state of Athens had a small population with almost no diversity, so this form of government could have potentially been sustainable at least in the short term. Since city states do not really exist anymore, this form of government would not be sustainable. If the system is to have a majority rule, the majority groups will be the only ones represented because every vote would be in their best interests. Minority groups would eventually have no political power or influence and they would eventually leave the community or be forced out by the majority groups.…

    • 1826 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One thing to consider is the destruction that happened in Iraq due to the invasion, which is indeed not what the Iraqi people have ever wanted regardless of the outcomes. Although all Americans believe that democracy is the best method of government, other people may disagree. What is true to some people may not be true to another, which Americans forgot to consider due to their belief in American Exceptionalism. Two hundred and forty years ago, Americans knew well what it feels like to be under the invasion of a tyrant, yet they still chose to become that tyrant in the eyes of another country. Military force is indeed not the finest way to prove exceptionalism, nor is it the way to teach other people about their own right to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” (par 2).…

    • 1564 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Examples Of Free Republics

    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It would not be possible to find representatives who are familiar with all parts of the continent. Our state governments should guard our interests and rights. They would understand the people so they could more closely relate with them. The experience of local government in the New World is very appealing. The result of such a government would be a completely changed society where people are honest and virtuous.…

    • 1365 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Things get even more complicated for the Ottomans and Arabs when religion gets involved. For the The Ottoman Empire, World War I was considered a holy war, contrast that to the Arabs, not only are the people living in a region with little power in their government but, they are also a multiethnic people with little consensus as a governance and multiple religions . Islam is a popular religion in the region but there is also Christianity and Judaism, as well as a few indigenous religions that thrive there . The Arabs were not only wanting freedom to govern their own lives but also the wish to practice their beliefs freely from the…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays