Arguing the differences between men and women is a never-ending battle of the sexes and he said she said. There is no denying that inequality is present in society today but what isn’t clear is why. Some groups argue society itself is to blame but others side with biology and evolutionary science. Both sides use deconstruction to justify their beliefs and solutions for equality between the sexes however using deconstruction for political or social reform does not equate the most successful arguments.
Deconstruction is a method of analysis used to recognize the inner workings of conceptual systems by picking them apart until an inevitable center is found. The irony is that deconstruction as a process cannot be stopped, limited, and provides no end in sight. Deconstruction is most popularly …show more content…
The answer wielded from deconstructing a social ideal is in itself a social ideal to be deconstructed by someone else. One cannot use ideas discovered from deconstruction as grounds for political or social reform because as Stanley Fish claims deconstruction “neither mandates nor authorizes any course of action” (Fish). Using deconstruction in this way results in social dissonance as Pinker notes with a group be calls “gender feminists” (2002).
Gender feminists, as Pinker describes them, believe inequality between men and women is a result of the “pervasive system of male dominance” present in our society (Pinker 2002). Their theory of human nature relies on the blank slate that people must be socialized to want things, in the
Deconstruction is a method of analysis used to recognize the inner workings of conceptual systems by picking them apart until an inevitable center is found. The irony is that deconstruction as a process cannot be stopped, limited, and provides no end in sight. Deconstruction is most popularly …show more content…
The answer wielded from deconstructing a social ideal is in itself a social ideal to be deconstructed by someone else. One cannot use ideas discovered from deconstruction as grounds for political or social reform because as Stanley Fish claims deconstruction “neither mandates nor authorizes any course of action” (Fish). Using deconstruction in this way results in social dissonance as Pinker notes with a group be calls “gender feminists” (2002).
Gender feminists, as Pinker describes them, believe inequality between men and women is a result of the “pervasive system of male dominance” present in our society (Pinker 2002). Their theory of human nature relies on the blank slate that people must be socialized to want things, in the