Neutral Questions In Research

Improved Essays
What is a question and what is being neutral? A question by definition is a sentence worded or expressed so as to elicit information. This shows that a question is asked in order to get information but you want to get information because you are curious. Curiosity by definition means a strong desire to know or learn something. This proves that you have curiosity when you have a strong desire, desire means a strong feeling of wanting to have something or wishing for something to happen. this shows that behind every question there is a desire to wish for something so bias is always present. A neutral question is in my perspective is like a closed question. Closed questions points the individual who are being questioned in one direction, whether …show more content…
Natural sciences are on of the areas of knowledge where questions should be objective. That should be the aim of the natural sciences and it is to a certain extent but then we also have human error occurring. The human error being the scientists and how they run labs and record data. The question is not neutral because scientists have that desire to want something that will describe the natural world. Scientist first come up with a hypothesis, which is supposed to be objective but since labs are carried out to find a particular thing, the hypothesis can not be objective. Scientist use intuition from observations or other events to develop a hypothesis and in doing so they are carrying bias in their hypothesis. An example of subjectivity in the natural sciences are when scientists want to find what the gravity of earth is. It 's not neutral because they themselves are saying that there is gravity present in earth this become a bias based question. Another bias that presented in science is with labs, when scientists do a lab and they come up with an hypothesis and all the question revolve around the hypothesis that was given. When Newton first discovered gravity, he had thought about the apples …show more content…
Questions to a certain extent do have bias presented in them based on the way they are asked or who the are asked by. When asking a question, you are trying to find the answer to something you are uncertain about. Natural sciences shows that questions can be both subjective and objective making questions having a 50/50 bias level. But bias will always be present in an question since it is created by humans. We know this because of human sciences, looking back at the Key Club example, the way I asked my question, I was leading the candidate to one direction, this shows that I was being bias and was wanting we are able to clearly see that humans are subjective. So we can conclude that there is no such thing as a neutral question because a neutral question would be pure objective and since no question can be pure objective unless its not created by man there is no such thing as a neutral question. Some argue technology is objective because technology is designed to be neutral so no bias being presented. But there is a key word there designed. Which doesn 't state that it is, its just supposed to be. Since technology is a man made product then there has to be bias because human sciences show that humans cannot be objective. So human bias will be implemented in that technology which results with technology still have bias with it. So a question can be biased to some extent because natural sciences show that objectivity is present in

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Science is capable of explaining and verifying many things, but it cannot explain or verify everything. The word “science” comes from the Latin word “scientia” which means “knowledge”. Science is the knowledge and study of facts in the natural world and the process of experimenting and observing the facts in order to draw generalized conclusions. Science is made up of the knowledge revealed to and discovered by mankind. This is why science cannot prove everything, because we do not know everything; scientist do not have all the answers they are simply guessing.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Science involves systematic inquiry into the natural world which aims to organize, predict and explain empirical data. One strength is that this definition not only defines science, but mentions what science aims for. A weakness this definition has is it is too broad with the term "the natural word". Scientism says that unless one can test it scientifically then its not worth anything. Many people affirm this way of thinking because maybe like skeptics they seek certainty in their beliefs and they feel security in this way of thought.…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    2. How does Kuhn 's view differ from Popper 's view of science? Kuhn 's view differs from Popper 's view of science in the way of scientific method. Popper sets a very high standard for scientific method by the principle of demarcation and criticism. According to Popper, any theory can be proven false through empirical evidence or experimental data but cannot be proven true.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Heather E. Douglas’s essay “The Dark Side of Science”, she mentioned that scientists should be responsible for their discoveries that are used to the awful advantages that they could be used for. Scientist who makes these discoveries may know what they can endure. Scientist usually knows how there discovers will end up, but mostly they do not think of the reproductions that could happen if they ended up being used for the wrong intended purposes for that particular discovery. Douglas writes how it should be one sided and scientist should be held accountable for their actions, maybe they need to look at the bigger picture before they decide to point fingers at who should be responsible for what. Douglas had some good points, but…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    At a public lecture at Princeton University Dr. Behe answered the question to why scientists are reluctant to embrace the theory of intelligent design, with people considering something of natural design implicates something beyond nature and is not real science. Darwin’s Black Box is very important for its contribution to the debate between intelligent design and…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The scientists and their methods offer the ways for us to comprehend the situation and to search up the facts that are buried within. In David Hume’s Treatise, the use of anaphora and alliteration imply to the idea that a fact is a contradiction and you can’t reason with a contradiction. Since it’s a fact, it cannot be questioned. Both Hume and Locke believe that people came up with false facts due to the cause and effect method. Since people experience different kinds of situations, the outcome of the cause will create an effect, which they label as a fact.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main argument that the author was trying to bring out is that the opposition (not the distinction) between quantitative and qualitative research is false, the dualism between the two researches is mistaken. The ‘naive realism’ attributed to those who support more quantitative methodology is not prove to be right. Qualitative research helps test and build block of quantitative knowing. Since ‘facts’ are created by the society and different societies have different cultures; therefore, the meaning changes from time to time and affects how people understand…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lama characterizes knowledge and responsibility by having more knowledge you have more responsibility meaning you have to be educated to be able to question genetics correctly. Leaving the technology to businessman and scientist is not helping us and is actually hurting us because we are leaving the moral line for them to find out. If this technology is going to change humanity then humanity should have a…

    • 1267 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Secondly, Karl Popper thinks that if science had followed an induction path, it would not have made such progress. An example case would be described when a scientist arrives at a generalization. If she/ he follows the induction method, he or she will go in search of instances which establish it as truth. If he/ she finds an instance which conflicts with her/ his generalization and establishment, then the scientist is required to qualify the generalization mentioning that the generalization is really true except, in the cases where it has been held to be false or rather unsupported. The type of such qualifications imposes heavy limitations and curtailment restrictions on the scope of the generalization.…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Different interpretations’ of facts, theories, and beliefs between people automatically generates controversy. People believe their facts are correct so they attempt to “correct” others’ facts and beliefs. The conflict between nature and language was one of many issues that created a huge controversy between science and humanistic beliefs. What actually caused the issues between these beliefs is the misinterpretation of facts of the natural world and humanities utilization of language. Humanity is favorably blind to Darwin’s observation of the natural world causing a misinterpretation of language use resulting in controversy.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays