The Importance Of Crime In The United States

Decent Essays
Seizures that are done unconstitutionally don’t normally occur, but I did recently read an article relating to your answer. Sadly, sometimes police may seize someone’s private property, even if they did not commit any crimes. According to the webpage ACLU (2013), 130 CAID patrons were innocent, but were detained by the police at an Art Institute in Detroit which resulted in confiscation and the impoundment more than thirty cars and citations. However, there were no drugs or any weapons found. The American Civil Liberties Union decided to file a lawsuit because their cars were confiscated and they the police raided the institute when no crime was present. According the U.S. District Judge Victoria A. Roberts, the police was unconstitutional because it violated the 4th amendment. Arresting people with no evidence to prove that they have broken law is no doubt unconstitutional. The police argued that some people present could have been arrested, but lacked the probable cause to detain everybody at the institute. During the raid, some men and women established enough probable cause, but not enough probable cause to arrest everybody at the institute. Dan Korobkin, who is an ACLU staff …show more content…
My mother lives in Boston and is only an hour away from the marathon that took place that day. My mother called me all upset that day saying that the police went through every body’s house in the neighborhood, even if they denied. What do you think about searches like that? Do you think it s right for the police to search everybody’s house without their consent, when a terror attack occurs? I also heard that they ran into homes that nobody was present at the time and left the doors wide open. The police are trying to protect and serve their community. I don’t really see anything wrong with it and I would have welcomed the police in if they asked, but I am not sure if that is still he right thing to

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Holding: No. The actions of Officer Turek did not violate the defendants Fourth Amendment rights to be free from unreasonable seizure. The reason for this is because the Fourth Amendment does not prohibit a warrantless arrest for a minor criminal offense. A seatbelt violation is considered a minor criminal offense by law and is punishable only by a fine, therefore the seizure was…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    574, 13 A.L.R. 1159], holding that Fourth Amendment proscriptions against unreasonable searches and seizures do not apply to private conduct, is still good law and controlling” (Stanford Law School,…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However if the officer had pulled these individuals over soley based on the color of their skin, he would not be able to search and seize the individuals. The fourth amendment forbids an officer to search and seize soley on the basis of race, and if the officer had racially profiled the individuals then they could have filed a motion to suppress. However, the officer acted within the scope of the seizure by having legitimate interest and suspicions. The Fourth Amendment clearly states that an officer may search the person arrested, those in plain view of the officer and the accused, and things or places that the acussed person can touch, or that is otherwise in their immediate personal control without a warrant as long as there is legitimate reasoning and it is not an unreasonable search.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Chimel Vs Chimel

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages

    6. separate opinions- the supreme court judge said every state law enforcement runs into troubles and now with having things straight forward the 4th amendment of the united states constitution protects people from unreasonable search and seizures. You can go in with an arrest warrant to search the attic. When you have an arrest warrant your arresting the person and securing anything around him that can be evidence from being tempered and use of force toward law enforcement. 7.analysis-…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The trial court, in this case the Superior Court, dismissed, or dropped, the charges against Mr. Greenwood stating that the warrantless searches of Mr. Greenwood's trash violated the protection from unreasonable search and seizure in the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution. The government then appealed to the Court of Appeals and the California Supreme Court, both courts denied the government's claims and the case was finally appealed the United States Supreme Court.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Search Warrants It is Saturday and like every other Saturday night you are stuck in the house since your friends failed to invite you to do any activities. You decided to be a little spontaneous and text a couple of your friends along with your local drug dealer. After begging your parents to let you borrow the car you then pick up the weed, and then a couple of you and closest friends all decide to go out to a party. Before you all walk into the house you put the car in park and decide to roll up the weed with intentions of smoking it before you all walk into the party.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stop And Frisk Case Study

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Police should be allowed to stop and frisk subjects who seem suspect. In the case Terry v. Ohio (1968) the Supreme Court’s ruling allowed the procedures of “Stop and Frisk” to be acceptable. For a stop and first to be considered legal, the police officer must have reasonable suspicion that a crime has already occurred or is about to take place. Only then can a police officer start a line of questioning toward the suspect. However, the “frisk” portion of stop and frisk must only be done if the police officer suspects the individual is carrying any dangerous weapon.…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The definition or exclusionary rule “is a law that protects the use of illegally obtained evidence in a criminal trial.” The exclusionary rule falls under the fourth amendment which protects every individual from unlawful searches and seizure. This rule is based on the constitutional law, it was made, so that evidence that was collected “illegally” cannot be used to prosecute a suspect. To begin with, if a police officers want to obtain a warrant, they must have reasonable causes to do a search legally.…

    • 215 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is a person's private property really private? Unreasonable search and seizures where he or she feels violated by a sheriff or police officer because they did not have a warrant on them to search the person or their property. The right that is being discussed is protection against illegal search of self, home, or property. A person has the right and should always say no if a sheriff or police officer do not have a warrant with them. Most people say this, “fruit of the poisonous tree”(Understanding Search-and-Seizure Law).…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fourth Amendment states "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. " It prohibits…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides, "[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized”( Interests Protected law.cornell.edu). Probable cause is if there something that's easily to tell that something's wrong or not right. Like if it's a murder scene or they can smell drugs or smell alcohol in the car. But very many cases are being dismissed because of the failure of the use of a search warrant. Even though that really isn’t a good thing it assures you because of the fourth amendment you can't go to prison because it’s a cop's word against a civilians.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An attorney with the ACLU said, “she did nothing that was suspicious.” Bill Goodman was the attorney representing Hebshi. During her detainment, she was frightened and humiliated. Court ruling says they can search and seize because of reasonable suspicion.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fourth Amendment In Texas

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As well the court also stated that detaining a person to require him to identify himself with lack of evidence against him/her violates their Fourth Amendment right. The Fourth Amendment requires such action,or that the seizure should be carried out pursuant to plan embodying explicit,neutral limitations of individual officers. In other words, a police officer can’t arrest you,detain you,or search you without a search warrant or an arrest warnat. Though there are some expectations on getting search or being detained,like for instances if a police officer asks your permission to search in your belongings and you agree then that’s not considered an intrusion of your privacy because you allowed him/her to search in your belongings. Same goes for being arrested because in order to be charged with a crime police officers must have reasonable suspicion and enough evidence to charge you with that crime.…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Operation Pipeline

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The legal infrastructure of the War on Drugs has easily turned every moment of one’s life a moment of possibility for arrest. The leniency on policemen and their reasons for suspecting someone of a crime is partially was is causing this outbreak of incarcerations. Although there are times when the police are correct in their assumptions, their reasons for making these assumptions are out of line. Methods of fighting drug crime, such as Operation Pipeline, may be effective, but not a hundred percent necessary. Michelle Alexander mentioned that “once upon a time,” it was common knowledge that unless a policeman had probable cause, they had no reason or right to stop and search someone (Alexander 63).…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Stop And Frisk

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Crime in the United States has been very bad in the last couple decades, though in the more recent years’ crime has been steadily decreasing. The police have been implementing a way of reducing crime by using the method of stop and frisk mostly in cities such as New York City or Chicago which are more prominently used. Stop and frisk is when a police officer has reasonable suspicion that a crime is going to happen, about to happen, or has happened before stopping a suspect. The officer then goes on to do a quick pat down to see if they have anything suspicious on them. There are different points of view of whether or not the act of stop and frisk should be legal or not.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays