The Importance Of The Potsdam Conference

Superior Essays
Within Truman’s first few weeks of presidency, Truman attended the Potsdam Conference in 1945. The Potsdam conference was a conference where Stalin, Churchill, and Truman nicknamed the Big Three, met in Potsdam, Germany to negotiate the end of World War II (The Potsdam Conference). The Potsdam Conference was a significant event mainly because it gave the all of the leaders a chance to discuss their plans so that there was no confusion amongst the allies regarding post-war plans in Germany and the defeat of Japan (The Potsdam Conference). Truman was also able to develop relationships with other world leaders. This conference was especially important due to the fact that the European war had just ended, therefore there were a lot of concerns …show more content…
Ferrell, Truman had two main reasons for dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. First of all, there was an emotional reason that had to do with Japan’s surprise bombing of Pearl Harbor (Ferrell 209). After the bombings in Japan Truman responded to a letter asking why he had done it with stating, “You should do your weeping at Pearl Harbor, where thousands of American boys are underneath waves caused by a Japanese sneak attack while we were at peace with Japan” (211). He mentioned how people, “tend to forget” that at the time of Pearl Harbor, the United States were trying to remain in peace with Japan by organizing a treaty (211). He continues the letter by stating that as a result of the bombing of Pearl Harbor, “Altogether, there were between 3,000 and 6,000 youngsters killed at the time without any declaration of war. It was plain murder” (211). Through this comment, it appears as if Truman is trying to make his decision of dropping the bombs over Hiroshima and Nagasaki not as great a blow because Japan murdered all of these American youngsters while they were trying to negotiate peace. He ended the letter stating that, “He knew what he was doing” (211) and that he didn’t regret anything and that if he had to decide again, he would still drop the bombs over Hiroshima and Nagasaki (211). Ferrell suggests that this reason is more of an emotional reason, due to the fact that Truman’s response to Pearl Harbor suggests that he seeks revenge, and the bombings over Japan provide

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Truman Hasty Decision Dbq

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    From order of President Truman, the United States dropped two atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, thus ending World War Two. President Truman’s hasty decision is not one to be honorable. This choice by the president was made with ignorance, lack of empathy, and lack of critical thinking. The bombing is unjustified due to Japan’s inevitable surrender, the amount of civilian casualties, and alternative opportunities to the bombing.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pearl Harbor Dbq Essay

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages

    President Truman was weary about using the atomic bomb and asked for advice from his top military advisors and even Winston Churchill if it should be used; to which they all agreed that it should (Doc 8). On August 6, 1945, the U.S had dropped the first atomic bomb nicknamed “Little Boy” on Hiroshima and three days later the atomic bomb “Fat Man” was dropped on Nagasaki; destroying the land and the people that inhabited it. Truman knew that using the bomb would forever change the war game and that dropping the bomb as well as creating it, lead to potentially more deadly and harmful…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    He had to choose whether or not to use the atomic bomb on Japan. He was hoping the bomb would end World War II with Japan. There are a number of reasons why Truman chose to drop the atomic bomb. The United States targeted three cities, but Hiroshima…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Potsdam declaration occurred during the final stages of the Pacific War. In its content, the United States, Great Britain and China outlined the specific terms calling for the unconditional surrender of Japan. The terms also included the agreement of Japan to allow foreign troops to occupy their country, renounce its claims to territories on the Asian mainland (including Taiwan), its leaders and soldiers would be tried for war crimes, its citizens were to choose their own form of government, and lastly, if Japan refused, then the entire country would risk facing “prompt and utter…

    • 96 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If the United States decided against using the atomic bomb, U.S. soldiers would have invaded Japanese islands. This operation was named Operation Downfall, and this invasion would have led to thousands of casualties. Japan was willing the literally fight to the death and President Truman knew that if we didn’t use the atomic bomb that the United States would continue to fight as long as Japan was still standing. An ironic justification for dropping the bomb is not only did it save American lives, but it also saved Japanese lives. It was predicted that if Operation Downfall took place that anywhere from 5 to 10 million Japanese casualties would have occurred.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Truman’s choice to drop the bomb on Japan was justified since it helped in ending the war rapidly. Truman made the right call, to drop the atomic bomb, in order to end the war, gain back the economy, to show who is the strongest nation, and to have less blood being spilled. Likewise, it is developed that dropping the atomic bomb has offered Japan to stop engaging the war. Japan surrenders and agrees that they won 't have the ability to fight another war after the end of World War II. Some Japanese pioneers agreed that the assaulting fundamentally pounded Japan 's vitality to continue with the war.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Potsdam Summary

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Potsdam: The End of World War II and the Remaking of Europe is a well-written nonfiction by author and historian Michael Neiberg. He is currently a professor of history in the department of National Security at the U.S. Army War College. He is a very intelligent man, who has published many books all related to theme of war. Neiberg also has a background at the U.S. Air Force Academy and the University of Southern Mississippi. As I stated before all his books are related to the theme of war, mainly between the two World Wars.…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The dropping of atomic bombs is Hiroshima and Nagasaki was one of the most catastrophic bombing is history. It resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths and the destruction of more than half of the cities infrastructures. Nonetheless Harry S. Truman and his advisors saw it as the only way to lead Japan to an unconditional surrender. While this is simply the opinion of the United States Commander in Chief and his advisors, there is a lot of controversy as to if it was truly a necessity in forcing Japan to surrender and ending the war. In the “Yes” article, “The Biggest Decision: Why We Had To Drop The Atomic Bomb” by Robert James Maddox argues why dropping atomic bombs in Japan became a necessity when land invasions and the Russians’ mediation were not effective.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages

    " On the other hand, the United States’ decision to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima was a military measure to ensure that Japan would fully surrender. In Document H titled, Radio Address, Harry S Truman, President Truman stated, “We have used it in order to shorten the agony of war, in order to save the lives of thousands and thousands of young Americans.” He stated that the U.S had used the atomic bombs to end the war quickly and to save more American lives. However, as said by General HH Arnold, the Japanese were already on the verge of collapse.” This meant that even if the bombs weren’t used, then Japan still would have…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This bomb killed roughly 75,000 Japanese. On the morning of August 10, Japan finally accepted the Potsdam Treaty, then Japan began paying the price for the war. Meanwhile in America, Truman was praised as a hero and was elected for a second term. Truman certainly made many difficult decisions over the span of a short time, but his intentions never changed. Protect American lives and end the…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Not only are there many misconceptions on the act of the bombing itself, but about Truman and how he was as a person. To begin, Truman had won the love and affection of many Americans after his career (7). People thought of him as “honest, confident, and decisive”. Although this may not be completely inaccurate, Walker uses Historian Alonzo L. Hamby as a source and explains that Truman was also “petty, vindictive, thin-skinned, and suspicious” (7). This shows how the average American couldn’t truly believe everything when discussing about Truman and his decision to attack Japan.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Truman saw that by ending this war, it would not only save American lives, but also Europeans, Indians, Koreans, Vietnamese, and Chinese lives. In fact, according to Newman’s essay Dropping the Bomb was Necessary and Justifiable “ Harry Truman ordered the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki primarily to end the war as soon as possible and save lives”(Newman,414). However, I believe it is important to understand that it was not just Truman’s decision to drop the bomb. In fact the Interim Committee was put together for the purpose of supporting Truman with making decisions regarding the atomic bomb. In a primary document of recommendation the Interim Committee suggests the combat use of the bomb against Japan.…

    • 1359 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Decision to Drop the Bomb During the summer of 1945, things were looking pretty grim for Imperial Japan, as they were the last axis power left and had been under constant firebombing for the United States, President Truman chose to drop two atomic bombs, one on Hiroshima on August 6th and one on Nagasaki on August 9th. Since before either of the two bombs had been dropped, it has been debated whether or not it was the right decision. Truman stated that the bombs were dropped to save American lives, but many argue over the government’s other motives at the time. Many bring up valid points over why the bomb should not have been dropped and that the government public justification for dropping the bomb was based off of false information, but ultimately the motivation behind dropping the bomb, hidden by the government or not, outweighs the reasons for not dropping the bomb.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Soldiers were prepared to go into the mission, but if they had millions would be dead. Dropping the atomic bombs was a good decision to save millions of Japanese and American troops. The reason for dropping the bombs can because of the many American lives that were lost during the attack on Pearl Harbor. As a nation, America felt the right way to get back at Japan was to bomb them back but on a more massive scale. In his infamy speech, FDR says, “I regret to tell you that very many American lives have been lost.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki: Abhorrent but Necessary On August 6, 1945, the city of Hiroshima, Japan went up in smoke when “Little Boy,” an atomic bomb developed in the secretive Manhattan Project, was dropped. Three days later, the atomic bomb dubbed “Fat Man” obliterated another Japanese city, Nagasaki. The bombing itself and its effect on survivors’ health was devastating, and President Truman’s decision to drop the bombs remains highly controversial 71 years later. In fact, Naji Dahi, Ph.D., insists that the bombings were unnecessary, unjustified, and ineffective.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays