Lawful Inventory Search: Necessary Or Harmful?

Improved Essays
Conducting an inventory search can be a sensitive topic to discuss because it has a relativity close connection to the fourth amendment, which is the right to privacy. Law enforcement have the right to warrantless searches when a subject is under policy custody. However, there are certain procedures and guidelines that has to be taking in order to ensure a lawfully inventory search. There are court cases that have been presented that makes that exemption to the fourth amendment more complex. This is why it is vital for the law enforcement to be cautious, and avoid impermissible inventory searches as much as possible. With the guidelines of an inventory search being revised frequently citizens and law enforcers have to be aware to when and under what conditions are inventory searches permissible and impermissible.

Are Inventory Searches Being Conducted Lawfully?
…show more content…
It is also impermissible if there is no policy governing the subject in regards to an inventory search. For example, the law enforcement have no right to stop someone for a traffic violation and insist an inventory search to be done in search for criminal contents. However, if an officer have reasonable suspicious of a crime being committed during a stop and that person gets detained, that officer has the right to do an inventory search in good faith after it is impounded because the subject is now under policy custody. Also, if any incriminating evidence is found when conducting an inventory search than it can be lawfully seized under the plain view doctrine. A court case where the department of justice unlawfully did an inventory search was Florida vs Well (1990); in this case it discuss how an inventory search of a closed container is unjust because there was not a policy that governed the opening of that container. Without following the proper guideless an inventory search can quickly be turned into an unlawfully

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Dmak Dbq Analysis

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A thermal scanner was used on the house of DLK without a warrant, in order to obtain evidence that DLK was illegally growing marijuana. DLK sued on the grounds that the scan was a search, and since there was no warrant, it violated his fourth amendment right. The government went too far by scanning DLK’s house because the scan indicated things about the house that would be unknown unless one entered the house, revealed things which DLK wished to keep private and took reasonable measures to protect, and was a violation of privacy. Thermal scanners indicate things about the house that would not be unknown unless one entered the house. They can show vents, rooms, and insulation abnormalities through heat build up.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Indeed, the Terry search principle was regarded, and the limit to which it was supposed to be conducted was reviewed, Terry vs. Ohio case. The court further went into other cases that had resolved issues on the fourth amendment and the Terry search (Minnesota v Dickerson, 1993). Indeed, in Michigan vs. Long, the Court held that in the context of that case, a Terry search allowed the search of the individual and passenger’s compartments of the automobile to ascertain beyond doubt that the defendant was not armed and dangerous. In limited cases, the Court held that when contraband is retrieved, then the officer cannot ignore the contraband as the Fourth Amendment does not suppress it under those circumstances. However, the court in Long had ruled that if police lacked probable cause in believing that the object in plain view was contraband then conducting a further search to make the object apparent would make the plain view doctrine unwarranted with the seizure of the contraband.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Therefore there was not any probable cause or reasonable suspicion for the search of the cell phone. The contents of the bag, including a vaseline jar and a sandwich wrapper, do not give reasonable grounds for the search of the phone. If Sanders and Turpin found no marijuana on L.O.L. and sent him back to class, what was the purpose of keeping his cell phone as there was no reasonable suspicion and probable cause. Similarly in the case G.C. v. Owensboro Public Schools (2013), the Sixth circuit had ruled against the school’s search of the student’s cell phone.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Achman Case Study

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I, Supreme Court Justice, Floyd McLeod, find in favor of Mohammed Achman. This case has proved to me that Mr. Achman 's rights as an U.S. citizen were violated multiple times. To go more in depth; on September 27, 2001, approximately two weeks after the terrorist attack of the World Trade Center, America, especially New York ,were on edge in finding any little details to get to the bottom of the attack and any future attacks. Unfortunately, the Achman 's felt the wrath and discrimination from American civilians. It all started with people breaking one of his windows to his store and destroying his mosque in queens.…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Fourth Amendment Warrants

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Pages

    As followed, searches incident to arrest do not require a warrant if the search is in radius of the suspect. The officer may search the surrounding area for illegal contraband or weapons. Ultimately, to protect the officers around as well as to collect valuable…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This paper argues that the Fourth Amendment effects law enforcement. In criminal cases, it is important that there is substantial evidence to reach a verdict. For the prosecution to obtain such evidence, they must perform a search and seizure. The Fourth Amendment protects citizens from unreasonable and unlawful search and seizures. It states that people have the right to secure their person and property from search and seizure without a warrant.…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Fourth Amendment protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures, but as the court case Katz v. United States 389 U.S. 347 (1967) “states that whatever a person knowingly exposes to the public even within one’s own house is not protected by the Fourth Amendment”. According to the Fourth amendment if a package is closed against inspection no matter where it is police must obtain a warrant to search it as if it were in your home. Unlike Mr. Greenwood who knowingly exposed his opaque trash bags on the curb for the trash collector to pick it up as to anyone or anything on the public street. Also the Fourth Amendment was not violated since the trash collector was going to be there to pick up the garbage in the neighborhood as usual and…

    • 144 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    William Daniels Ms. Read HN US History I November 30th, 2015 The Evolution of the Fourth Amendment After more than two hundred since the creation of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, are these documents, the foundation of our government and laws, still relevant today? To determine the relevancy of the Bill of Rights and the Constitution, this paper will examine the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment is“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures…(Fourth).”It was created in response to British officials unreasonably searching colonists and their belongings (Mclnnis).…

    • 1916 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Moot Court Case

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages

    DAVID FALLSBAUER’S RIGHTS UNDER THE FOURTH AMENDMENT WERE VIOLATED BY THE POLICE OFFICERS, BECAUSE WHEN FACED WITH AMBIGUITY REGARDING THE A THIRD PARTY’S CONSENT TO SEARCH THEY FAILED TO MAKE A FURTHER INQUIRY. BY DOING SO, THE OFFICERS VIOLATED DAVID’S RIGHT TO PRIVACY. The primary question before this Court is whether police officers must make a further inquiry when faced with an ambiguity regarding a third party’s consent to search. The Federal Circuit Courts of Appeals have taken different views when deciding the actions a police officer must take when faced with an ambiguity pertaining to third party consent. It is crucial to our society that a person’s right to privacy is protected and able to be exercised.…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fourth Amendment Do you know you have the right to say NO?. The Fourth Amendment in other words Search and Seizures allows one to say no until proper legal document or warrant is shown to search or seized someone’s home, car, personal item and to protect people rights to privacy from the government intrusions. Meaning the government can’t use police force in which would expose citizens. Also the Fourth Amendment respects people rights and that it should not be violated. The Fourth Amendment created a major impact in today’s society not many citizens; teenager and adult are aware of their Fourth Amendment rights.…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fourth Amendment: Search and Seizure In the Fourth Amendment, it states “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated” (Cornell University of Law). The Fourth Amendment states its main idea in this statement and through it American citizens and their belongings and records are protected from surveillance, searches, and seizures. However, in today’s digital world government officials have used what could be called an unconstitutional approach to the Fourth Amendment, causing them to monitor phone conversations. There have also been instances where personal records have been gained by law enforcement without any relevant reason.…

    • 1215 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fourth Amendment

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Amendment IV The fourth amendment is one of the primitive and mainly significant entitlements bestowed to the citizens of The United State of America; the law, distinctively states, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” What Does the Fourth Amendment Mean? The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution stipulates, the entitlement of individuals to be secure in their individualities, dwellings, documents, and possessions, against irrational searches…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The statement, “The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places,” is one of the most controversial statements in Criminal Procedure. The amendment’s purpose is to secure individuals’ rights to privacy within their houses, papers, and defends them against unreasonable searches and seizures. However, to what extent does the law preserve a person’s privacy? The Law of Search and Seizure and the Search Warrant, give the government strict to stipulations as to how they are able to rightfully obtain information that is presumed to be private. Although Searches, Seizures and Warrants seem to have simple guidelines, they are each intricate categories.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Search and seizure laws have been around since the beginning of the United States of America, and have a very controversial history. Many deem the way the laws are practiced unconstitutional, and oppressive to minorities, while others think they are just and need to be carried out to stop crime. Police officers have found many missing persons and have also brought down many drug dealers all while staying in the lines of legal search and seizure. Many people fear officers can overstep their boundaries and think that search and seizure laws are the underlying cause of mass incarceration, which Michelle Alexander examines in her book The New Jim Crow.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arrest warrants are issued to allow the police to identify and locate a person, or persons. These persons are usually those who have been previous arrest, released on bail, but then fail to show up to court after their release, in contrast a search warrant allows the police to enter into a promise, in search of evidence or contraband that may be used in an upcoming trial. In order to take possession of an item, and that property to be searched it must be specifically listed in the search warrant. The police are limited to only what is indicated in the warrant after its approved by a judge. ( John Worrall. 2013).…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays