The Importance Of Civil Disobedience In The United States

Improved Essays
The 1960s in the United States can only be described as a turbulent time, marked by the Vietnam War, the Civil Rights Movement, and the revolution in criminal process rights. The Vietnam War was not going smoothly and the American public, viewing the whole thing on the evening news, was growing increasingly disenchanted with the war effort. The Civil Rights Movement across the Southern states sought to resolve the prevailing problems remaining from Reconstruction, which drew violent backlash from the white majority. At the same time, the Supreme Court was defining and expanding the rights of suspects and defendants, ensuring that they were protected by the Constitution. Richard Milhous Nixon saw the 1968 election as his opportunity to finally win the Republican presidential nomination …show more content…
Those individuals then do not understand where civil disobedience is permissible and where it is simply breaking the law. The upswing in civil disobedience was of course attributed to the Civil Rights Movement which would culminate in decisions by the Warren Court in Brown v. Board of Education and Green v. County School Board of New Kent County. Brown would overturn Plessy v. Ferguson and declare racial segregation inherently unequal in the context of public education. Green enforced Brown, while establishing that a district court can determine the effectiveness of the plan. While Nixon viewed the Brown decision as the ‘correct’ one, he told Southern delegates that “Federal courts had pre-empted the authority of school boards in implementing desegregation decrees.” Spoken like a true politician three months before Election Day, Nixon continued, describing the appointment of Supreme Court justices who will interpret the law rather than attempt to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Civil Disobedience Thoreau declares, “The only obligation which I have a right to assume is to do at any time what I think is right” (Ogunye). He ostensibly acknowledges no authority other than that of his own moral sense. In this essay, civil disobedience will be defined as the unwillingness to obey civil laws in an attempt to prompt change in governmental law or procedure, demonstrated by the use of nonviolent methods. The matter in question, then, is whether such civil disobedience is justified in a democratic society. The value of this essay’s argument is fairness; that is, defending human rights and granting each his or her due.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As a result of these changes, the Civil Rights Movement struggled to gain enough support to fully resolve the issues upon which the movement began. However, Blacks began to become more politically active. The large amount of publicity and the powerful speeches from the early sixties combined with the push for black pride in the late sixties resulted in huge turnouts of black voters in the 1968 presidential election when compared to the election of 1960 (Doc. 6). In fact, many Southern states had either a rapidly growing minority or even a majority of voters for presidential candidates that favored pro-Civil Rights legislation (Doc. 7). Although Nixon won the election of 1968, black voters and supporters of the Civil Rights Movement began to become more politically active thanks to the attention brought to issues regarding Civil Rights as well as a surge of pride in ethnicity and…

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil Disobedience Dbq

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Both Dr. Martin Luther King’s letter from Birmingham city jail as well as Henry David Thoreau’s civil disobedience shows how we should all practice civil disobedience for justice and to right an unjust law or action. Which bring up the question of whether civil disobedience is effective or ineffective in achieving change? Based on history we see civil disobedience is an effective way to achieve change in democratic countries. Civil disobedience can only work in a democratic country because in a democracy the government gains all its power from the people. In the case of dr. martin Luther king, he executed a nonviolent movement with thousands of fellow citizens to achieve change.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil Disobedience Dbq

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As we take a look at the history of the United States, impacting a free society has not been easy. There have been many laws that have not treated everyone fairly. In order to impact a free society, many had to undergo civil disobedience in order to impact the free society that we live in today. Peaceful resistance to laws positively impact a free society. Without civil disobedience, it would have been almost impossible to make change in our society.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The 1960s is known as a turbulent political decade in the United States. The advent of the Vietnam War gave rise to the wave of anti-war protests that challenged policies of the President Johnson administration and opposed a mandatory draft instituted at the time. The anti-war protests, in turn, fueled the student movement with teachers and students alike staging “teach-ins” to show their opposition to the war. At the same time, this decade saw the emergence of the civil rights movement with African-American activists leading the struggle against segregation and Jim Crow laws still prevalent in southern states at the time. After years of legal challenges and peaceful protests, the civil rights movement culminated in the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965.…

    • 1734 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peaceful resistance to laws has the possibility of having a positive or negative impact upon a free society depending on the situation, but throughout history it has been proven that more often than not civil disobedience has brought positive change. It all depends upon circumstance when deciding whether or not something can be good or bad for a society and this includes civil disobedience. While it has impacted our society positively, there are ways for it to be abused by the masses in order for them to get what they want or for the result to turn out as less than desirable, though it is unlikely that it would ever work out that way. For example, Cohen states in Seven Arguments Against Civil Disobedience that one of the arguments…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The year of 1968 is known as one of the most chaotic years in American history because of the series of events such as protests, assassinations, political shifts and etc. helped shape the United States into what it is today, which is a center-right country on the political spectrum. The 1960’s in general was one of the most tumultuous times within the United States since the 1860’s. 1968 was the highest expression of the divisiveness throughout the 1960s. One reason for the political shift in 1968 is because of the failure of the liberal policies of the Johnson Administration, in particular the Great Society. President Johnson being a southerner from Texas was viewed by many people on the left as someone who shift to the right on the civil…

    • 855 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henry David Thoreau once said, in his article “Civil Disobedience,” that “All men recognize the right of revolution; that is, the right to refuse allegiance to, and to resist the government, when its tyranny or its inefficiency are great and unendurable.” When he stated this, Thoreau was writing in regard to civil disobedience and his refusal to pay taxes in protest of slavery and the government’s involvement in the Mexican-American War. Civil disobedience can refer to disobeying laws that are thought to be unjust or to using peaceful protests, demonstrations, sit-ins, and other measures to bring attention to significant issues. Thoreau’s statement is still relevant to the world today. Society can use acts of civil disobedience to change laws that are inequitable.…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When you think of the 1960s in America, what do you see? Zany pop culture? Flashy clothes? The birth of many pop icons? I don’t know what you think, but I always remember the controversy and constitutional issues that plagued our society as a whole and how they still affect us today.…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    U.S. Libraries in the 1960s The 1960s were a time of significant change for the United States, so much so this era is often referred to as “the rights revolution” (CrashCourse). The United States experienced the continuation of the Civil Rights Movement, the youngest elected president, John F. Kennedy—and the youngest president to die, the first manned moon landing, and seemingly everything in between. In a country that was so fraught with change, it only seems fitting that libraries were undergoing significant changes also.…

    • 1875 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil disobedience is a highly controversial subject, and I understand why. There is a huge difference between Martin Luther King Jr, and the riots that are going on right now because Donald Trump got elected as President. Dr. King's protests were peaceful and did not interrupt everyday life, even though he felt strongly about the subject. The protesters now are disrupting the streets and are committing arson and other crimes (such as burning the flag-which is illegal). Dr. King got a lot further getting societal support using his peaceful protests than these anti-Trump protesters are by burning things and hurting people.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil Disobedience and Its Relevance Today Back in the 1960's people such as Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King Jr. fought for civil rights. In the 2016, Leshia Evans is a protester for the Black Lives Matter movement and was detained by law enforcement officers near the police headquarters in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on Saturday, July 9. She was involved in a march for the death of Alton Sterling and did not resist arrest, she simply disobeyed the police officer's order to get back and then they arrested her. Civil Disobedience affected us positively in the civil rights movement in the 1960's, but now, I feel as if people don't put forth enough initiative for it to be effective in the “ Black Lives Matter “ movement.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I, personally, believe that civil disobedience is extremely effective and in the end produces a positive effect. In order for the movement to be effective, it has to directly affect a group or several groups of people. When these people feel that their rights or interests aren't being protected or violated, then they make a stand. Those who are gaining from their demise view these people with criticism or call their movement useless or a "threat to society." Back in the 1800s Henry David Thoreau wrote Civil Disobedience.…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The denotative meaning of civil disobedience is the refusal to obey laws as a way of forcing the government to do or change something. That "something" is usually a law or policy; but, in reality, how effective is civil disobedience by everyday citizens? Does peaceful resistance to laws positively or negatively impact a free society? The answer is not as clear cut as one might think; indeed, the results of civil disobedience are oftentimes subjective. On December 1, 1955, 42 year old Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat on a Montgomery, Alabama, bus to a white man.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This is supported by multiple instances of civil disobedience being used incorrectly or being misinterpreted. For example, a demonstration that is “a denial of rights to others” or protesters who transform into rioters. Van Dusen describes a civil disobedient again with “The civil disobedient, while deliberately violating a law shows an oblique respect for the law by voluntarily submitting to its sanctions” (Van Dusen 191) His point is structurally sound, but this essay was written in 1969. To put it mildly, the protesters or their demonstrations against the Vietnam War were not of the highest intellectual level, on the contrary, the protesters of our time aren’t much better, but ours are not a bunch of kids under the influence of drugs and trying to take down “The…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays