As the owner of a commercial enterprise, there are several aspects of operating a business organization that one ought to be mindful of. With the traditional routines of running a business, the owner should even be knowledgeable of laws that pertain to the business as well as the effects they may have. The incident that occurred at Springfield Arms Apartments brings about queries on where the accountability lies, with the owner or the trespasser. The responsibility is weighted legally as damages incurred. However this matter is handled by the owner reflects the kind of business ethics Springfield Arms Apartments is overseen by. By understanding the torts and ethics can shed some light on the aftermath.
On the evening of the event, the intruder forced his way into Sharon’s ground floor apartment. The trespasser gained entrance to the residence by damaging the lock of the sliding glass door as well as inflicting harm to both Sharon and the manager of the property Darryl. In this care, the intruder is legally responsible for the outcomes of his feats. As he was in the process of performing the crime, he will be charged for the criminal actions as well as for intentional torts. Also, the perpetrator will answer to the damages consequential from his actions. The laws, as well as court rulings, do recognize the various torts; no some of these torts can be obscure and sometimes never litigated. When it comes to the landlord’s legal duties and responsibilities in cases like Sharon’s break-in, “landlords have no duty to protect tenants from criminal attacks. As much as landlords and tenants have a special relationship that does not exist between a commercial establishment and its guests it follows that the same general principle of law extends to restaurants and their patrons” ” (Pagnattaro, Cahoy, Magid, Reed, & Shedd, 2016). In the case of Sharon, the landlord is responsible for making sure any issues with the building are corrected as soon as possible. With Darryl the situation can vary, for instance if Darryl was off duty when the incident occurs, the landlord has no legal responsibility; but, if he happened to be on the clock then there may be liability and workman’s compensation will need to be filed. Negligence is the key issue here, the failure to exercise the level of caution that is necessary in a situation such as this. The intruder has produced physical bodily harm to Sharon and Darryl as well as damage to the property. By doing so, the individual that committed this crime is legally responsible for compensating 100% of all damages or harm that occurred as a result of the incident to all parties involved. An intentional tort is a form of civil wrongdoing, during which a person has the yearning to bring forth particular outcomes; in some circumstances, it can contain substantially likely be caused by …show more content…
Intentional torts come in various forms; for starter’s assault, this is intentionally placing another individual in immediate fear for his or her physical well-being. Then there is battery, or deliberately making unwanted physical contact without another person‘s permission. Another form is trespass; this is entering someone’s property with no permission or staying after being asked to leave. In the case of Sharon’s intruder he would be legally responsible in addition to the possibility of being charged with all the intentional torts mentioned above. Assault in addition to battery for producing harm to both Sharon as well as Darryl; also trespassing into an apartment he was not welcomed …show more content…
As a property landlord, committing yourself to delivering excellent service to the tenants is imperative no matter who you are dealing with. Striving to develop a beneficial business association with tenants, maintenance team, staff, as well as potential renters is also very important in order to be successful. In addition to the previously mentioned being well-mannered, pay attention to residents as well as staff, while working with them to resolve any concerns they may have is also significant. As a property-owner, it is vital to remember you are representing both your business and yourself.
There are rules and regulations to protect landlord and tenants relations based on ethical values and legal requirements of every country. However, moral values cannot be taught or imposed and vary from one individual to another. The basic fact is those landlords who have very high moral standards and respect ethical values will always have quality
On the evening of the event, the intruder forced his way into Sharon’s ground floor apartment. The trespasser gained entrance to the residence by damaging the lock of the sliding glass door as well as inflicting harm to both Sharon and the manager of the property Darryl. In this care, the intruder is legally responsible for the outcomes of his feats. As he was in the process of performing the crime, he will be charged for the criminal actions as well as for intentional torts. Also, the perpetrator will answer to the damages consequential from his actions. The laws, as well as court rulings, do recognize the various torts; no some of these torts can be obscure and sometimes never litigated. When it comes to the landlord’s legal duties and responsibilities in cases like Sharon’s break-in, “landlords have no duty to protect tenants from criminal attacks. As much as landlords and tenants have a special relationship that does not exist between a commercial establishment and its guests it follows that the same general principle of law extends to restaurants and their patrons” ” (Pagnattaro, Cahoy, Magid, Reed, & Shedd, 2016). In the case of Sharon, the landlord is responsible for making sure any issues with the building are corrected as soon as possible. With Darryl the situation can vary, for instance if Darryl was off duty when the incident occurs, the landlord has no legal responsibility; but, if he happened to be on the clock then there may be liability and workman’s compensation will need to be filed. Negligence is the key issue here, the failure to exercise the level of caution that is necessary in a situation such as this. The intruder has produced physical bodily harm to Sharon and Darryl as well as damage to the property. By doing so, the individual that committed this crime is legally responsible for compensating 100% of all damages or harm that occurred as a result of the incident to all parties involved. An intentional tort is a form of civil wrongdoing, during which a person has the yearning to bring forth particular outcomes; in some circumstances, it can contain substantially likely be caused by …show more content…
Intentional torts come in various forms; for starter’s assault, this is intentionally placing another individual in immediate fear for his or her physical well-being. Then there is battery, or deliberately making unwanted physical contact without another person‘s permission. Another form is trespass; this is entering someone’s property with no permission or staying after being asked to leave. In the case of Sharon’s intruder he would be legally responsible in addition to the possibility of being charged with all the intentional torts mentioned above. Assault in addition to battery for producing harm to both Sharon as well as Darryl; also trespassing into an apartment he was not welcomed …show more content…
As a property landlord, committing yourself to delivering excellent service to the tenants is imperative no matter who you are dealing with. Striving to develop a beneficial business association with tenants, maintenance team, staff, as well as potential renters is also very important in order to be successful. In addition to the previously mentioned being well-mannered, pay attention to residents as well as staff, while working with them to resolve any concerns they may have is also significant. As a property-owner, it is vital to remember you are representing both your business and yourself.
There are rules and regulations to protect landlord and tenants relations based on ethical values and legal requirements of every country. However, moral values cannot be taught or imposed and vary from one individual to another. The basic fact is those landlords who have very high moral standards and respect ethical values will always have quality