Racial assortment within a society additionally contributes to the breakdown of a regulated system, showing how a population cannot be restricted. A controlling force, like the British empire cannot sustain its influence after India’s natives respect their own culture and other ethnic groups. The reason why Aziz is so successful, is due to the fact that he accepts British people. He seeks the opportunities and benefits that resonate with possessing many social interactions over a wide range of a variety of individuals. Fielding, is an occidental, a man of British descent from the West and Aziz believes him to be “a very nice chap [...] and [his] best friend” (Forster 280). The significance in their relationship is that Aziz gets traction in
…show more content…
The entire population is one collective power since there are no superior and inferior individuals. With that, comes the abolishment of orientalism. The objectification and commodification of native cultures is eradicated if the natives and the colonizer respect one another. Aziz and Fielding imagine of a time when all of the imperialism in India will go away, and how when “India [is] a nation! [They] shall be [true] friends” (Forster 362). It is when India is its own nation, that Aziz can be deeply considered by others to be someone who is not inferior, but someone who is equal and as good as any other Western person. That is why Aziz demonstrates the persistence and stubbornness that a ruled nation possesses when striving for a grasp of freedom. The end result is glorious as those who are deprived of freedom seek it out. Those who are constricted the most wish to rebel the most. It is after this struggle, that people of the East will no longer be segregated, labelled, and stereotyped by the West. Thus, demonstrating the significance of embracing ethnic diversity in tearing down a system that is controlled by a dominant class and the fact that there is nothing able to prevent people from who desire …show more content…
Correspondingly, the author argues that there is no stopping a liberty deprived nation whose people have an innate desire for independence. In the circumstance where one unconditionally acknowledges their own culture, a sense of nationalism develops in favour of that culture, that encourages individuals to stand up for the culture that is apart of themselves. On the other hand, when the society accepts ethnic differentiation, superior and inferior classes can be abolished, resulting in a liberated civilisation. Within the physical world, Forster’s arguments along with their respective notions can be directly observed. India was a colony of the British empire, however, by the end of 1947, India achieved independence. It is astounding to imagine how a large intolerant group of people can change so much as to become accepting of one another. Today, there are still issues regarding racism and the significance of race within one’s life. It is the reason why it is so important not base someone’s identity simply off their race. As John F. Kennedy stated, “"if we cannot now end our differences, at least we can help make the world safe for
The entire population is one collective power since there are no superior and inferior individuals. With that, comes the abolishment of orientalism. The objectification and commodification of native cultures is eradicated if the natives and the colonizer respect one another. Aziz and Fielding imagine of a time when all of the imperialism in India will go away, and how when “India [is] a nation! [They] shall be [true] friends” (Forster 362). It is when India is its own nation, that Aziz can be deeply considered by others to be someone who is not inferior, but someone who is equal and as good as any other Western person. That is why Aziz demonstrates the persistence and stubbornness that a ruled nation possesses when striving for a grasp of freedom. The end result is glorious as those who are deprived of freedom seek it out. Those who are constricted the most wish to rebel the most. It is after this struggle, that people of the East will no longer be segregated, labelled, and stereotyped by the West. Thus, demonstrating the significance of embracing ethnic diversity in tearing down a system that is controlled by a dominant class and the fact that there is nothing able to prevent people from who desire …show more content…
Correspondingly, the author argues that there is no stopping a liberty deprived nation whose people have an innate desire for independence. In the circumstance where one unconditionally acknowledges their own culture, a sense of nationalism develops in favour of that culture, that encourages individuals to stand up for the culture that is apart of themselves. On the other hand, when the society accepts ethnic differentiation, superior and inferior classes can be abolished, resulting in a liberated civilisation. Within the physical world, Forster’s arguments along with their respective notions can be directly observed. India was a colony of the British empire, however, by the end of 1947, India achieved independence. It is astounding to imagine how a large intolerant group of people can change so much as to become accepting of one another. Today, there are still issues regarding racism and the significance of race within one’s life. It is the reason why it is so important not base someone’s identity simply off their race. As John F. Kennedy stated, “"if we cannot now end our differences, at least we can help make the world safe for