Argumentative Essay-Face It, Art Is Art

Face it, Art is Art To be considered an artist is debatable. If one can be considered an artist, and if their work should even be considered as art, is argued constantly, but the truth is, no one can define an artist as one solid definition. The exact definition of art is considered: a wide variety of possessions and effects a person can show, create or capture. So, when it comes to photography, it shouldn 't be questionable if the photos themselves are art or not. They should be, because of the fact that through an image, painting or photo, the artist is able to capture an emotion and allow the viewers to see and feel the emotions they wanted to express.
To begin this argument, the fact that most people know more famous pictures are known around the world better than paintings are. Because a photo can be copied and sent to different media and billboards, it has a better chance of being recognized by …show more content…
Jones was stated to believe that photography should not be considered as an art because it was a waste of space. “A photograph in a gallery is a flat, soulless, superficial substitute for painting.” While on the opposing viewpoint, Sean O’Hagan believes that it is an art because “Photography is the art of real life – however, manipulated. And real life creates true art.” Photography has developed throughout the past years, and because this debate happened in 2014 doesn’t make it any less of an issue to determine. George Boudman has been an art teacher for many years. He has taught within many different forms of art and studied Advertising and Design in college. His credentials are well respected when he explains why he does believe that photography is an art. “I believe that photography is, in fact, an art and that a camera is one of the many tools that is used by artists just like paint and pencils,”