Karl Marx's Analysis Of My Anti-Social Personality

Superior Essays
Coming from money has made myself anti-social in some regard. I tend to avoid interactions with people and I’m extremely weary of meeting and befriending new people because throughout my life I have been hurt time and time again from people creating false relationships and friendships with me because they knew I had money. After constantly having to keep my guard up and evaluate every person I meet and decide if they like me or my money, I have concluded it is just easier to keep my current friends, who I know and love, and avoid making new ones. This made it extremely hard to transition to college where I didn’t have any of my friends from back home. My anti-social personality fostered from years of being used made it very hard for me to meet new friends at Syracuse University. Even to this day, as a junior in college, I only have a select small group of friends, and go out rarely.
In addition,
…show more content…
Power stemming from a position in some organization can be traced back thousands of years, such as ancient Egyptian pharaohs, emperors of Rome, and Native American tribe leaders. However, the structural aspect of power has a much more recent history. “A careful review of sociological constructs of power reveals a striking similarity between classical and contemporary conceptions. Marx 's analysis of the capitalist labor market and Weber 's analysis of modern bureaucracies offer valuable clues to the important insight that power can be a structurally determined potential for unequal resource distributions that favors some actors at the expense of others” (Corra). Marx states that structural power resulted from the exploitative relations in material production, resulting from the ownership relations of the means of production, and guess who, historically, especially in the United States owned the means of production? You guessed right, wealthy, white,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The term he used in this article called “power-over” which requires the domination or even the oppression of others, while the other type of relationship talked about is the “power-with” which looks at bringing collective energy with the result being able to act together (Kuyek 2011). A clear understanding in our modern-day society of who has the most “power-over” influence is corporations within western capitalism society because this term “power-over” depends on the control of capital, resources, and force that all play a significant influence on the government’s agenda due to their corporate organizational capabilities. Power-over can also be seen in non-monetary form as well through either physical or psychological force of dominance in many forms which can include spousal abuse, genocides, wars, racism, gangs, and even schoolyard power struggles (Kuyek 2011). With our economic system in Canada, we can see the social welfare system has become a punitive and complex system that is hard to understand truly. Power everywhere is often synonymous with money.…

    • 1031 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Caitlyn Jenner herself was quoted saying that “the hardest part about being a woman is figuring out what to wear.” Many consider it stunning progress that we have successfully integrated transgender women into the pages of our largest magazines and onto our television screens. However, an identity for transgender women was never established outside of the traditional female archetypes that support the perpetuation of Capitalism. Dozens of transgender women, especially transgender women of color, have been murdered in the past year.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Robert Moses Summary

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Abraham Lincoln famously remarked that “Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man’s character, give him power.” The power belongs to those who want to get the top position in organizations with personal qualities, such as leadership, humility, ambition, etc. In this book, Jeffrey Pfeffer examines how to get the power from the individuals’ perspective to make and implement decisions by considering various situations. Also, he describes that power is a positive mechanism in managing the organizations effectively since he has also viewed it as obtained common profits or gains through collectively working together. Such opinion of him about power is diametrically opposed to our common norm that power connotes a conservative…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Event Description In my childhood, I have experienced different types of friends from elementary to college. Friends of different personalities that hung out with people of a different crowd at school. For each group of friends, I have a different personality. When I hung out with so called “popular people”, I acted as if having a boyfriend was life, so supportive when they are depressed and act as if drama surrounded me.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    YeJoon Kang HST 103_06 Professor Borbonus 10 February 2015 Karl Marx & Samuel Smiles During the time of Industrialization, Europe and the United States were the leading exporters in the global markets. It was most difficult for the working class when there was an abundant amount of supplies, also known as surplus of products once in demand. One of many reasons they were suffering was because; “As more and more factories were built to produce the same commodity…competitors slashed prices by slashing wages” (Marks 136). Many similar problems were practiced in the time.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People have always value their privacy. From fence building, to secret keeping, we love to think our thoughts and conversations are as private as they can be. As our society evolves, our rights keep expending. In the past, the workplace was what we would determine to be strict rules and regulations. In order to preserve the peace and order at work, people would be be punished, in a way we would now consider that to be inhumane.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay I will explain Karl Marx’s conception of the development of the bourgeoisie, the development of the proletariat and where Marx sees this struggle leads to. I will also explain the bourgeoisie's relationship to feudalism. I will then discuss how capitalism has limited human freedom and what Herbert Marcuse thinks capitalism has done to individual humans. At the end, I will analyze Marx and Marcuse’s criticisms and I will explain my opinion on their criticisms. Karl Marx is an economist and a philosopher that writes about the bourgeoisie and the proletariats.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How Do You Define Power? Per Kerry Ferris and Jill Stein of “Real World an Introduction to Sociology” “Power is the ability to control the actions of others. Whether it is coercive power (backed by the threat of force) or merely influential power (supported by persuasion), leadership involves getting people to do things they may or may not want to do” (142). Power can be exploited in families, society, institutions or the government, and how that power is delivered will determine the outcome. Moreover, the family structure has a lot to do with how the government, society, and institutions are run, since the family helped in shaping the personality and the behavior of an individual. Since, power struggles began in the family, who will control…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Karl Marx criticizes capitalism in a multitude of his essays, including the Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. His critique of capitalism varies from the exploitation of workers to the instability of the capitalist system, but fundamentally his issue with capitalism is the dehumanization of laborers. Marx argues that under capitalism, laborers are dehumanized because they are alienated, or disconnected from fundamental human properties, in four aspects – products of labor, labor, species-being, and human-human relations. The basis of Marx’s theory of alienation is the laborer’s estrangement from his labor, which arises from alienation from the laborer’s object of production. According to Marx in the Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844, “the object which labour produces – labour’s product – confronts it as something alien, as a power independent of the producer” (71).…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This essay will compare and critically evaluate the conceptions of power and domination that is found in the social theories of Karl Marx, Max Weber and Michel Foucault, and explain which of these theories are the most compelling to understanding how power works in the todays modern contemporary setting. To illustrate and argue this point, this essay will explore and evaluate examples in the modern setting on the operation of power. This essay will explore the works of these three social theorists and discuss and contend on which (if any) theories by Marx, Weber or Foucault apply to modernity. This paper will begin by outlining and analysing each of the fundamental key theories from the three social theorists aforementioned, compare and contrast…

    • 1874 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Power is an important concept for the critical theorists .critical theorists view power as a ‘’defining ,ubiquitous feature of the organisational life,(Mumby.2001:585 and Miller,2015:118) matters related to power ,control and dominance are crucial to all critical theorists whether they are economic, social or communicative, when looking at the concept power ,one has to look at three approaches ,the first approach is traditional approach sees power as quite stable entity that people and groups have. Traditional approach researchers ask questions about issues that lead to organisational power and effects of power on outcomes such as job satisfaction and performance .the scholars usually compare power with hierarchical status in organisations, (Miller, 2015:…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Social theorists, writers and philosophers of almost every time period have examined the convoluted relationship between social relations and individuals including Karl Marx and Georg Simmel. While some have taken the approach that individuals are shaped by their social world, others insist that the social world itself is what shapes individuals. There are a few theories that exist with regards to the connection between individuals and society which will be discussed throughout this short essay in order to fully explain the relationship between individuals and society. Starting off with the conflict theory by Karl Marx, he was primarily focused on the structures of society. The conflict theory is one of the fundamental ideologies that explains social life as a battle between social groups for power and scarce resources.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim and Max Weber are three fundamental figureheads in the foundation of sociology who asserted that our lifestyles are products of the society in which we live. They all lived in a period of great social change, that of the Industrial Revolution, and based their writings and musings upon what they observed happening around them and extrapolated as to the condition of the future. One foundational product of contemporary societies, that truly came into existence at the time during which they were writing, would be the economy and economic life. Looking at it on a macro level perspective, it is one of the aspects of the social superstructure. It is a social institution by itself, but it also shares a give and take relationship with other institutions in society and the superstructure such as education, ethics, law, religion, etc.…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The theory of alienation is ‘the intellectual construct in which Marx displays the devastating effect of capitalist production on human beings, on their physical and mental states and on the social processes of which they are a part’ (Ollman, 1996). Marx’s theory is based on the observation that within the capitalist mode of production, workers invariably lose determination of their lives by being deprived of the right to regard themselves as the director of their actions. Alienation refers to the social alienation of people from aspects of their human nature and can be defined as a condition whereby individuals are governed by institutes of their own creation in capitalist society such as; religion, the state and economy, all of which are…

    • 1914 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marx's Class Theory Essay

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Marx's class theory determines what class you belong to depending on your means of production, meaning who owned the assets necessary to produce what people needed in order to survive. The people who owned the most land and factories were considered to be higher up in the social class hierarchy, also known as the first class the bourgeoisie. They would then control all of the elements in society as well as having control over the working class. Then there is the second class known as the proletariat, these were the people of the lower class who worked in the factories or land owned by the bourgeoisie for hourly wages. This shows that using Marx theory is a quick and simple way to determine someone’s rank in society.…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays