"Our work is not driven by the pleasure of harming an animal..."- Science Now. Animal research has contributed to provide treatments for many diseases that can cause death for many years. It had a significant affect on improving medication for both humans and animals. We can’t doubt that these researches have a negative affect on animals, since they suffer much from experiments and procedures that need to be made for research, but it’s a scientific necessity. Therefore based on peer-reviewed articles I went through the way to solve this issue is by resuming researches but at the same time make animals suffer less and provide them with a healthy positive environment within the ethical framework.
The first perspective is to place …show more content…
In fact they don’t even get to die comfortably and die easily and quickly. According to Rollin (2012), The enormous majority of animals “euthanized” for research purposes don’t get to have a painless death; asphyxiation or suffocation by inhaled carbon dioxide is not at all a humane way, though its approved by the American Veterinary Medical Association. Researchers are allowed to kill animals in this unquestionably painful way and clearly getting rid of animals by letting them inhale carbon dioxide is unacceptable. Researchers should place and provide animals with best possible living condition in order to have a positive impact on the animals. Also Rollin’s (2012) study found the following: Attention not only to physical needs and control of physical pain, but also to accommodating animal “telos” in a manner that eliminates all forms of “negative mattering” for the animals and provides occasions for “positive mattering”—what we may call “animal happiness”—can go a long way toward making animal research a moral science. (p. 5). There should be specific feeding schedules; also animals should be placed in an environment where they can move freely. …show more content…
As we know the only purpose of animal research is providing treatment to diseases that affect both human being and animals. What I believe scientists should work on is providing a perfectly social interacting healthy environment to all the animals being tested. “One 's philosophy is not best expressed in words; it is expressed in the choices one makes... and the choices we make are ultimately our responsibility.” Since we chose to manipulate animals to improve science, therefore we are the ones who take responsibility to provide them with care as best as
The first perspective is to place …show more content…
In fact they don’t even get to die comfortably and die easily and quickly. According to Rollin (2012), The enormous majority of animals “euthanized” for research purposes don’t get to have a painless death; asphyxiation or suffocation by inhaled carbon dioxide is not at all a humane way, though its approved by the American Veterinary Medical Association. Researchers are allowed to kill animals in this unquestionably painful way and clearly getting rid of animals by letting them inhale carbon dioxide is unacceptable. Researchers should place and provide animals with best possible living condition in order to have a positive impact on the animals. Also Rollin’s (2012) study found the following: Attention not only to physical needs and control of physical pain, but also to accommodating animal “telos” in a manner that eliminates all forms of “negative mattering” for the animals and provides occasions for “positive mattering”—what we may call “animal happiness”—can go a long way toward making animal research a moral science. (p. 5). There should be specific feeding schedules; also animals should be placed in an environment where they can move freely. …show more content…
As we know the only purpose of animal research is providing treatment to diseases that affect both human being and animals. What I believe scientists should work on is providing a perfectly social interacting healthy environment to all the animals being tested. “One 's philosophy is not best expressed in words; it is expressed in the choices one makes... and the choices we make are ultimately our responsibility.” Since we chose to manipulate animals to improve science, therefore we are the ones who take responsibility to provide them with care as best as