Non Human Animals Essay

Great Essays
Since the beginning of time, non-human animals have played an important part in the sustenance of human beings. In the ecosystem, co-existence of biotic components that are, micro-organisms, plants, animals, humans and the abiotic components, in a balanced way has resulted in the developed world we live in. The absence or lack of even the minutest beings from/on the earth can impact the ecosystem to a great extent. Still, some people consider that humans are far more superior to any other animal by due to anthropocentric notions. We are aware of the fact that humans are capable of reaching pinnacles which we have not even imagined yet. However, are we taking ascendance of this by exploiting other beings to fulfill our needs? Is it ethical to consume animal products as it requires animals to make a sacrifice? Is it okay to kill or induce harm to animals just because we feel it is …show more content…
The issue with the topic about ‘pain in animals’ arises because the non-human animals cannot report their problems in terms of language, so the seriousness and the suffering cannot be equated with human (or individual’s) pain without any scientific method to give correlation between both kinds of pain. We cannot deny that animals do express/emote when they are in pain or danger in some way or the other, but that’s the only way we can figure out if an animal is experiencing pain. Vertebrates such as dogs, cats, alligators etc nurse their wounds, make sounds when they experience distress and tend to avoid situations which can be pain-inducing. There is also a good case that invertebrates also feel some amount of pain. We cannot measure the amount of pain that an animal goes through but we do know that there is at least some harm caused to an animal when they are being utilized as commodities and not as living beings by humans. Evolutionary biologist Robyn J. Crook has argued

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Herzog Human Morality

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Some may see us humans as the most powerful race, and as Herzog states it, “Research with animals is based on the premise that a ‘superior’ species has the right to breed, kidnap, or kill members…

    • 1432 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The way society treats animal is inhumane and should change because they can feel pain. In the article, “Hooked on a Myth” by Victoria Braithwaite she explains that fish have similar responses to pain as humans do. Braithwaite wrote, “Well, fish find these naturally irritating chemicals unpleasant too. Their gills beat faster, and they rub…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is easy for us as humans to view ourselves as superior to many non-human entities since we cannot empathize with them, but it is a perspective that many Americans need to change. This notion of false superiority is a focal point in Abram’s text, as he denounces “the Great Chain of Being”, a hierarchical continuum that places man above everything except angels and God. Abram states that instead of being at the top of this chain, we are in the midst of it; “We may cast our gaze downward to watch the field of mice and the insects that creep along the bending grasses… yet, at the same moment, hawks soaring on great winds gaze down upon our endeavors,” (49). I believe this is true to some extent, we coexist with the animal and plant species around us, and rely on them to aid in decomposition, pollination, producing oxygen, amongst other deeds, but being the only species able to change our environment to fit our needs does give us an advantage over all other aspects of the natural world. Therefore, mankind must find a way to balance the two modes of thinking – viewing ourselves at the top of chain and in the midst of it.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Why Animals Shouldn't Be Tested On What?'' animals are being tested on, this is not right or fair! First, you see, animals feel pain just like us. According to Amy Cameron ''…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If animals are allowed to prey on other animals, then humans are allowed as well. The counter argument is that we abuse our animals through the farm industries. Meat industries and farms abuse the natural lifestyle of animals so eating animals as the "circle of life" is invalid. In my point of view, animals are here to serve us but we are abusing…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    My sophomore year, happen all too fast, but one detail I remember the most was the Animal Project. I was excited to when the Animal Project was first assigned to pick the animal of our choice. Being that I have an interest in animals, but reptiles the most so I decided upon an anaconda. I remember waking up bright and early one morning the sun had, yet peeked from behind the clouds. It was pitch black I could see nothing through my window, but the gleaming streetlights.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animals and the Environment Specisism says that all humans are better than animals. There are two types of theorists when it comes to animal welfare: traditionalists and abolitionists. The arguments for animal welfare is that they provide food and there is no pain in going through with animal welfare. The only persons who don’t benefit from animal welfare are vegans and vegetarians because they don’t eat any type of meat. Another argument for animal welfare is experimentation.…

    • 1050 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Farm Essay

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Texts are commonly written as an expression of the attitudes or ideas within a certain time period. Furthermore, the way in which these texts are produced often reflect the social and political sensitivity at that certain time. During the mid-1930s, George Orwell like many of his literary partners became progressively more observant of the social and political concerns of the era. Orwell’s knowledge of the social sensitivity at the time allowed him to decide upon a proper medium through which he could communicate his message safely. This contrasts modern literature, represented in weddings and beheadings, in this text, the cruel nature of the topic is not euphemised, rather, the cruel nature of the topic is enhanced and strategically used by…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They are able to feel pain just as us humans do, thus, making it immoral to treat them critically. This theory positively promotes the awareness of animal rights and welfare. We ought to consider the animals needs before concluding our own happiness as they are the ones that…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    That being said, animals have the ability to feel pain and suffer as humans do. Singer states that “the grounds for inferring that these animals can feel pain are nearly as good as the grounds for inferring other humans do” (135). Pretty much Singer means that there is no way to prove whether other humans or animals feel pain and there is about the same amount of evidence for each. Humans and animals both have similar nervous systems and both react the same way to pain.…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nearly 15 years ago, I was in the first grade being asked to draw the person I imagined myself to be when I grew up. My picture portrayed me and several different types of animals at a veterinary clinic with the explanation stating, “When I grow up, I want to be a vet because I want to help animals.” I grew up an only-child and was devoted to all types of animals as if they were part of my family. For as long as I can remember I have wanted to be a vet. As a child, I would pretend to do surgery by stitching together holes in my stuffed animals.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is only wrong if the hunter is killing the animal as a “just because” reason. It should only be morally acceptable if the hunter is killing the animal for food for survival. Another debatable topic is over whether killing animals should be against the law.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Welfare Essay

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the world today, people cannot do without animals because they have become an essential part of human existence to both vegetarians and meat eaters. Some animals serve as pet, and some serve as food, and others are used for sports and laboratory experiments. Although some animal activist advocates for animal rights, there are limits to that right because animals cannot be equal with human. They don’t have the intellectual ability that humans have to take responsibilities and control what happens around them. These animals are important in the society and the need to treat them with respect is paramount.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wild animals are keeping in captivity for different reasons and in different places like zoos, circus and for researches. In my opinion, I am not like animals keeping in captivity for any reason because they are also living things like us. Animals kept in captivity are like a good family outing to some people but for others, it is like an animal is a cell of prison. The discussion of whether or not animals should be held in captivity is one that will not stop. The discussions go both ways.…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Most animals live and travel in groups for survival. As a pack or herd, they are able to protect each other from predators, find food more easily, and reproduce. Being around others of the same species gives them a sense of security. While some argue that humans do the same, people are more complicated than animals. They group together for more than just safety.…

    • 2164 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays