Political Appointments In Ancient Rome

Improved Essays
In similarity to most aspects of ancient Roman society, the process of political appointments were based on longstanding tradition, or at least the impression of tradition. With an importance stressed on the individual, rather that political affiliations, the way that a Roman would prepare himself for office was with the building of his public reputation. Much of the identity for the elite Roman man was based on deep rooted ideals of honor and masculinity, but these were arguably not the most important aspects of a politician’s public persona. A politician was expected to embody all that was Roman, and this had very few exceptions. Although many men would go about this in their own particular way there were four specific aspects that would help sculpt this ideal; successful military service, elite family lineage, …show more content…
This could be anything from the building of small temporary theaters, to giant circuses for sporting events. All of these are displays of Romans using their money to win over political popularity. While this started out as small scale performances, as the Empire grew so did the wealth of the elites, leading to substantial increases in this type of self-advancement. In fact, these events grew more prevalent they eventually became a central part of life within Rome. If one did not want to, or have the means to host a large event, they could always turn to the charitable contribution of grain. With the majority of Rome 's population living in far less luxury than that of the Patrician class, a man of political aspirations could simply garner support through the donation of food. Sometimes this was a flat donation to the populous, and other times it was a discount of the pricing. Either way, records reflect that this was not quickly forgotten, and that the mass of Rome would remember those who had been charitable, especially in times of greater

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Roman Empire was a better empire than the Athenian Empire. Charistrics of a good government include; allowing many people be citizens, which is good because the government would have more people supporting and expanding the government; giving citizens many rights, which is also good because it gives citizens rights so they can make the government stronger, and by having a senate because it ensures the decisions and laws are correct. The first reason the Roman Empire had a better government than the Athenian government is because of the Roman Senate. The Roman Senate was made up of 300 men who inherited their spots.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Cicero was so respected by the Senate that they said they owed their lives to him—this shows that he had gained the respect of not only the citizens of Rome, but also the…

    • 1314 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Gracchi Brothers Rebellion

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One of the unique features of public service in the Roman Republic was the delicate balance between refining Rome and gratifying the aristocracy that overpopulated every legislative body. Those courageous enough to defy typical conventions and the hierarchy of Roman politics encountered delightfully diverse methods of death. The most notable examples of Roman politicians who died in infamy were Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus, tribunes who encouraged populist land reforms and repeatedly flouted the limits of their power. While their reforms were necessary, the Gracchi brothers’ rebellion further engendered an authoritarian relationship between the controlling Senate and Consuls, thereby portraying them as selfish enemies of the state, and weakened…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Much of any political leader’s success can be attributed to public image. Without the support of those under one’s power, one’s authority does not last long. As Augustus finalized Rome’s transition from a republic to an empire, his public image through military success, information on his private life, and various forms of propaganda—and the subsequent support from the people—was the basis of his power. A leader’s performance while commanding an army was an essential part in winning loyalty from both the senate and the people. A great deal of respect was earned through success in battle, and was equated to a man’s ability to lead in government.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ancient Rome DBQ

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Imagine, you are safe in a controlled city, you are healthy and enjoying a nice bath, or eating a feast in the dining hall. This is what it was like for most Romans from about 50 BCE until the year of 200 CE. At this time, Rome was the superpower of the Mediterranean World and Rome’s territory, wealth and popularity were well known (Background Essay). Although Rome was prospering, it was slowly starting to fall apart due to poor leadership, a weak military and invasion of outsiders. Poor leadership was a big contributing factor to the fall of the Roman Empire.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Destiny Feggins HIS-111 Quality of Life in Ancient Rome Within these two articles, “Pleasures and Excess in the Roman Empire” by Paul Veyne and “Slums, Sanitation, and Mortality in the Roman World” by Alexis Scobie, we learn about the history of how the Roman society worked as well as gain insight through the theories created in what could have possibly been going on in the everyday life of Roman citizens. We get to delve in the social scales of the people including how/ where they lived and what they were capable of achieving while building up their empire. Historian Paul Veyne tells us a bit about the way society worked out within the Roman Empire and how the people were greatly appreciative of their social hierarchy, enjoyed the finer things…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction The Senate of Rome was the first actual representation of republic system around the world and played a pivotal role in Roman politics, it transformed from the advisory agency to the most authoritative political power of Rome. On the other hand, the senate not only make great influences and important decisions for Rome, but served as the foundation of the modern republic system. In this extent, it is vitally important to understand the history of the Roman Senate in order to understand the Roman society and political life in a broad perspective and the development of future global politics, especially republic system. In this essay, I will go through the history and the development of the senate and analyze how and in what extent…

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Roman government had not regulatory unit that could limit its power or stop it when corruption is alive. This freedom allowed for “civil discord” to happen(). Government officials, such as senators, military officials, and advisors fought to keep their positions. They used their area of influence to their own benefits. “The emperor’s advisors also attempted to maintain their influence by attacking their rivals, as seen in the attacks on Stilicho and Aetius.”…

    • 1933 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Many men across Italy fought for the right to vote in Roman elections. Keeping the Roman government free of…

    • 1862 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People with money could buy senate seats. Tax collectors were also corrupt, taking money from the people and keeping it for themselves. Rome had…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Save The Roman Republic

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Pages

    However, none of this would matter if it was all for the common good of Rome and to save the republic, except there wasn’t a true republic to save. Most of the senators were in their position of power because of their families and their wealth. Consequently some of the senators looked down upon the citizens such as when Casca said “if Caesar had stabbed their mothers, they would’ve forgiven him”(I,ii,269-270) to criticize the people of Rome. Their similar backgrounds likely meant that they rarely had opposing viewpoints. The Roman people did not have the same background as the senators and, the citizens’ views were rarely properly represented by these senators.…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Roman Republic was in control of many regions and not all of these inhabitants were delighted with the current circumstances, especially the citizens in Rome. During the period of the expansion of Rome, the government was becoming less democratic and started displaying signs of an oligarchy. The Senate of the Roman Republic was the prime branch of government. This was comprised of leaders from the patricians, the noble, and wealthy families of ancient Rome. Members of the senate were not elected but were chosen by the Consuls.2 The senate’s main task was to direct spending and verdicts associating with foreign powers.…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    MacKenzie Merrick Professor Elliott AH 2110 October 16th, 2015 Rome and Us: Our Similarities and Differences The society and culture of Rome have a variety of things in common with and opposite of that of the world today. Examples of this can relate to Rome and modern societies worldwide in several ways. Relations between the United States and Rome include political structure, religious activity, innovation or technology, artistic and architectural qualities, social and economic division, and everyday activities. Methods by which politicians gain notoriety was very similar in Rome to how it is in the United States.…

    • 1933 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Within the Roman Republic there were many competitions and the rewards that could be achieved tend to be great, coming with power and wealth. The goal for most of the people in Rome was to gain the power to become part of the consulship and Senate (Holland 125). One could gain their power through either their brains or their brawns.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Augustus and Caesar: A Comparison Julius Caesar remains one of history’s best generals and propagandists. However, Caesar’s reign came to a quick and brutal end with his assassination. In contrast, Caesar’s inexperienced nephew Augustus would go on to succeed where Caesar failed. Augustus’s rule was long, and inarguably successful. While Augustus’s comparative success might appear to result from historical contingencies, a closer examination reveals that was Augustus was a much shrewder politician than Caesar.…

    • 1606 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays