However, he sees that “technology has political qualities, and embodies specific forms of technology” (p.19).He uses the two technologies that Lewis Mumford introduces, namely authoritarian, and democratic technology. Authoritarian technology is “system-centered, immensely powerful, but unstable” (Winner, 1989, p.19). Nuclear power is a good example of authoritarian technology because it requires a lot of control to avoid instability despite being powerful. In contrast, Democratic technology is “man-centered, week, but resourceful, and durable” (Winner, 1989, p.19). For example, a solar power does not require control, and more democratic because it is resourceful. Therefore, the type of technology chosen by a society will affect the political aspect of the
However, he sees that “technology has political qualities, and embodies specific forms of technology” (p.19).He uses the two technologies that Lewis Mumford introduces, namely authoritarian, and democratic technology. Authoritarian technology is “system-centered, immensely powerful, but unstable” (Winner, 1989, p.19). Nuclear power is a good example of authoritarian technology because it requires a lot of control to avoid instability despite being powerful. In contrast, Democratic technology is “man-centered, week, but resourceful, and durable” (Winner, 1989, p.19). For example, a solar power does not require control, and more democratic because it is resourceful. Therefore, the type of technology chosen by a society will affect the political aspect of the