Examined Life is a collection of various forms arguments from numerous philosophers on a range of topics Cornel West on the nature of truth and the courage to examine oneself, Avital Ronell discuss the limits of meaning, Singer speaks on applied ethics and consumption, Kwame Anthony Appiah on cosmopolitanism, Martha Nussbaum on justice and disability, Michael Hardt on the meaning of revolution in the US, Žižek on ecology, human waste and artificiality, and Judith Butler and Sunaura Taylor on disability/impairment and the limits of individualism in America. In the first section of this paper I will attempt to classify each of these argument into the four type of arguments that Wilhoit’s presents in “A Briefs Guide to Writing Academic Argument” he explains four different types of academic arguments.
Proposal arguments in generally speaking has 2 parts: a problem and a solution section (Wilhoit, 2009, p.240) in examined life I find two instances of this type of argument, Ronell’s “Meaning”, Singers “Ethics” and Martha Nussbuam’S “Justice” , in the following paragraphs I will attempt to support this claims with reason from the text and movie of Examined Life.…