1. INTRODUCTION
The Office of the Higher Education Commission (OHEC) had implemented the “Thai-ASEAN Student Exchange Programme” from 2012-2014 to prepare Thai student to be ready for the establishment of ASEAN Community 2015.
Evaluation Purpose
The impact evaluation will be conducted to examine whether the Thai-ASEAN Student Exchange Programme’s outcomes have been achieved and to analyse the impacts of the programme on the students who were selected to participate in the programme as well as their home universities. The findings of the evaluation can be used to make a decision whether OHEC should implement this programme again or adopt it in other scholarship programmes.
Stakeholders
The stakeholders in this evaluation consist of the Office …show more content…
May need to know the impacts of the programme on Thai students and universities, especially the participating students and the universities
2. May need to know whether the programme’s outcomes have been achieved
3. May need to know the effectiveness of the programme’s implementation
4. May need to know the strength and weakness of the programme
5. May need to know whether the programme is cost-effective 1. Funding the evaluation
2. Developing the programme framework
3. Considering the evaluation methodology and data collection
4. Assisting to access the data resources
5.Considering the interpretation and analysis of the findings
6. Exploiting the findings
7. Assisting to disseminate the findings to other stakeholders Before starting the evaluation
1. Consulted about the evaluation planning and process as well as funding
During the evaluation
2. Asked for the assistance to access the data such as providing the related documents, issuing the cover letters to Thai universities to ask for their participation in the evaluation
3. Consulted about the interpretation and analysis of findings
After the evaluation
4. Reported the findings
5. Asked for the assistance to disseminate the findings to other …show more content…
Providing the related information or documents
3. Using the findings
Before the data collection process
1. Contacted to inform the evaluation’s objectives and to invite them to participate in the evaluation
During the data collection process
2. Asked to provide the information and opinions about the programme through survey and interview
3. Asked to provide the related documents
After the evaluation
4. Reported the findings
Thai participating students Secondary 1. May want to know how they develop themselves after participating the programme
2. May want to know the programme’s outcomes
3. May want to know the impacts of the programme on other participating students
4. May want to know the impact of the programme on Thai universities 1. Providing information and opinions about the programme
2. Providing the related information or documents
3. Using the findings Before the data collection process
1. Contacted to inform the evaluation’s objectives and to invite them to participate in the evaluation
During the data collection process
2. Asked to provide the information and opinions about the programme through survey and interview
3. Asked to provide the related documents
After the evaluation
4. Reported the
The Office of the Higher Education Commission (OHEC) had implemented the “Thai-ASEAN Student Exchange Programme” from 2012-2014 to prepare Thai student to be ready for the establishment of ASEAN Community 2015.
Evaluation Purpose
The impact evaluation will be conducted to examine whether the Thai-ASEAN Student Exchange Programme’s outcomes have been achieved and to analyse the impacts of the programme on the students who were selected to participate in the programme as well as their home universities. The findings of the evaluation can be used to make a decision whether OHEC should implement this programme again or adopt it in other scholarship programmes.
Stakeholders
The stakeholders in this evaluation consist of the Office …show more content…
May need to know the impacts of the programme on Thai students and universities, especially the participating students and the universities
2. May need to know whether the programme’s outcomes have been achieved
3. May need to know the effectiveness of the programme’s implementation
4. May need to know the strength and weakness of the programme
5. May need to know whether the programme is cost-effective 1. Funding the evaluation
2. Developing the programme framework
3. Considering the evaluation methodology and data collection
4. Assisting to access the data resources
5.Considering the interpretation and analysis of the findings
6. Exploiting the findings
7. Assisting to disseminate the findings to other stakeholders Before starting the evaluation
1. Consulted about the evaluation planning and process as well as funding
During the evaluation
2. Asked for the assistance to access the data such as providing the related documents, issuing the cover letters to Thai universities to ask for their participation in the evaluation
3. Consulted about the interpretation and analysis of findings
After the evaluation
4. Reported the findings
5. Asked for the assistance to disseminate the findings to other …show more content…
Providing the related information or documents
3. Using the findings
Before the data collection process
1. Contacted to inform the evaluation’s objectives and to invite them to participate in the evaluation
During the data collection process
2. Asked to provide the information and opinions about the programme through survey and interview
3. Asked to provide the related documents
After the evaluation
4. Reported the findings
Thai participating students Secondary 1. May want to know how they develop themselves after participating the programme
2. May want to know the programme’s outcomes
3. May want to know the impacts of the programme on other participating students
4. May want to know the impact of the programme on Thai universities 1. Providing information and opinions about the programme
2. Providing the related information or documents
3. Using the findings Before the data collection process
1. Contacted to inform the evaluation’s objectives and to invite them to participate in the evaluation
During the data collection process
2. Asked to provide the information and opinions about the programme through survey and interview
3. Asked to provide the related documents
After the evaluation
4. Reported the