The Ideal Muslin Kings Writing Style

In 1192 C.E, the Sultanate was initiate and conquered by Turkish Muslim Afghanistan riders. As the riders conquered the Delhi, they demolished local religious building and shrines. The riders did not always attack Hinduism and Buddhism, but the support they had for Islam helped them have a solid footing in northern India. In the excerpt “The ideal Muslin King”, the faith of Islam issued a guide for life that included the genuine behavior and treatment of the fellow Muslims. In the excerpt “the life of Charlemagne” gives a rendition of his character, appearance, studies, and his piety and his views on Christianity. In the postclassical ear, Christian and Muslim rulers have much similarity and difference in Political, social and religious duties. Such as giving back to the poor, and giving their judgment when need, Christian and Muslim rulers showed the act of discipline to their people. Though there are many similarities, there are some obligations that differ. To begin with, the similarity of religion duties with in both rulers was that they were very …show more content…
Both having the duty of punishing those who need to be or even when their judgment was need. The Muslim king, “Punishing the high ways used by Muslims free from the fear of highwaymen and thieves by exemplary and public punishment to make and example, as a warning to other.” The King punished those who stole and was in to thieving. The punishment was not only for disciplining but to make an examples of them so the other would not comment to same misdeed . The same goes for the Christian ruler, “but if the Count of the palace told him of any suit in which his judgment was necessary, he had the parties brought before him forth with, took cognizance of the case and gave his decision.” If his feedback was need from the Count he would give just as it would be a judgment seat. Also giving command that concerned to his