practically. Mills idea is important on the basis that human society always has the idea of thinking and
acting in a wrongful way and that society does not do things correctly. Therefore these actions that
society takes forms an open space in order for us to change or correct ourselves from our crime. This
open space will take shape as a discussion or debate, and these ideas that come through will shape our
society into a different direction. It comes to the conclusion that human society need this space
constantly because society does not get things rightfully done the first time. On the other hand, Devlin
claims that Mills is too idealistic. …show more content…
Society will create certain norms that are deemed acceptable or unacceptable, ultimately this is up to the society. Therefore since the harm principles promotes a truly individualistic
rights theory. The state cannot give the power to individuals to do what they please, that is not how
society will function, society will always come first. The state must worry not about the individual but
how their actions will affect the society as a whole. Therefore the state must protect society with their
justification through the norms of society. The community standards test allows for the state to decide if the action should be considered as
unlawful or wrongful. This test shows that it will judge the victims alleged crimes by people of the
society. This comes back to what Devlin was talking about; society will create norms that are deemed
acceptable and unacceptable. Now this test must be universal so that the context will not affect the
outcome of the conclusion. In the R. V. Butler case, the courts used the community standards test to
determine whether the movies Butler was distributing were deemed obscene. This leads to a problem
where this test must be applied all over Canada, but the store is only targeted to a certain