The Human Genome Project And The Human Genome Project

Improved Essays
The field of genetics is an interesting concept to comprehend because it beholds answers to why some people are born with genetic birth defects, such as: down syndrome, heart defects, neural tube defects and blood disorders (Miranda Hitti, 2006). Not only that, but it accounts for why millions of people die because of these defects and it is mainly due to the cause of having a genetic mix up (Miranda Hitti, 2006). This is where the human genome project comes to the rescue. The human genome project has a goal of achieving an "accurate sequence of the 3 billion DNA base pairs that make up the human genome and to find all of the estimated 20,000 to 25,000 human genes." (GHR, 2015). With this information, our medical technology can advance significantly …show more content…
It should not be a right that a person could progress with this idea because the lives of many rely on his hands. The human genome project in general should be made public, like what the National Human Genome Research Institute is trying to accomplish to prevent people and organizations such as the one in this situation from continuing.
However, this brings up the issue of who should be genetically tested and who will have entry to the subsequent data. Parents in presence of the birth of their newborn should be securely encouraged to have their child undergo genetic testing. The reason to this idea is that although both parents may appear healthy, babies should go through newborn screening because it is better to be safe than sorry when taking a glance at possible DNA errors. DNA errors arise from a common flaw from parent genes or a sudden fault that may have occurred in the replication of DNA when enduring the process of meiosis (Sarah Witherington, 2014). Either way, being able to predict these flaws can prevent death from over 30 genetic diseases that if not noticed early, will bring upon the inevitability of death. It isn 't just newborns who should undergo this genetic screening; everybody should go through this testing and this is
…show more content…
For instance, you cannot have a pilot, that according to their genetic make-up has a potential heart disease. This is a very dangerous and risky because at any moment the pilot can have a stroke and put the lives of passengers in danger. Although, this can be considered profiling and unfair, it is better to decline employment rather than put the lives of others in danger. Not only that, but a company can use genetic make-up to better improve the economy of their business. When taking a look at billionaire companies, they always look for a strong hard team to lead them to profit. Individuals with genetic makeups that propose they are intelligent and an extrovert will more likely be hired because they are what the company is looking for. On the other hand, those who do not qualify because of their genetic make-up suffer the lost because in reality, businesses do not take a look at your genetic make-up just because it is unique, but because it presents them with the characteristics you behold. If you lack any company requirements it is truly the individuals lost because all companies look for is people who can generate them profit. If you get the job, the company can also use the genetic make-up to offer health promotions and to take care of you. If you are obese, companies can recommend gyms, diets and

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Imagine this; a world where no one has lifelong infections or medical conditions. This might be made possible soon; however, some are afraid that parents will take it too far. With enough money, they could transform their babies to be intelligent and good looking. In my opinion, genetic engineering should be allowed, but restrictions should be in place to stop parents from making super babies. Genetic engineering is the purposeful changing of an organism's DNA.…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Altering natural-born feature with DNA is harmful, unethical, and detrimental to society because it is meddling with measures beyond our grasp. "The prospect of real designer babies—where it would be possible to reliably choose cosmetic traits such as complexion and hair color or even physical characteristics such as athleticism—remains a distant one. But that day may be drawing closer, thanks to advances in genetic technology.”(Naik) Genetic engineering is becoming a more popular topic every year, but doctors and gene specialist should spend more time looking for cures to diseases; rather than pleasing the hunger of ungrateful and unsatisfied parents. Playing God is a dangerous game that inevitably ends with a monster. If society eventually allows genetic…

    • 1252 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The NIPT should not be done on expecting mothers who are considered a high risk or already been tested for Down syndrome because it will present a false positive stating that the baby could have Down syndrome. According to Merryn Ekberg (2007) article, “the greatest benefits gained from prenatal genetic testing are the prevention of the birth of the child with chronic genetic disease and offering prospective parents a degree of liberation from reproductive risks.” (p. 67) The most important benefits of the prenatal genetic testing include: giving the mother the opportunity, or option to have an abortion, if there is any degree of being at risk in reproduction; it prevents the mother from giving birth to a child who is special needs and medically fragile; and it prevents emotional distress and financial struggle of giving birth to a child with genetic issues, or health conditions. It also gives the mother the opportunity to prepare or plan for the future of the child’s needs. There are several risks to having the prenatal genetic testing done which can include: the intervention of private lives, reproductive freedom loss, and discrimination of disability, sexual, racial conditions, and wrongful deaths. “With over 8000 single gene defects that affect at least 1% of the adult population, the demand for prenatal genetic testing is rapidly increasing.” (Ekberg, Merryn (2007), p. 68)…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to protect the majority of the people, health vaccine regulation may infringe on the individual and liberty. You will have individuals who would want to exercise their right to protect themselves including their children, that’s if they do not accept existing safety evidence. I see no argument in favor of religion exemption for vaccination when the public safety is at risk. Citizens have to realize that in a clinical trial, vaccines effectiveness has to be properly tested. Vaccines go through many years of research and testing and must pass safety and efficacy standard.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Gene Editing

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages

    We, as a society, should always be moving forward and bettering ourselves, but is genetic manipulation the best way to do it? Gene editing can help cure fatal diseases in children however it could be possible for parents to choose their children’s personality traits. Science should be used to better a person’s life, not determine it. It is not a moral obligation of a parent to screen out “personality flaws” but it is a parent’s moral obligation if they want to cure their child of sickle cell disease and save the child from a painful and possibly shortened life. It is wrong for parents and scientists to play God, except in the instance it could save the child from suffering.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One example may be down syndrome, which is a major cause for the use of genetic testing. While there are no cures, treatment may help it. This is a reason why either extreme is wrong: genetic testing should be allowed, but not to aid in the abortion of children. When given information on diseases such as down syndrome, parents should opt to get treatment necessary. This is extremely important because it is shown to help more than treatment provided after birth (Knapton).…

    • 1060 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In fact, they think it is a better option for children and their parents. They can choose an embryo that is not going to be affected by a certain gene and then their child will not have a specific disease, but that does not make up for the fact that one of the embryos just gets thrown away. Also when someone changes the genes to avoid a disease there is always a possibility that the gene pools gets messed up. Overall, there are more cons in the situation than pros and “designer babies” are not worth the risk. Some people are not able to have children for medical reasons so they have to look into In Vitro Fertilization for further help, but “designer babies” are going farther than that.…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    It is crucial to understand the way CSR works and how it is only an approach to make money. For years, the people have been deceived and they do not even realize that they are preyed upon by big corporations who are in the pursuit of profit. Consumers live in a capitalistic country where businesses dominate the economy and play the government like monopoly. People can no longer afford to ignore the real intentions that companies have because they are being unfairly taken advantage of and are only lead to believe that they are helping. Once people understand the importance of the scam that CSR is, companies can no longer harm the environment or the community.…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gene Therapy Cons

    • 2176 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Walters and Palmer believe that genetic treatment may be the only way to avoid many genetic disorders for some people. When an embryo undergoes germ-line therapy early enough, the embryo has a great potential to prevent irreparable damage to the developing embryo and thus be disease free. However, it then causes all cells of the embryo to be genetically modified. Germ-line therapy, as previously stated, prevents the transmission of genetic diseases through the generations, unlike somatic cell therapy. It is then more efficient to undergo germ-line therapy than somatic cell therapy.…

    • 2176 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I also changed my viewpoint because at first I thought there were no health risks involved with the HPV vaccine. However as stated above there are multiple ways in which the vaccine can have negative effects, because of this reason I can see why some people would rather take their chances, as well as the fact that the vaccine still needs testing and only time can tell whether it is full proof or not. In saying this I believe that if people/families decide they want to get immunised then I have the view that it should be done at a younger age. This is because it gives the bodies the best chance of creating antibodies as well as becoming more efficient if the real HPV came along and thus a greater chance of survival against the cancers HPV can cause. The earlier it is given also means that there is less risk of contracting the virus and spreading it amongst others because they are not yet sexually active at the ages of 9-12.…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays