They employed a very similar structure to their vodcast as we did to my vodcast. They started with synopsis of their texts, The Help and Jasper Jones. Then discussed their contexts, just as I did. They then began their deconstruction of scenes and analysis of issues. Their vodcast is well structured with a consistent discussion between Aaron and Harish. Compared to my vodcast the discussion is much better, they engage in discussing points far more frequently and more effectively then Tim and I did. There tone was similar to ours, they were clear and used terminology and jargon correctly.
However, when discussing scenes of the help they could've played the scenes over the top, like how we did. This would've allowed the viewer to see what they are discussing, which would've been better then them describing the scenes. Also it would've allowed for more time to analyse to scenes instead …show more content…
We both discussed the scene from the Help where Yil Mae is arrested. They discussed the body language of Hilly while I discussed the body language of Yil Mea and the police. The use of example to show racism was well thought out and considered aspect such as the "drive in cinema" which Tim and I did not discuss. We also both discussed the mistreatment of Jeffery by the cricket team and brought up very similar points, such as how the coach was cackling and how he is supposed to be a role model. But unlike Tim and I they then moved onto their next issue, while I discussed two examples of racism from each text. I'd recommend the use of more examples to show how wide spread the issue of racism is in both texts. However they second issue they discussed was a social hierarchy. They deconstructed a scene from the help where Hilly fires Abeline and discussed how Warwick Trent represents how corragin uses a social hierarchy. Again they could've used more evidence from both texts which would've reinforced their