Healthy Home Economist: Article Analysis

Improved Essays
Parents bear the responsibility of making life-shaping decisions in issues such as education and healthcare for their children. The growing skepticism against vaccines and the healthcare industry is worrying because it can potentially cause preventable deaths. In this paper, I will be responding to Sarah Pope’s entry in The Healthy Home Economist where she argued against vaccines. Pope established her family’s medical background to show that her claims are not unfounded. It is ironic that she used this to reel the reader to trust her because her background makes her a legitimate source of information, when in her previous paragraph she urged readers to realize that doctors can make mistakes and are blindly conveying information from the …show more content…
However she failed to consider the converse: there are no undos of not vaccinating children and them falling very sick to chronic diseases. Building up on Pope’s point on the fragility of babies’ immune systems, this presents itself as a strong reason to vaccinate. At such an early stage in life, babies have not developed strong immunities and are more vulnerable to diseases such as chickenpox and MMR. Haelle (2015) reported the lack of proof that spacing out vaccines is safer for babies. The recommended schedule was created with intentionality for the greatest protection from harmful diseases from well-researched sources such as the CDC (Haelle, 2015). The author continued defending her anti-vaccine stance based on her personal experience with vaccinated and unvaccinated …show more content…
Pope would increase her credibility as an author if she analyzed both sides of the debate which would transfer to the legitimacy of the arguments she makes.

#fallacy: A form of the red herring fallacy, Pope uses the appeal to authority argument. Just because the information she propagates comes from positions of authority in the medical realm, then her arguments are valid.

#emotion: It was not a far stretch to arrive at the anti-vaccine conclusion due to her personal experience. She could be biased towards anti-vaccine sentiments because she grew up surrounded by the sense of skepticism of vaccines and modern medicine to begin with.

#attentionalbias: Pope highlights this portion of her article by changing the font color. This indicates to the reader that this paragraph is important (Bodenhausen & Hugenberg, 2009).

#perceptualbias: Pope used a top-down approach because based on her belief of harmful additives in vaccines, she expected unvaccinated children to be just as healthy, if not healthier, than vaccinated children. This expectation hindered her from looking at the situation objectively (Bodenhausen & Hugenberg,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Vaccination: 18 Reasons to Just Say No is a pamphlet that vaguely resembles a health class discussion on drugs and how children should “just say no.” This pamphlet, although looks official, also gives skepticism to those who realize the benefits of vaccinations to children. The purpose of this pamphlet is to inform the audience, which in this case would be parents, to cease vaccinations and to encourage the natural route of immunizations. This pamphlet immediately spits different facts to the audience to convince them of the dangers of vaccines.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Andrea is aiming to persuade her audience into revoking mandatory flu vaccinations as a condition of employment for healthcare professionals. She believes that not only are the vaccines not as effective as the CDC presumes, but that forcing healthcare employees to get the flu shot is a direct violation of their human rights and it is unethical. She aims to prove the shots ineffectiveness and how accepting or denying the shot shouldn't dictate someone's career progression. Andrea does a good job addressing opposing view points.…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Such topics bring healthcare workers moral distress, as it is not easy to choose between the good of your patient and the greater good. Should the state get involved when it comes to the topic of vaccination or should this remain a decision of the parent? Can soon-to-be parents who do not plan on vaccinating their children be persuaded early on that a child needs to be vaccinated for their safety and the safety of others? How can healthcare workers find a balance between the patient’s autonomy and the greater good that comes with herd immunity? Those are all questions that the article poses and are a part of this very passionate…

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ver since the invention of the first smallpox vaccine more than two centuries ago, there has been plenty of controversy over the morality, ethics, effectiveness, and safety of vaccination and immunization When it comes to immunizing their children, an increasing numbers of parents aren't just relying on their practitioners advice — they're making their decisions based on rumors and advice spread online through websites, message boards, and blogs. Dinner parties or playdate conversations can be enough to instill doubts about vaccine safety or the necessity of giving multiple vaccines in one shot especially for new parents. Even when the science or sources behind anti-immunization stances are proved unreliable or even completely discredited, it can be difficult for some parents to accept that vaccines are safe. How does a medical journal compete with an A list celebrity stating that their child was diagnosed with Autism after receiving an injection.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Should children have to be vaccinated to attend school?” (Lemons, 2016, p. 185). This statement is the prescriptive issue that Jane Fullerton Lemons, writer for the 2008 CQ Researcher posits in her report on “Vaccine Controversies.” In order to get both sides of the issue, Lemons obtained a testimony from Amy Pisani, Executive Director of Every Child By Two, and a rebuttal from Barbra L. Fisher, President of National Vaccine Information Center. Initially, my thought was to side with Fisher, but with further reading I 've concluded that Pisani had the stronger argument, despite the weaknesses given throughout.…

    • 1845 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The anti-vaccine movement trend started after Andrew Wakefield published a non-fact based article in a medical journal, The Lancet (McCormick). Some parents are choosing to not vaccinate their children, not for religious or medical reasons, but for philosophical reasons. Philosophical reasons refer to personal beliefs that the vaccines…

    • 2680 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This essay will talk about the recent uprising against the MMR Vaccine, and subsequently vaccines in general, in the wake of Andrew Wakefield’s discredited report into a link between vaccines and autism (Wakefield et al. 1998, p. 1). After the report was released and spoken about on national television by Jenny McCarthy, a well-known American television host and model, it began to be swept up and has since been a common topic in American media and resulted in a sudden decrease in the number of vaccinated children (McIntyre 2008). However, despite the debates current resurgence in the media there have been no qualitative studies done into the reasons why parents feel uncomfortable vaccinating their children. Instead many of the attacks are directed at Jenny McCarthy and her personal ideologies and she has since been described as “The nation’s most prominent purveyor of anti-vaxxer ideology” (Grove,…

    • 2439 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The issue of immunizing children is a notorious concern for parents who worry that vaccinations like MMR (measles, mumps, and rubella) causes diseases like colitis or disorders like autism, yet vaccinations are deeply encouraged actions recommended by the Center for Disease Control (CDC) and many health care providers. The April 2015 Sacramento Bee article Parents opposed to vaccinations haven’t seen children ravaged by diseases by Georgia Bihr tells the audience in paragraph 10 to “…choose the option that best protects not only our own child but also everyone’s children from the greatest harm” (Bihr, 2015, p. 2); this supports the controversy that accepting vaccines will give the best protections for a child’s health. Although vaccinations…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The author, Lenny Bernstein, writes about how a mother of seven children was against vaccinating her children until all of them got the whooping cough disease. Bernstein currently writes for the Washington Post and typically covers medicine and health. He attended Trinity College where he studied American Studies, and he also graduated with a Bachelor’s degree from University of Michigan where he studied American Culture. In this post Bernstein seems like he is against the anti-vaccination community. In the post he writes “Vaccination rates in Canada, like those in United States, have waned in some communities, mostly as a result of increased skepticism about the dangers of immunization that have spread on the Internet despite overwhelming scientific evidence that vaccines are safe and effective.”…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When A Parent’s Business Becomes Everyone’s Business: Why Canada should Mandate a Vaccination Policy Vaccinations are one of history’s most cost efficient and effective medical achievements for preventing serious diseases. Over the course of 5 generations, vaccinations have prevented millions of deaths from diseases like polio, measles, mumps, whooping cough, diphtheria and rubella. These fatal viruses, which were once inescapable, have never been so easily preventable. However, this generation seems to have forgotten the horrors of these childhood diseases.…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    A mother’s love and protection for her child is like nothing else in this world and it is truly unique. It’s human instinct for a mother to have fears and be protective of her own. Some of these fears have led certain mothers today to believe that Immunizations are unnatural and not needed for their child. One mother, Author Eula Biss, wrote “On Immunity an Inoculation,” published by Graywolf Press in 2014, and she argues and defends the importance of vaccinations in our society today. This being despite suspicions she has with the healthcare policy.…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main focus of the article is to take the concerns of many parents about vaccinations, and to help them learn why these are false. By stating the worries, Haelle intends to make the readers feel a sense of fear and concern for what could happen to their children if they do not have them vaccinated. Parents want their children to be safe and happy, which is why this is beneficial.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    How does one change misperceptions? This issue regarding false beliefs is analyzed by Maria Konnikova in her essay “I Don’t Want to Be Right”. In her piece, Konnikova evaluates various previous studies regarding the effort to change beliefs ̶ particularly false beliefs. Taking an untraditional approach on a fairly traditional topic, Konnikova argues that self-image is directly related to open mindedness as opposed to traditional, advertisement-based studies.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Pros Of Mandatory Vaccination

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    The risks of not vaccinating are detrimental to the unvaccinated child, but also every other child around him or her. Worldwide outbreaks are not worth it (Jolley and Douglas 2) The world should strive to eradicate diseases such as measles, mumps, and polio. Parents who choose not to vaccinate their children are only exposing them and others to a dangerous world full of harmful disease. It is most important to make sure that children throughout the world can stay safe (Parkins…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many parents still hold to this notion, however, that vaccines are dangerous and pose serious safety concerns to their children. Adding to their worry, “…the medical community has notoriously overprescribed an enormous variety of drugs” (Loftus, 35). This does not garner a strong relationship of trust between the already anxious and wary parents with their medical providers. It is argued that “…parents have been persistently and insidiously misled by information in the press and on the Internet and because the health care system has not effectively communicated the counterarguments…” (Daley). Further, families that live…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics