They also say that secondhand smoke isn’t as harmful as studies have shown because the studies were ill based. Also that smoking has benefits like getting a worker through a long day of work or just smoking for enjoyment. All of these statements have faults though. The health hazards of smoking and secondhand smoke are plain and there. Doctor 's all over the world have validated that smoking is a health hazard. The studies that are “ill based” have been conducted by trustworthy health associates around the world. All of these studies have led to one answer, smoking is bad for people. Yes adults can make their own decisions but should they be able to decide if the public has to breathe in the nicotine filled air created by them smoking in public? It’s a violation of the rights of others that smokers smoke in public. Smokers can still smoke in their own homes and not endanger the health of others around them. In all cases the consequences outweigh the
They also say that secondhand smoke isn’t as harmful as studies have shown because the studies were ill based. Also that smoking has benefits like getting a worker through a long day of work or just smoking for enjoyment. All of these statements have faults though. The health hazards of smoking and secondhand smoke are plain and there. Doctor 's all over the world have validated that smoking is a health hazard. The studies that are “ill based” have been conducted by trustworthy health associates around the world. All of these studies have led to one answer, smoking is bad for people. Yes adults can make their own decisions but should they be able to decide if the public has to breathe in the nicotine filled air created by them smoking in public? It’s a violation of the rights of others that smokers smoke in public. Smokers can still smoke in their own homes and not endanger the health of others around them. In all cases the consequences outweigh the