The Rise Of The Han Empire By Shi Huangdi

Improved Essays
“ Neither the Han nor the Roman empire emerged through a sudden, unexpected revolution”. The Han empire was controlled by Shi Huangdi was a chinese monarch who was awed by his advisors by the scale of his success. while there was also the great empire of Rome that was controlled by Octavian who later went under the new name Augustus who like Shi Huangdi became a monarch both had multiple achievements while rule their empires and both used this titles and justified their actions because of their political power showing “How the builders of the Han and Roman empires conceived and justified their political authority
Starting with the Han empire source 1 of the packet titled “ From Sima Qian” which is a biography that describes Qin Shi Huangdi
…show more content…
As it start a quote that describes how he conceives and justifies his political authority is when the text says “ I raised an army by means of which I liberated the Republic, which was oppressed by the tyranny of a faction.” This example shows how he is justifying his political power by saying he liberated the republic to make it seems as he is freeing the people from their ways when a republic and accusing a republic as a bad thing to do that people must be freed from and he should be the only one in charge where as a republic where supreme power is controlled by the people. In addition another example in source 6 is when he says “ I waged many wars throughout the whole world by land and by sea, both civil and foreign and when victorious i spared all citizens who sought pardons” As seen in this example he tries to justify his political power by saying even though he started multiple wars he did a good thing by sparing them.. Source 7 is another list of accomplishments and how the Roman empire went from a republic to a monarchy because of Augustus and how he did great things for them and became the title of imperator. Sources 8, 9 and 10 are visual images showing Augustus in battle and his face on a Roman coin and statue for him these examples so how he felt conquering them helped better them and making his word law making him do what he wanted will better the roman empire. Source 11 describes how he was “Divine Augustus Caesar, son of god, imperator of land and sea the benefactor and saviour of the whole world” which is showing him as a great being who has a sacred power like the Mandate of Heaven because he was a son of a god. Which conceives and justifies his actions of conquering multiple

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Han Empire shared many characteristics with the Roman Empire like their government ideology, but also differed in areas including religious influence in the government and government systems and complexity. One of the bigger similarities that the Han Empire and the Roman Empire share are their government ideals. Both government systems are based upon expansionism and had a sense of strong nationalism. Through much expansion, both empires grow to become some of the most powerful nations in the ancient world. Both governments were extremely militaristic.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Han dynasty and Roman Empire were two extremely powerful and successful empires. Each had useful government systems that differed from each other. Roads were also a similarity between both the Han Dynasty and Roman Empire. Also, both The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire crashed and ended for similar reasons as well. The Han Dynasty and Roman Empire had differing government systems but were related in the fact that they each built and used road systems for trade, and their empires fell because they had the same problems.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Merry Wiesner’s article exploring the imperialistic ways of Ancient Rome and China during the Han Dynasty was quite eye-opening. Both kingdoms were located in very different parts of the world, but they had similar terrains, and obviously a similar way of thinking. They both understood that the people of their country needed to be governed, but monarchy was not the way to go about it. So, in turn, they decided to become an imperialistic society – rule with the use of an emperor. Wiesner poses the following questions in her piece: how did each of these peoples [Han and Rome] redefine political authority to suit a new level of world mastery, and what do their views of imperial authority tell us about the ways in which they understood the state and its power?…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty were among the most prosperous empires in world history, sharing alike qualities, positive and negative. Both had extraordinary developments and advances, but also sharing qualities that found themselves descending to a collapse. The Roman and Han empires thrived economically in trade. Less trade due to pirates along trade routes weakened the amount of taxes returning to the government. In addition to trade, raising taxes evenly weakened both empires.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jared Licht Period 5 Han vs Rome, Attitudes of Technology The Han and Romans were both huge forces in world history; technology and technological advances were both huge driving factors in the way their empires advanced. The Romans and Han had similar views on how important water technology was, and how it was vital to have a successful country, but the Romans certainly did not think the same way as the Han did about who the inventors should be, but they had similar opinions on how they glorified themselves as an empire. Water is a necessity and always has been, dating all the way back to the Han and Roman empire. Both the Romans and the Han knew that water technology is important to keeping a sustainable empire.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rise To Power Dbq

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Augustus' rise to power was a significant event that occurred towards the end of the republic. During his reign, he granted the peace of Rome that ended the 100 years of civil dispute, but it was at a certain price. Augustus' rise to power was a lamentable end to a virtuous republic because of his brutal ways towards treating his citizens and attaining his rank as well as changing the government by making his citizens obey him without question. In document one, it explains when Lucretia gets raped, that kings are not welcome in the government anymore and that they aren't loyal and they should not have them. Augustus was said to have a very difficult time during his rule, which is explained the document four.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Roman and Han Empire’s When we take a look back at all the great empires that ruled throughout history, seldom does someone go too long without making reference to either the Han Empire or the Roman Empire. Both of these empires shared a lot in common and both set a precedent for great leadership and imperial dominance throughout history. However, while these empires had a great deal of similarities, they were also separated by several outstanding differences. Although, with great distance in between the two Empire’s and the lack of communication to hear or learn about one another tactics, it is surprising to see how similar their methods became. Both Empire’s looked at land as a big dollar sign and a way to expand their Empire and strengthen…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout their time of rule both empires were imperial and under the rule of one ruler. The Romans had the Principate that called for one ruler controlling the government even though there was a senate. While the Han had rulers whom were deemed god because of what they had done for their people, and country, making both empires imperially centralized and without both aspects they probably would not have strived, and been as great as they are seen in…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Han Dynasty of China from 206 B.C.E-220 C.E. and the Imperial Roman Empire from 31 B.C.E-474 C.E., are two well known classical empires. They both contained many similarities and differences between their imperial administrations. In the Classical Period, the Han Dynasty & Imperial Rome both used their governments to establish a state religion and centralized bureaucracy. However, one major difference was that while the Han was a family dynasty, Rome was a republic. Under the rule of the Han family, and under the rule of Theodosius & Constantine, the Han and Rome established state religions.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    and 600 C.E. as a result of numerous internal and external conflicts. The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty internally ruptured due to political ineffectiveness as a result of corrupted emperors and officials and externally disintegrated because of nomadic invasions from Germanic tribes in Western Europe and the Xiongnu in Asia. However, the Roman Empire saw the decay of the faith of the Empire in the citizens as they turned to local landlords for protection, while the local landlords of the Han Dynasty began to defy the government and conquer surrounding territories and farmland. Rome and Han China politically decentralized because of debauched emperors and officials.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Due to Rome’s historical, deep-seated hatred of one-man rule, it was imperative that Augustus did not give the impression that he was establishing a monarchy. It is likely that Augustus would have learned from Julius Caesar’s mistakes– his adoptive father– and realized how dangerous it was to exhibit brazen displays of tyrannical authority. To prevent the Roman people from viewing him as a dictator, or even worse, a rex, Augustus capitalized on Republican terminology and rhetoric to counterbalance the astonishingly un-Republican nature of his regime. By describing the history of his leadership with traditional Republican idioms, Augustus was able to satisfy the people by assuring them of the continuity of a classic Republican framework, “even though important elements of this discourse had been rendered null and void by the time the Res Gestae was published” (Hodgson 263). In the sixth paragraph of the document Augustus claims, “The Senate and the Roman people agreed that I should be appointed sole guardian of laws and morals with supreme power, but I refused any office offered to me that was contrary to the customs of our ancestors” (Mellor 256).…

    • 1245 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Imagine your 18, one day someone tells you your closest relative, the leader of where you live has been murdered and you are his heir to throne. Once emperor you must go to war with other high officials and leaders of other countries to save your empire. This is exactly what happened to Augustus Caesar. Awhile after Augustus wins the battle for power and is the leader of Rome(soon to be an empire). In Augustus Caesar's reign he created the Roman empire and was its 1st emperor ,established a successful military to prevent further wars and attacks, and lastly expanded the Roman Empire and spread its culture and way of life.…

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Caesar was elected consul two years before he was legally allowed to he ratified Pompey’s oriental acts. The oriental acts essentially gave land to the urban, poor, and soldiers that did not have any. Crassus got allies that he had coveted to go along with all of his money.. Caesar received the political backing and connections he was looking for. A crucial goal of Caesar’s was to rise to power and aligning with Crassus and Pompey made the rise a lot easier.…

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two prosperous empires that exceeded in developing trade, creating new inventions, and leaving a legacy behind collapsed. How could such a prosperous empire fall? The western Roman empire and the Han dynasty both collapsed during the classical era for similar and contrasting reasons. The fall of both empires occurred due to internal pressures like epidemic diseases, economic and social issues while external problems like invasions and nomads taking place at the same time. After both empires collapsed, the regions faced change in their culture like the spread of Buddhism and Christianity and adaptation to the previous empires customs.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although Han China and Gupta India were politically stable, Han China’s developing bureaucracy was centralized, while Gupta India was much more regionalized. Han China and Gupta India both featured extensive internal trade; however Gupta India was more involved with trade. Both empires had many intellectual achievements but Han China had much more innovative achievements, as in improving things, while Gupta India was much more dynamic, meaning the Indians worked on theories and then proved them. Something the Gupta Empire and the Han Empire had in common was that the emperors of these empires both believed they were chosen from the gods to rule.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays