The Gun Control Debate

Good Essays
The gun control debate has started to raise a lot of attention in the past couple of months among American citizens. The debate is over whether or not there should be stricter laws preventing people to own guns. There should be tougher laws because there is not any structure with gun control. There have been multiple shootings in the news involving guns, and people want answers. The laws that have been created in the past and present, people being injured or even killed, and the president not having any response on the debate are some the issues that need answering. Although gun advocates feel their rights as citizens of the United States will be tampered if the government changes gun laws against them, new gun laws will stop gun violence and …show more content…
Kennedy and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in 1968. It was called the Gun Control Act of 1968. In 1994, Congress passed bills to restrict certain assault weapons and created a national system of background checks for gun purchase. According to “Gun Control” (New York Times), after the bills were passed, the political pendulum began to swing the other way. There are thirty percent of people that feel gun laws should be the same and twelve percent that feel they should be less strict, according to Brian Montopoli, writer for Cbsnews.com. There have been bills set up to change the atmosphere and have more control today but have not been passed yet. New legislation will put more control on guns that is needed among the citizens. Montopli says forty-seven percent of people believe gun laws should be stricter. Gun advocates believe the new legislation will separate them from their rights because putting laws on their firearms will be against Amendment II. The Senate turned aside the latest attempt by gun advocates to expand the rights of gun owners to carry concealed weapons in other states, according to the article “Gun Control” (New Times). But there have been laws signed in their favor. Obama signed a law allowing visitors to national parks and refuges to carry loaded and concealed weapons. Obama should not have signed the law provision because that could be a …show more content…
New laws are needed because there is an increase in gun violence in the United States. The NRA does have a reason to oppose by saying their rights under the Second Amendment will be stripped from them, but there should be an exception when citizens take advantage of freedom. The shooting in Arizona has raised concern and now citizens of the United States are waiting for answers. Montopli (CBS) says there are more people that want stricter laws while gun advocates think there is nothing wrong with the laws. Gun advocates say guns are for protection, but they are not thinking about the mentally challenged people that should not have them. The government needs to think about this issue and pass major legislation to toughen the

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In the past few decades, firearms have had a big impact on society. These impacts have been both good and evil, and have caused controversy on the topic of gun ownership. Some groups, such as the Brady Campaign, would like to see gun control laws take away some rights and restrict others, whereas the National Rifle Association would like to protect gun rights and educate society on the use of firearms. Both sides want to stop the problem of gun violence, but protecting gun rights is the only way to truly insure public safety. Gun control will not be able to stop the use of guns, and it will put citizens in an unfair situation where they cannot protect themselves.…

    • 1808 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Gun Control Argument Essay

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Gun control has become a very big problem with people in the United States, with all the reasoning on why the government are putting tighter laws on guns. Some people have made poor choices with guns and it has made the government start to think on how they can make it to where there is more control over guns without having to take guns away completely. Even though some people believe that guns should go away completely and some believe that there should be no gun control whatsoever. The second amendment keeps the government from taking away guns completely because people have the right to bear arms. There are many arguments against gun control because people believe they shouldn’t be punished because of choices other people are making with…

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Gun Control In Mexico

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The organization actively fights legislature that would enact gun control laws. Gun control laws are used to protect people and not to infringe on their rights. The way the National Rifle Association fights legislator seems like they want anyone and everyone to have a gun. The NRA is right when stating that guns are a constitutional right, but they are wrong in saying who should get them. Giving someone a gun that was deemed mentally unstable should not be given a gun.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Gun control supporters are lobbying for a mandatory waiting period for purchases of handguns. The states seek to reduce violence, murders, and crimes with the new gun laws. Advocates of gun control want restrictions on sales of all guns, but citizen groups and arms manufactures are trying to prevent this from happening. Polls from the states show public support for having background checks, banning larger round magazines and sale of assault weapons, and stricter gun trafficking laws. However, government should not limit private ownership of firearms due to statistics…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Why Guns Are Bad

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout history, the citizens of the U.S have used firearms to defend themselves. Also, the second amendment gives them the right to carry guns, and it is because they believe that guns control law is not working. Did you ever think of how you would defend yourself if our country was invaded in a war ? the only protection we will have is our military. They can not fight for this country forever.Therefor the arms embargo laws simply reduce the possibility of self-defends laws.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the article against banning guns, by Shiha Dalmia, I believe they make a valid argument. It is unrealistic to believe that the government would be able to take all guns away, even if they put regulations on them. People have many ways to get their hands on guns, even if they have to do it illegally. The article states,” There is no easy way to get Americans to voluntarily surrender their guns. Asking them nicely won’t do the trick.” This implies that people feel personally attached to their guns and that they aren’t going to just turn them in.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The United States is not.” (End the Gun Epidemic in America). The argument they had used to retaliate at those facts were weak. By saying, “... at least those countries are trying,” means they’re not really trying hard enough. E specially if killers are getting their hands on guns. Having gun control in those countries and people are still getting guns makes you want to fear for your life.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Therefore, gun control would be going against this statement because Obama is breaking the law by trying to remove guns away from people. Gun-control has its perks, such as keeping guns away from mental health patients and keeping track of guns that are stolen. However, it is going against what the constitution says. Taking away guns violates every person’s right as a U.S. citizen because the Fourteenth amendment clearly mentions, “No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States” (Fourteenth amendment, 1992, para 1). Therefore, the United States cannot enforce gun control because it will cut the privileges of citizens.…

    • 1380 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Don T Kill People Do

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages

    First of all guns don’t kill but the people are the ones who cause the things to happen. If guns were prohibited to certain type of people then many people wouldn’t care and try to obtain a gun or weapon. Even though, there is people that should not be able to obtain weapons for the fact that they don’t know how to use it. President Obama is trying to pass a gun law control before the end of his presidency. Before Obama Finishes his term he wants to make a change and try to make a difference in violence, but Obama doesn’t Realize that if he passes a stricter gun control law it is not going to make much of a difference, with Mass shooting that will continually keep happening.…

    • 912 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Devotees of the ordinance also argue that without federal laws, declares with some firearms limitation will provide guns illegally to states with stiffer restrictions. Opponents of federal involvement advance Second Amendment arguments against any gun control. They also argue that national gun laws only cause extra burdens for law-abiding citizens when to seek to buy and sell…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays