Meletus Arguments Against Socrates In Plato's Apology

Superior Essays
In this paper I will discuss the charges Meletus brings against Socrates in Plato’s Apology and the arguments that Socrates provides in his defense. Then, I will evaluate these arguments by considering what they establish, how they work, and, ultimately, whether or not they succeed in showing that Socrates is not guilty of Meletus’ charges.
Meletus brings two charges against Socrates: (1) “Socrates is guilty of corrupting the young,” and (2) “of not acknowledging the gods the city acknowledges, but new daimonic activities instead” (Ap. 24b). Socrates does not believe he is guilty of either charge and he provides two arguments against the first charge and one against the second.
His first argument against charge (1) begins with a reiteration of the charge that Socrates slowly draws out of Meletus: “all the
…show more content…
His argument operates under an assumption that bad people harm the people closest to them and good people benefit the people closest to them. Hence, it is better to live among good people and it is harmful to live among wicked ones. Additionally, Socrates engages another assumption in his argument: “no one wishes to be harmed,” or in other words, no one intentionally causes themselves harm (Ap. 25c-d). Therefore, no one intentionally corrupts people around them because they will be creating sources of evil close to them, thus inflicting self-harm. It naturally follows, given that Socrates could only corrupt the youth deliberately or unintentionally, that he could not do so deliberately because he would be inflicting self-harm. Therefore, either he is not guilty of charge (1), or he corrupts them unintentionally, and if so, Socrates says, “the law doesn’t require that I be brought to court for such mistakes” (Ap.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The purpose of this paper is to critically evaluate how Socrates replied to the main charge he was…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lastly, some of Socrates’ premises within his argument will be discussed on their controversial nature. The first premise: Socrates does not believe in any gods, corresponds to Meletus’ original claim of atheism and corruption of the youth. He asks clarification on what Meletus’ indictment that Socrates is teaching the young “not to…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arguments Against Socrates

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He believes that for the accusation that meletus has made you don’t take a matter for trial but you advice that person that what he is doing is wrong you don’t just go to courts because when the matter has reached court that means you want punishment. This matter is not subjected to punishment it can be resolved peacefully without anyone facing facing punishment or jail. If Socrates was corrupting the youth, the youth and their parents should have noticed and reported the matter. If this case was reported by the parents of thr youth that was taught by Socrates it would be strong bt then because it was reported by meletus it is weak.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Socrates did not corrupt the youth. This answer is not, however, one-dimensional. Because this question is at the center of discussion within a trial setting, there is a legal dimension to this question that must be addressed. But looking at this question solely though the lens of legality does not provide us a robust answer – we must also address the question with the broader idea of corruption in mind. At no point in this five-word question does it tell us to only interpret the question in legal terms.…

    • 1513 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Set during the socratic age of philosophy, The Apology by Plato chronicles the trial of Socrates on the charges of corruption of youth and not believing in the Gods. Plato, a young follower and apprentice of Socrates, documents the trial in its’ entirety from beginning to the unfortunate end in which Socrates is sentenced to death. The Apology is the trial of Socrates on a very basic and literal level but upon further inspection, one comes to realize that not only the philosopher is on trial but philosophy itself. Throughout the piece, Socrates attempts to convince the jury of philosophy’s worth and also criticize the condition of man. Furthermore, the recounting of the trial is also a protest of the hypocrisy within the Greek society that…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The three main charges against him is his religious beliefs, corrupting the young and also his views of the Athenians. Even though there were several prosecutors and evidence to prove Socrates guilty, he guarded his ground and remained true to his philosophies. He proved many of his beliefs with evidence that will be discussed throughout this essay. However, it made the process much longer than expected for the people of Athens. Socrates religious views were seen as unusual to the city.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    After Socrates gives the court some historical background as to why these rumors exist, he focuses his attention on Meletus and the first charge. Socrates begins by stating that, since Meletus claims to know who is corrupting the youth, he must know who improves them. After some back and forth between the two men, Socrates gets Meletus to say that all Athenians improve the youth and that Socrates is the only one who corrupts the youth. Socrates continues to use Meletus own…

    • 2276 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates continues to explain how he can’t violate the verdict, which in this case is the death penalty therefore, it would be wrong because Socrates couldn’t go against his principles. Socrates states, “ Come then, if we destroy that which becomes better by the healthful and is corrupted by the distasteful, because we don’t obey the opinion of the experts, is life worth living for us when it has been corrupted? Surely this is the body, isn’t it?”(47e) Socrates is explaining how in his mind life is not worth living unless it is lived appropriately in this case being, that the ethical life is more important than life itself. Socrates continues his justification on why he can’t escape prison because by committing this action he would be doing what he considers as the unjust thing because he would’ve been seen as a dishonorable…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justice to the Jury In the Apology, Plato characterizes Socrates to be wise and concerning for men’s souls. Throughout the defense Socrates claims that the jurors can kill him, but they cannot harm him. He believes that if they jurors convict him, they would be harming themselves because they are tainting their souls by ignoring the truth. Socrates’ arguments for these claims are cogent because Socrates centers his arguments on the fact that truth and justice is not truly defined and that man must constantly reflect upon his thoughts to clearly define these qualities.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Socrates is a philosopher known for his teachings in Athens. He taught his entire life, where no one would bother him. Socrates was accused of corrupting the youth and inventing new gods at the age of seventy. For varies reasons which will be discussed later, the city of Athens chose to wait till this age to prosecute and execute him. Socrates chose to accept his fate instead of escaping to avoid execution.…

    • 1322 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    And from his brilliant debates accustomed with truthfulness and honesty that all stemmed from an oracle in Delphi, he laid bare the false wisdom of politicians, craftsmen and poets. It is from this very course charges against Socrates followed as explained in the following sections of this essay. In addition, I will address any objection…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    We argued that that the imprisonment of an innocent man has already undermined the Laws of Athens and so his escape would be just, in reversing the damage to the state. However, Socrates believes that one should ever wrong someone else, and he believes that his escape would undermine the Laws of Athens, and so under this justification, Socrates is justified in not escaping. We considered the idea that perhaps for Socrates his not escaping is not about political obligation but is instead a matter of maintaining his character, and if this is his true justification then he is justified in his…

    • 1501 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates defends himself against those charges brought against him Toward as much prosecutor Meletus in two ways. Restricted comprises of a portrayal about Socrates’ inspiration Also method, which he trusts will demonstrate of the jury the reason exactly people, including as much prosecutors, detest him. Those second resistance comprises of socrates reacting straightforwardly to the two charges brought…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates starts to give his defense about Meletus’ first accusation. The first accusation is that Socrates was corrupting youth (Plato, Apology, p.234). Socrates responds to this accusation by asking Meletus questions. First Socrates asks Meletus again that did he corrupt the youth. Meletus agrees with that statement.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Indeed Meletus has proven that he is guilty of everything he accused Socrates of. First, Meletus himself corrupts the mind of the youth by contradicting his charges against Socrates. Second,…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays