Who is the artist, and what is the artist’s …show more content…
people who are looking for the cartoons about the Great moral excuses through the ages could be deemed a secondary onlooker. Generally, everyone who sees the cartoon and analyzes it would be somehow part of the audience.
What are the artist’s value? What does the artist assume about the audience’s value?
Paul has created amazingly value of the cartoon since it concentrates on one young black boy waiting for someone to be his slave and take him away from the stage with those cuffs that goes from his neck to his legs as he is prisoner. The people comments at the boy were extremely crucial and against humanity in which makes the boy as he is nothing to human and he should know that he does not deserve to live in his own freedom. The cartoon shows that people in that time didn’t have any moral or heart to put this poor kid in stage to sell him in order to his skin color. The author totally defends human rights: Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, color. Therefore, the art has had extensive idea of making people look to other people who are from different ethnicity as a basic human that have the same rights. Paul gives a great visualizing image about the issue of taking black people as salve in the 16th century was wrong and people did not have the right to make other people slave while treating them as they are non- human. moreover, the artist assumes that everyone include the audience allowances the same values and gives mandatory in life. The author uses a technique that makes everyone is in the same path in sharing the