The studies shown by STAR (2011) and SREE (2013) clearly show that the outcomes have a positive effect on student test scores. The data shows that reduced class sizes work. The benefits far exceed the costs. Thus showing that these funds are used effectively. This, essentially, will be cost effective in the long run because reducing classes now because it is proven to and the schools can continuously us this and trade-off will seem to be higher, but in reality will actually will be superior. To produce greater outcomes in modern schools, most programs are driven by quantity over quality. Such as placing more students into one classroom. It saves millions by reducing teacher revenue. If the school districts want something that in the long run they can lower costs they need to examine the missing economic cost: what these children are actually receiving from these classes. With reduced classes they are then able to have a personal relationship with their teacher and can converse effectively of what they do not
The studies shown by STAR (2011) and SREE (2013) clearly show that the outcomes have a positive effect on student test scores. The data shows that reduced class sizes work. The benefits far exceed the costs. Thus showing that these funds are used effectively. This, essentially, will be cost effective in the long run because reducing classes now because it is proven to and the schools can continuously us this and trade-off will seem to be higher, but in reality will actually will be superior. To produce greater outcomes in modern schools, most programs are driven by quantity over quality. Such as placing more students into one classroom. It saves millions by reducing teacher revenue. If the school districts want something that in the long run they can lower costs they need to examine the missing economic cost: what these children are actually receiving from these classes. With reduced classes they are then able to have a personal relationship with their teacher and can converse effectively of what they do not