The Great Debate
“NCAA is similar to a shareholder distribution plan. This “sharing of the wealth” is driven by television contracts with the organization for post-season football bowl championships.” [source needed here otherwise = plagiarism] Being an athlete in college is a semester-long commitment. College athletes dedicate 40-60 hours per week to their sport, which makes it impossible for them to get a job with medical benefits. College athletes should be paid to play sports because this will create a fair and equal relationship between player and university. The first reason college athletes should be paid to play sports in college is because if they are not financially compensated, they are in a vulnerable and disadvantageous position. …show more content…
Students don’t see any of that money made from ticket sales, advertising, likeness or name being used. A standard amount should be paid to all athletes no matter the sport, school, or sex. Athletes can be paid with tickets sold at games, their names and photos being used while in college. Colleges and companies make money all the time from athletes. The opposition fails to understand that everyone is making money off of the athlete’s and they are not seeing a dime of the money. “NCAA rules prevent student-athletes from receiving money, transportation, or any extra benefit or expense allowance not authorized by the NCAA legislation. This includes benefits from an agent or any agreement to have an agent market the player’s athletic ability or reputation in that sport.” [source citation] College athletes had title taken away for taking anything from anyone. However, people of the opposing viewpoint argue student athletes receive scholarships, which can value anywhere from $100,000 to $200,000 for four years and is more than enough money to take care of them until they are out of school. “Mark Murphy, Director of Athletics at Northwestern University, who participated in an ESPN [sports television network] debate on the topic of paying student-athletes, argues that all student-athletes have made similar commitments to the schools and that football and
“NCAA is similar to a shareholder distribution plan. This “sharing of the wealth” is driven by television contracts with the organization for post-season football bowl championships.” [source needed here otherwise = plagiarism] Being an athlete in college is a semester-long commitment. College athletes dedicate 40-60 hours per week to their sport, which makes it impossible for them to get a job with medical benefits. College athletes should be paid to play sports because this will create a fair and equal relationship between player and university. The first reason college athletes should be paid to play sports in college is because if they are not financially compensated, they are in a vulnerable and disadvantageous position. …show more content…
Students don’t see any of that money made from ticket sales, advertising, likeness or name being used. A standard amount should be paid to all athletes no matter the sport, school, or sex. Athletes can be paid with tickets sold at games, their names and photos being used while in college. Colleges and companies make money all the time from athletes. The opposition fails to understand that everyone is making money off of the athlete’s and they are not seeing a dime of the money. “NCAA rules prevent student-athletes from receiving money, transportation, or any extra benefit or expense allowance not authorized by the NCAA legislation. This includes benefits from an agent or any agreement to have an agent market the player’s athletic ability or reputation in that sport.” [source citation] College athletes had title taken away for taking anything from anyone. However, people of the opposing viewpoint argue student athletes receive scholarships, which can value anywhere from $100,000 to $200,000 for four years and is more than enough money to take care of them until they are out of school. “Mark Murphy, Director of Athletics at Northwestern University, who participated in an ESPN [sports television network] debate on the topic of paying student-athletes, argues that all student-athletes have made similar commitments to the schools and that football and