Free Speech: The Dangers Of Space And Freedom Of Speech

Improved Essays
The Dangers of Safe Spaces Safe spaces can destroy the basic setup of college campuses right to promote freedom of speech. Freedom of speech is something that many have fought long and hard for everyone to have. College is supposed to help everyone get accustom to how things are in the real world. Having “safe spaces” on campuses deliberately hinders freedom of speech and it helps generate a world of more close minded people. While colleges are comprised of people from all around the world, everyone’s mind is not that diverse when it comes to thinking. With that being said, not everyone has the same viewpoint. Freedom of speech gives you the right to voice your opinion on any topic. But, that should go for everyone. When Dr. Martin Luther King Jr gave his, “I have a dream” speech, plenty of people were against it. They didn’t want to hear it, but, they couldn’t stop him from voicing it. In an article featured in the Washington Post, “Don 't ask us for trigger warnings or safe spaces” there was an excerpt from the dean from the University of Chicago. One of the main purposes of college is to learn from other. In the article the dean states, “"You will find that we expect members of our community to be engaged in …show more content…
Just because someone’s view is different from yours, doesn’t make them wrong or their intentions hurtful. In “Problematic: The Battle for Free Speech” Peter Wright, he has the same view on “safe spaces”. Wright states that safe spaces” creates an atmosphere that conflicts with the intent of higher education (which is the furthering of participant’s education and strengthening critical thinking) and the rules of the College as a whole.” One of the main purposes of college is to force you to have conversations about opposing viewpoints. In every class in college, there are open discussions. No student should be allowed to leave because they are upset over someone else’s

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Should schools be allowed to limit students online speech? I think schools should be allowed because some student may try and take the internet to their advantage. So, what i mean by that is that student will post things on their social media and think nobody can do anything about it. Students will post things on social media about another person behind their back and before they know it they are getting bullied or being laughed at. Students or teachers can be victims of cyberbullying.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are two essay saying whether colleges should allow safe space in college. In essay 1 is allowing safe space in college and essay 2 is against safe space in colleges. In Gay’s essay she says that safe space are good because people can have freedom of speech and they can talk about anything. The students wanted the safe space as a sanctuary. Gay says that a safe space can allow people to feel welcome.…

    • 394 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Freedom of speech has been an integral part of American society ever since the founding fathers gathered in Philadelphia to create the nation’s fundamental laws. The first amendment of the Constitution guarantees every American citizen the right to freedom of speech. In recent years, questions have arisen about whether free speech should be regulated, specifically on college campuses. Are college students too sensitive to handle issues brought up in free debate? Two articles that address this issue are “Millennials Will Soon Define ‘America,’ and That’s a Problem for Ideas” by Julie Lythcott-Haims and “Today’s Students Have a New Way of Looking at Free Speech” by Kathleen McCartney.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the two stories, “The seduction of Safety, on Campus and beyond” by Roxane Gay and “Silly student Protesters Have It Wrong: “Safe Space” are Incompatible with a University” by Charles C.W. Cooke are both different in values and priorities. In Gay’s articles she believes that there is a chance for people to have “safe space” where they are able to be better in their own way. In Cooke article he think the opposite that there should be no change that they need to maintain focused on the real problem that are there classes. In the article “The seduction of safety, on campus and beyond” by Roxane Gay many of the values and priorities where different because the writer had different points of view in which she stated, “Those who take safety for granted disparage safety because it is, like so many other rights, one that has always been inalienable to them.”…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to Haidt and Lukianoff, “The ultimate aim, it seems, is to turn campuses into ‘safe spaces’ where young adults are shielded from words and ideas that make some uncomfortable” (Haidt and Lukianoff 44). To the students, the goal is to create restrictions on the academic discussions about uncomfortable topics by implanting trigger warnings. To them, trigger warnings will help them feel more comfortable in collage by knowing what material to expect as they can plan to skip the lesson. While trigger warnings makes them feel more secure, it destroys the purpose of universities. Universities help strengthen students’ academic minds and to prepare them for the real world.…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    citizen’s right to free speech. If trigger warnings were established to help students feel secure, then why does it repress the teaching abilities of college professors? The idea that in an educational setting, we as students as well as the teachers cannot express our feelings is preposterous. Now there are moments when people will try to take advantage of free speech and deliberately hurt others through words, but not all words should be censored. Students take small comments to be offensive, yet they may make a comment about someone else with ease; Mike Bloomberg provides an excellent example of why our freedom of speech should be justified without any restrictions as he says “What I do may offend you.…

    • 1752 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Trigger Warning

    • 1715 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In Jonathan Haidt and Greg Lukianoff’s article The Coddling of the Mind he expresses how trigger warnings might even be viewed as “vindictive protectiveness” as “It is creating a culture in which everyone must think twice before speaking up, lest they face charges of insensitivity, aggression, or worse” (Haidt, Lukianoff). This kind of protectiveness does not benefit a student in any way, mainly because it prevents them from engaging in intellectual discussions with people and ideas that they might not always agree with; a bad aspect if you want to succeed professionally in your career. This article also adds a common saying in education circles, “Don’t teach students what to think; teach them how to think” (Haidt, Lukianoff). By protecting students from course material that is needed in order to prepare them for professional life, a professor is teaching them what to think. By keeping course material with explicit content so that students can actually engage in collegiate discussions with people and ideas without causing a few of their peers…

    • 1715 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Colleges campuses, once a beacon for progressive reforms, stimulating discussions, and engaging debates, recently have been scrubbed clean of language that may be perceived as offensive or hurtful to minority students through the use of speech codes. Speech codes seek to protect the mental health of college students, and punish harassment that occurs on campus, however because of their ambiguous wording, they have been stretched to censor unpopular opinions and important discussions. By protecting students from all words or displays that may cause offense, colleges are not adequately preparing students for life in the working world, and inadvertently presenting students with a sheltered and unchallenged world view. In an attempt to create “safe…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I agree with Caleb Yong article on how free speech is important because he explained how lead each person to form the own ideas and opinion and individualize themselves, and although it can lead to hate speeches there is also speeches that benefit for the better. It’s important for people to speak your opinion and ideas without having to have restriction on how important the matter is to you. Every speech has its negative and positive points but it usually the benefits out weigh the negative factor of the speech. I do think that is very important to keep in mind that every action has its…

    • 1030 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If there is one thing I have learned from my time as an undergraduate so far, it is that free speech is no longer about sharing ideas or holding conversations, but rather shouting down one’s opposing side. Disagreement is a natural human behavior, but when expressions become heated and motivated by one’s personal beliefs, they also become unproductive. Universities should be places where ideas are discovered and discussed, not where haphazard claims and quick anger should dominate campus dialogues. It is a lesson all young political leaders should take to hear before their political opinions get the best of…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is important to focus on all three of these factors in order to determine whether free speech is a good thing rather than make judgements about speech only based off the consequences. Citizens have the right to speak freely about anything especially the things that are not common belief. However, anyone who is around the speech has a right to disagree and comment back. Nevertheless, this does not mean that all speech is appropriate or pleasing to all receivers. Many…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Freedom of speech is a privilege all Americans share. A person can state whatever they please, so long as it doesn’t cause a clear and present danger, without government interference. The idea that someone can legally think, be, and say whatever they want is what lead millions of immigrants to form the U.S. back in 1776 and is the same reason people fight for their right to live here today. Thanks to information being so accessible in this digital age, individuals are told that they are allowed and to study and form an educated opinion. This comes with one catch.…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    College is supposed to teach students freely and discuss material that open ups the mind without limitation. According to college professor Lisa Hjjar, “Any kind of trigger policy is inimical to academic freedom” (Medina). An example of this would be if an English professor wants to read the book “The Adventures Huckleberry Finn”. This book has many trigger warning on it because of the numerous racial slurs. But, the book also has a moral teaching behind it that is expressed throughout the book as well.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Cyberbullying Dbq

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mini-Q Essay Outline Guide Working Title: Paragraph #1 (Introductory Paragraph) Grabber: Schools are a safe place for students, so why change that with cyberbullying? Background: Being cyberbullyed is a terrible experience. With the anonymity of the internet, a student could be cyberbullyed without being able to address it.…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Freedom of speech can be debated on whether or not there should be boundaries to it or not and on what is considered freedom of speech. The First Amendment affirmed that "Congress shall make no law...abridging freedom of speech" but based on www.legal-dictionary.the free dictionary.com it states' All speech is not equal under the First Amendment. The high court has identified five areas of expression that the government may legitimately restrict under certain circumstances. These areas are speech that incites illegal activity and subversive speech, fighting words, obscenity and pornography, commercial speech, and symbolic expression'. On this information and amongst other I believe that freedom of speech is both restricted to a fault and abused.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays