The Great Debate Of The Nba Essay

1652 Words Oct 6th, 2016 7 Pages
The great debate of the NBA in the 1960s centered around two men who revolutionized the game of basketball in their own contrasting and unique ways. Bill Russell was a quiet warrior with unparalleled intensity. His primary concern was whether or not his team won. Everything else was secondary. Wilt Chamberlain was a once-in-a-generation athlete with an ability to seemingly score at will. His talent resulted in statistics and records that are unimaginable by today’s standards. Naturally, the question arises between Russell and Chamberlain. Who’s the greatest? The fascination in the debate lies in the contrasts between the two men. They both reached heights that no current player has a chance to match and yet their accomplishments stand in stark contrast to one another. As time passes, the debate is evolving. Opinions based on eyewitness experience have been replaced by a strange combination of raw data and legend. As the debate evolves so do opinions, and the general consensus seems to be that Chamberlain records are greater than Russell’s championships. As we take a closer look at the two men at the center of this debate, we’ll come to find that Wilt’s statistics mean much less than we think, and in comparison to Chamberlain, Russell’s greatness shines much brighter than we could have ever imagined.
Legendary Celtics coach Red Auerbach once defined the appeal to the Chamberlain argument perfectly. “Chamberlain,” he said “was the most unbelievable physical specimen ever.…

Related Documents