There are severals reasons for the identification of crime decline, which starts from the period of the beginning of 1990s and lasted until its end. Most important is to understand the cause and consequences related to the mystery which conducted to this decline.
Like stated Zimring, (2007) “crime dropped all over the US- in every region in the country as well as the city, in poor neighbourhood as well as the rich neighbourhood.”
Another reason, may be the legitimacy of the information or its source, being not exact, not definitive, which even sometimes are considered to be false.
The reasons for those affirmations are multiple. Principally, linked to the methods of data gathering, the participants who submit the data, and contribute to the process.As, during …show more content…
Like for ex: in order to not give an impression to be overwhelmed with crime, and having a decent presentation face to the other data agencies. _ This may lead to a very confusing situation.
The other than that, some agencies might have not enough data, ou do not have at all, data for a particular type of crime. Which may be a problem in case of data comparison at a national level for example. So, some agencies may go forward to the resolution of this problem by the “data adjustment”, adding or subtracting a part of data. This may be a natural process, because anyhow the final destination , UCR may never find out the real data.
The agencies may go more far and even shade the part of the data, while intentionally submitting just a part of it.
Or, intentionally not collecting the full set of the
Like stated Zimring, (2007) “crime dropped all over the US- in every region in the country as well as the city, in poor neighbourhood as well as the rich neighbourhood.”
Another reason, may be the legitimacy of the information or its source, being not exact, not definitive, which even sometimes are considered to be false.
The reasons for those affirmations are multiple. Principally, linked to the methods of data gathering, the participants who submit the data, and contribute to the process.As, during …show more content…
Like for ex: in order to not give an impression to be overwhelmed with crime, and having a decent presentation face to the other data agencies. _ This may lead to a very confusing situation.
The other than that, some agencies might have not enough data, ou do not have at all, data for a particular type of crime. Which may be a problem in case of data comparison at a national level for example. So, some agencies may go forward to the resolution of this problem by the “data adjustment”, adding or subtracting a part of data. This may be a natural process, because anyhow the final destination , UCR may never find out the real data.
The agencies may go more far and even shade the part of the data, while intentionally submitting just a part of it.
Or, intentionally not collecting the full set of the