Constitutional Compromises

Improved Essays
Even though the United States struggles with the idea of democracy when they were deciding whether to make a new constitution, the United States soon learned how to become more supportive of the democratic system when creating constitution itself. This is proven when look at the Great Compromise because the representatives in the conference because it is giving the state and government power, not just one power. The Separation of Powers also supports the idea of a democratic system because having the 3 branches helps prevent from any group from having too much power.
The struggle of democracy when representatives were deciding whether to make a new constitution in the year 1787. This was shown in the calling of the convention when the people
…show more content…
The great compromise shows proof of this. The great compromise happened in the composition of convention when the representatives were trying to think of a good government system. The first idea that came up was the Virginia Plan where there would be vote by population but some representatives felt that this would progress them nowhere as it was the same as Articles of Confederation. The representatives didn’t want the power to be completely by the state because that was the articles of confederation but didn’t want to do it just by the population. The representatives ended up compromising and picking a government system that votes by the state AND population. This is a symbol of democracy because the representatives came together to agree on combining both of these ideas as a majority, rather than one central power picking only the Virgina Plan or visa versa. The great compromise was the first step towards democracy. If one central power picked only the virgina plan, it would 've causes most representatives and citizen to be stuck in the same position with the article of confederation, where they ended up unhappy with the government situation. If this did happen, it might have resulted in another constitution being written which there would be no promises the following one would be great either. When aiming to be democratic, the most important thing is to be willing to compromise and find a middle ground. If this cannot be done, it will be hard to ever come to an agreement or to ever not be ruled by one central

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In The Philadelphia Story: The Founding Fathers and the Myth of Constitutional Intent, Jack Rakove tries to show us that the Convention did what they believed was best even though not everyone might see it. All men at the Convention arrived with different ideas and expectations but had to be reasonable and put the nation first. James Madison wanted the Virginia Plan to be passed because it meant that representation was based on population. However, the small states did not agree and presented the New Jersey plan which consisted of equal representation. To appease both the large and the small states the Great Compromise was created.…

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    J.S. Mill like other political thinkers before him had various issues with government that was ran through a democracy. Overall, I would not say that J.S. Mill is not undemocratic, he instead just fears what majorities would do if they had access to that much power because much of what Mill believes is centered on the personal development of the individual. One of other main concerns with democracy is that with rule by a majority you will in turn sometimes suppress a minority.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It gave them a chance to start a new form of government without a king. The only problem was Hamilton and Jefferson did not have the same idea of the type of government they wanted to accomplish for their new nation. Hamilton wanted to accomplish a strong central government. He wanted a government that would be able to control the people’s behavior. He understood that “sometimes good people do bad things and bad people do good things”, this gave Hamilton an advantage because Jefferson did not recognize this.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Extended Republic

    • 1812 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The election of these representatives would take place in their own districts, and they would be held responsible for properly conveying the concerns of their constituents to the larger body. Though this seems fair and equal, there was the fear that the citizens would not really know their leaders well enough. In such a large nation, there would be very few people who were recognized by the entire nation, and the Anti-Federalists were afraid that it would be these same people who ended up getting elected each time to lead the people. This would create a “natural aristocracy” where those elected would be truly unlike those who were voting for them (Storing 17). While it is true that the first few leaders tended to be those who were prominent for their role in shaping the country, it was a largely unfounded fear.…

    • 1812 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Evi Vayts Constitution Closing Speech 1. Franklin thought it was important to support the Constitution so that the people around and the future generations would feel as one united nation that can keep going. 2. I think it would fall apart quickly because there wouldn’t be one higher law that everyone would need to follow, there would just be small groups that would always fight and never accomplish anything. Summary: Benjamin Franklin didn’t fully agree to the Constitution, but he believed that one day it would be possible to believe in what it says.…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How would you feel if your vote in deciding the next president of our country didn’t matter? Well, this is true for many people due to our broken Electoral College system of voting. I strongly feel that we should get rid of it for many reasons. My first reason is that it doesn’t give equal representation to certain states. My second reason is that it doesn’t match up with the popular votes that were taken by the people.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Citizens make up the state, so if you do not have citizens you would not have states. Then if we were to get rid of the Electoral College; then the candidates would pay attention to other states more than they do now. They are more worried about the winner take all system that they ignore the state they already know their vote for them. Which disenfranchises voter who supported the losing candidates. This system favors some citizens over others, which denies some people their choice of president.…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One other concern they had when establishing the executive branch was giving the president too much power. They feared the possibility of absolute power in the executive branch such as during the reign of King George the Third occurring again. That is why they put into place both limitations on the executive branch and an Electoral College system, which would make it so that a small elite group of the population would have the overall say in who becomes elected the next president. Therefore, if the Electoral College would be eliminated, the founders would probably not react too well. All the effort that they went to in order to make sure that the president would not be elected based off of just popular votes would have gone to waste.…

    • 1995 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Congress decided their current form of government, the Articles of Confederation, had many flaws. It was too weak to stop things such as Shay’s Rebellion. Because of this they organized a convention, many state representatives showed up, but some did not because they were pleased with how it was and didn’t want to change this. The people who were against changing the Articles of Confederation are called Anti-Federalists, and people that were for this are called Federalists. As a Federalist I believe the people of the United States should ratify the Constitution because we would fall to pieces without it.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Each of the founders proposed a different issue with the Constitution, but overall the main concern was among them involved the fear of too much power. The United States Constitution gives power most of the power to the people because it is based off of a democratic outline of government, but still requires a leader. At this time, James Madison and Alexander Hamilton argued democracy was the best governmental system outline to follow because they believed that advocating for the majority should be a higher priority . They wholeheartedly supported the ideas of the people and wanted to let everyone have a say. Some of the men in the Ant-Federalist Party disagreed with the idea of democracy because they favored they favored the idea of rule of the few elite.…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays