They view the Bible as a human product that was administered by the Holy Spirit. Because of that, it prevented the work from having error and each word was intentionally chosen while keeping the writer’s style. The association of the Holy Spirit gave God’s message to the authors without corruption to share with all who read. Since the Bible is infallible, Evangelicals claim the Bible has the ability to correct all other authority. Evangelicals argue against the liberal view that our experience could correct the Bible. Liberals say we must approach the Bible with a more progressive understanding because it has unjust notions toward specific groups of people, whereas Evangelicals use the Bible as an ally to teach what justice looks like. God and His will are revealed in His Word, so it has extreme significance. The infallibility of the Word of God is vital to evangelicalism. One can only know about God as much as He wills, and so the statements about God that God made in His Word are the only things we can absolutely be sure …show more content…
He attests the Bible is accurate in the revelation of Christ to the early Church and mirrors the revelation of God in Christ. Moreover, Grenz and Olsen fleetingly touch on evangelicalism once again in the conclusion of their book after revisiting the liberal theologians of the 20th century. They contend that the 20th century did not bring any consensus to the issues of God’s transcendence and immanence. In fact, they argue that it did the antithesis and exacerbated “the tension between immanence and transcendence (Grenz & Olson, 1992, pg. 311). On the other hand, they do argue good has come the theologians of the 20th century for they have laid the foundation for the innovations for the theologians of the 21st century to derive