In the gospel of mark, the narration mentions that there were bystanders provoking Jesus to drink the sour wine while mocking him. Notice, the narrator does not specify who the bystanders were. Nowhere in the text, does Mark give reference to the Jews being the antagonist during the event. This can be interpreted that Mark’s main focus wasn’t to put blame on the Jews, rather put the attention around Jesus death. Moreover, it was already known to who the bystanders were. “It is clear enough that Jesus …show more content…
As Jesus is crying and shouting, why has God forsaken him, the reader is left to infer that Jesus felt as if God had abandoned him. But, it simply could have been the pain that Jesus endured that triggered such a response. Since, Jesus knew beforehand the kind of torture he was going to encounter. Nevertheless, Mark prepares the reader to presume that Jesus felt as if he failed to influence the non-believers. Then he leads the event how a roman soldier realized that Jesus was the true messiah, which could be depicted as the beginning of christianity as we know it. Hence, Jesus had successfully serve God’s plan. “Mark’s ‘way to the cross’ is transformed from weakness and suffering into triumph and glory. The slain Lamb is not a picture of suffering. The Lamb has triumphed through death, and exercises power, authority, and judgement; crucifixion, resurrection, glorification, judgement, and final victory are collapsed into a single martyrological event. (Clark,