The Good King: Is King Arthur Good Leader?

Decent Essays
King Arthur good leader?

Is King Arthur a good king? King Arthur and His Knights of the Round Table. King Arthur is a good king because he doesn't rank his knights by wealth, he also treats everyone equal, he is also chivalrous.

King Arthur Knights of the round table are not ranked by wealth. This is so the least wealth ones are not left out. That is why he created the round table so everyone has an equal spot at the table. No one is at the head of the table no one is in the middle of the table.

Sit down all of you, for at the round table no man may complain that he is set at the lowest end, or that another is place above him… But of the high honour of the Table you shall hear before long.(p. 48)

King Arthur is a good leader because

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Arthur had to step up because he knew that they needed a king and he felt that he could do and be the best that he…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Did Sir lancelot's deserve to be on of the knights of the round table? The answer is yes he did. He was a gentleman and never only served the high but even the lowly. Lancelot was the son of King Ban of Benwick (benoic) and Queen Elaine. He was baptized as Galahad, but sooner changed to lancelot.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Step 1 This investigation attempts to answer ‘How effective was Charlemagne as a leader?’ The question is relevant and important because it’s important in understanding French and European history. The issues that will be addressed is basic background of him as a leader, his religious impacts, his political structure, his battles, and how he expanded his empire. This investigation will focus on Charlemagne’s rule from 768–814 CE and the places focused on in this investigation is the Kingdom of the Franks during Charlemagne’s rule.…

    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arthur’s allusion represents the overall battle of good versus evil and the fight for equality. King Arthur and Arthur Jarvis were well liked, and respected by the people. Paton states “the church had been too small for all who wanted to come” (181), and this is the ultimate representation of the respect that Arthur receives. King Arthur had the Knights of the Round Table at which everyone at the table was seen as equal. Arthur Jarvis fights for the equality of both races and his death is seen as a major tragedy.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Andrew Jackson was a man who did a lot of good things for his society. Although, many people felt that Jackson was a man not worthy of being called a king. Though there were some things that Jackson did that may not have been considered very good, the good parts of what he did outweigh the bad. After much research, Andrew Jackson should definitely have been considered a king of his time, because of his many great accomplishments. Jackson would not let any other states nullify the laws or judge them.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A true knight of the round table was defined by his honor and his ability to be a noble warrior. To be commended in such high prestige, one had to abide by a strict code of ethics. This code of chivalry included perseverance, courage, humility, respect, courtesy, and loyalty. Men who could openly live by these virtues were worthy enough to be held in high esteem by the medieval society. In Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, a newly appointed knight of King Arthur’s court aspires to follow the code and thus reach the pinnacle of his knighthood glory.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 771 it is stated that Charlemagne’s brother became ill and passed away, and Charlemagne was “unanimously elected,” (p.27) which says to me that he had found favor among those who had elected him. I believe that he was a good leader at the time of his existence, considering times were much different. He was relentless and pushed tirelessly forward until he was satisfied; such as the battle he fought with King Desiderius in which Charlemagne “exhausted the King, and forced him to surrender at discretion.” (p29) Einhard also states that King Charlemagne “wreaked vengeance” (p.31) against the Saxons in return for their “faithless behavior.” (p.31) Let me explain why I believe this is a good trait, then.…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Was Beowulf A Good Leader

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Even though he put his needs and values before others, Beowulf was a good king and leader because he was well respected among people and protected them from danger. Beowulf contained almost every attribute that makes one a good leader but such attributes also lead to the downfall of Beowulf his death. I believed Beowulf was a good leader and king amongst the people of Herot. Throughout the land Beowulf was a well respcted man and made sure people lived without fear. “ He kept our coffers and our kingdom safe.…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    King Arthur's Heroic Hero

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I think Arthur is heroic not only because he is brave and courageous but also because he strives to live up to the code of honor he sets for his knights. He really tries to follow his code even when it is not of benefit to him. For example, he give Mordred a place at court because his code of honor requires him to do so even when he know that Mordred is dangerous. He does not want to acknowledge Launcelot and Guenever because it would break the code by bringing a lady to dishonor and would not be in the best interest of the kingdom. Even after he is at war with Launcelot, he is willing to meet with him honorably.…

    • 256 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the medieval times there was social classes. There was three main social classes which were: nobility, middle class, and low class. You couldn’t change your social class in these times, you was born into your rank. In “A Knight’s Tale” it shows the the social ranks and it also showed things that you wasn’t allowed to do or say.…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The topic of Bonaparte being either a good leader or a poor leader is a common debate among historians. Although all these debates, Bonaparte was a good leader. He executed many well thought plans to benefit the country he loved. First, Bonaparte had many military successes. At only the age of twenty-five he became a brigade general.…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Life was a struggle in Europe at this time. The Byzantine Empire suffered from numerous invasions and warfare from the Northern Vikings. Charlemagne brings the end of this feud. He encourages the people to convert to Christianity which is part of the reason why the church was such an important part of everyone's lives. He also sets up schools and libraries were scholars copied down ancient texts.…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The code of chivalry emphasized bravery, military skill, generosity in victory, piety, and courtesy to women”(Hirsch). The story of King Arthur and his Knights of the Round Table is surrounded by hundreds of different tales telling of the various attributes of a number of different Knights, including the King himself. One element that is present in every tale told of these knights is chivalry. King Arthur demanded of his knights that they follow the code of chivalry while on their adventures. His Knights of the Round Table did so proudly as they served their king, their country, and also women.…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chivalry was the moral code that the noblemen of the middle ages strived to follow. This code outlined how a knight should behave in battle and to a greater extent how they should act at home. Gawain and the Green Knight and Marie De France’s Lanval can both be read as explorations of chivalry. Both works present chivalry as an impossible ideal rather than a fact of medieval life. Lanval, Gawain, and Arthur’s court are all pillars of the chivalric ideal, in Marie De France’s Lanval Arthur’s court is said to have, “had no equal in all the world”(154) and in Sir Gawain and the Green Knight Arthur’s court is said to consist of, “the most courteous and chivalrous knights known to christendom;”().…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the times of the Middle Ages, there was a very prominent social structure set into place. The Middle Ages had people such as; Kings, Lords, Nobles, Knights and, Peasants. During this time period, there was a Feudal system in place. This system meant that if someone like a peasant worked for a lord or the King, they would be rewarded with land. This system kept everyone satisfied.…

    • 1653 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays