The Generality Of Reason In Nagel's Argument

Improved Essays
The second argument Nagel gives to prove objectivity is reason. To reason is to think systematically in ways anyone looking over someones shoulder ought to be able to recognize as correct. It is this generality that relativists and subjectivists deny.4 The essential characteristic of reasoning is its generality.5 The generality of reasons mean that they apply not only in identical circumstances but also in relevantly similar circumstances-and that what counts as a relevant similarity or difference can be explained by reasons of the same generality. Ideally, the aim is to arrive at the principle that are universal and exceptionalness.6 Reason is used to deflect argument, or to belittle the pretensions of the arguments of others. Claims that …show more content…
“The serious attempt to identify what is subjective and particular, or relative and communal, in one’s outlook leads inevitably to the objective and universal. That is so whether the object of our scrutiny is ethics, or science, or even logic.”10 This is because, “The concept of subjectivity always demands an objective framework, within which the subjective is located and his special perspective or set of responses described. We cannot leave the standpoint of justification completely, and it drives us to seek objective grounds.11 In summary, Nagel is trying to say because man has the ability to reason; he can then think objectively, “We discover objective reason by discovering that we run up against certain limits when we inquire whether our beliefs, values, and so forth are subjective, culturally relative, or otherwise essentially

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    All these questions are questions asked in philosophy and deal with different views and approaches philosophers take to answer these practically impossible questions. Nagel in his book titled “What Does it all Mean?” tries to give certain viewpoints in how these questions may be answered, leaving them all open to interpretation. I will give my viewpoints on these philosophical questions, presenting my understanding and views…

    • 2266 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The strength of the argument is in understanding the…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The cosmological argument takes the presence of the universe to involve the presence of a being that made it. It is an argument that begins from the presence of the universe, and from endeavors to demonstrate the presence of God. This argument draws on involvement from the material world. It is crucial to know that the most this contention can plan to demonstrate is that there exists a vital being who caused everything in the universe. Nagel’s summary of this argument is as follows:…

    • 1807 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Edward Lengel's Analysis

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages

    America’s victory over the British can be argued that it occurred for many reasons, some reasons more straightforward in explanation while other reasons are more complex and highly controversial. Of the numerous arguments for America’s success over the British, foreign intervention, especially by the French, is indisputably the most significant contribution America’s victory. The alliance that America shared with one of Britain’s most threatening opposing forces at the time placed the rebels at an advantage. However, the dispute and constant search for Loyalist support is an important reason, arguably more important than foreign intervention, why American succeeded in the Revolutionary War. Stephen Conway, who is a professor and writer from…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Regarding the relationship between the body and the mind, people cannot avoid two important philosophy concepts:, Physicalism, and Functionalism. Physicalism believes that the only substance exist is physical. Functionalism suggests that mental states are the internal cause of behavior.(Braddon-Mitchell&jackson p41). In this paper, I will mainly discuss four perspectives about Physicalism, Functionalism and the argument “ What is it like to be”. First, what’s Physicalism?…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    An integral part of philosophy, and the philosophy of mind, is the study of epistemology. Each of the philosophers studied this term have varying approaches of the study of knowledge. Tyler Burge is no different in this circumstance. In Reason and the First Person, Burge does not clearly state what his idea of knowledge is, nor does he provide much of his opinions on the importance of knowledge. A large part of Burge’s ideas of epistemology are shaped by the philosophy of the mind, and the idea that knowledge develops concepts of knowledge of the first person, and reasoning.…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compare and contrast Camus’s, Nagel’s, and the existentialist’s (as set out by Sartre and De Beauvoir) positions on the meaning and value of human life. Which is the best supported position (be sure to give reasons for your judgment), and what problems does it still face? How might it respond to these problems? In this essay I will compare and contrast Camus’s, Nagel’s, and the existentialists’, specifically Sartre and De Beauvoir, positions on the meaning and value of human life.…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that Nagel 's primary conclusion in “What is it like to be a bat?” is that while there are multiple different forms of consciousness, humans cannot be sure of the presence of consciousness in lesser forms of animals, such as a bat. The “what it is like” for Nagel is reworded as being subjective character. The bat has subjective character, which is experience. Even though we know that bats hang upside down, have webbed arms and feet, and use echolocation, we will never truly know what it is like to be a bat. While we can all have thoughts on what it is like to be a bat, Nagel states that because everything has its own interpretation of itself, there is no way we can add specific information into our minds to actually see what it is…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In Sexual Perversion, Thomas Nagel deals with what is considered “normal” and “abnormal” sexual behavior. Nagel introduces three circumstances which can be accepted without any exact analysis. Any sexual desires which are unnatural will be considered sexual perversion. Fetishes of objects is seen as perverse, but regular sex is not. Lastly abnormal sexual proclivities are perverse compared to abnormal practices adopted not from proclivity but for other reasons.…

    • 173 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    I premise that human beings are born morally neutral. Firstly, I support my argument using Aristotle’s view. Like Aristotle, I premise that human beings by nature desire to know because they were born with an empty mind. As a result, they are in pursuit of knowledge to get the sense of bad and good so that they can distinguish the moral deeds from the immoral acts. Secondly, I support my argument using Locke’s view.…

    • 1533 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If there was one article that really stuck out to me throughout the semester, it has to be Nagel’s “What Is It Like to Be a Bat”. It’s concept and philosophy fixed itself into me and I tried applying those ideas to other articles as we went on. This article addresses one of the big questions of consciousness that tends to float around when discussing philosophy, which is what is it like to be something other than yourself? It isn’t too often that you debate on whether or not something or someone is experiencing the same feelings obtained through the environment as you are.…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Grendel, by John Gardner, Grendel demonstrates a dynamic change in character throughout the story which allows the reader to experience his thought process and why he choose to commit a variety of crimes. At first, the reader see a side of Grendel that is not present in Beowulf. This side of Grendel displays his intelligent and wise thought process on certain matter. Grendel shows his solipsism in these beginning chapters through his actions and words. He believes that he is the only creature who can make rational decisions depending on different circumstances.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thomas Nagel is an American philosopher who is currently a philosophy professor at New York University. In his essay, published in 1976, Nagel indicates that the problem of moral luck arises from a clash between our application and intuition most people share about morality. He states the intuition as, “Prior to reflection it is intuitively plausible that people cannot be morally assessed for what is not their fault, or for what is due to factors beyond their control” (Nagel 138). Nagel then goes on to give a definition of moral luck. He says, “Where a significant aspect of what someone does depends on factors beyond his control, yet we continue to treat him in that respect as an object of moral judgment, it can be called moral luck” (Statman 59).…

    • 1558 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It has asked questions, in which Hegel was able to answer. It has discussed that I found Hegel more compelling; not only due to religious biases, but his catch-all ideology seems to make clarity of the blur that is questions in which these two have inflicted upon reading their work. Despite the fact that I believe Hegel more, however, it does not stop me from questioning his beliefs. There is so much to explore and ask than one philosopher can answer. After all, a fool can ask more question than 5 learned men can…

    • 1886 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes and Hegel are both important models in the world of philosophy; particularly they play key roles in trying to make sense of a philosophical God, and his role in our lives. Descartes reasoned that since he does not freely create what is in his consciousness, something else outside of his consciousness and, thus, greater than him must also exist. On the contrary, Hegel’s central philosophy rested on the idea that people have purpose because they have stories. In addition, Hegel believes God’s purpose is shown through history. Notably, each of these philosophers had revolutionary ideas on the reason God exists.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays