Summary Of On The Genealogy Of Morality By Nietzche

Improved Essays
In his collection of essays On the Genealogy of Morality, Nietzsche distinguishes between the moral systems of good/bad and good/evil and describes their origins, as well as problems that arise with the origins of good/evil in order to analyze two different moral systems and their implications. Nietzsche first distinguishes between the two moral systems of good/bad and good/evil in order to draw a contrast. Good/bad is defined as those with power and those without power: the good, like the warrior caste, have the power while the bad, like the poor, do not have the power. This is a binary way of viewing morality where good is the exact opposite of bad. The binary of good/bad does not implicate anyone for their status but is instead based in …show more content…
First, it neglects to acknowledge the outliers of the binary, in that there can be good that is associated with the masters and bad that is associated with the slave. The last three issues arise when Nietzsche provides the examples of the lambs and the birds of prey. In this story, the lambs are good, the slaves, and the birds of prey are evil, the masters. Nietzsche makes three claims within this story: it is only the fault of language that we separate the bird of prey from its natural action and because of this failing the lambs fault the birds of prey for killing them, despite it being the bird's natural instinct. Additionally, the binary of good/evil is born of resentment and that can implicate others that are not evil. Nietzsche claims that through language we dissociate actions from subjects, thus making the action appear as an afterthought. Nietzsche describes this as “taking the latter for an action… separates strength from expression of strength.” The consequence of attaching “bad” actions to people, or similar people, has allowed the idea of good to be born of resentment. This cloud one's judgement on the true definition of good and evil, as association becomes one’s only basis for good/bad. Nietzsche most directly describes the failure of moral judgements. If someone only has one reference point for what is good and one reference point for what is bad, there is a whole spectrum in the middle that can be lost or miscterogorized. Often humans develop ideas of what is good and bad, and if something does not fit their definition of good it is automatically bad, and vice versa. This can cause failings in moral judgements as humans are unable to collectively identify one person as evil. The dissociation of actions from subjects too affects the slaves as it blames the slaves for their weakness, rather than acknowledging weakness as their natural

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In Nietzsche’s approach, he attempts to back up his claims by accusing other philosophers of not being able to think critically. He does not believe that the good man is the opposite of the evil man like previous philosophers believed. Nietzsche accuses past philosophers of establishing their beliefs based on the good man being opposite of the evil man. In Nietzsche’s Beyond Good and Evil, it is discussed that people are treated differently. He uses a larger scale to show the materialistic ethics in which the more powerful individuals in society can mistreat those that are more vulnerable.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Slaves were thought of as mere animals, without traits to make them human, and accordingly, slaveholders did not see their mistreatment as fundamentally wrong. Dehumanization was the ultimate factor that allowed slaveholders to act without morality. If they saw the slave as an…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The brutal way that slaveholders abused their slaves was dehumanizing and evil. Slaves were given out of line disciplines and they figured out how to utilize different people groups botches as cases. Families were moved to inverse sides of the nation given no contact. Ultimately they were dealt with more awful than creatures and plainy slighted. The Inhumanity of Slaveholders is a prominent theme in Douglass’ and Jacobs’ texts.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He looks at empirical causes to explain the existence of morality in order to reason why it is the way it is. When analyzing his work, would seem like Nietzsche has a hollow concept of justice. What only every seems to be just is what the current laws that exists advocate for. There does not seems to be anything more or anything less to the statement. There is nothing grandeur to justice because the meaning can change just as easily as…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is no distinct difference between being considered good and being considered evil. Every person falls somewhere in between the spectrum. An evil person would be considered someone who is immoral. An evil person puts his or her life above everyone else’s, and will stop at nothing to get what he or she wants.…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Corruption and irresponsible power enjoyed by the slave owners over the slaves pose adverse impacts on their own moral health. In this regard, slavery is depicted as being unnatural to all the players. For instance, slave owners experience temptation to commit adultery and raping their female slaves thus fathering…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    What does it mean to be evil? Some people may define it as physically or mentally harming others for selfish reasons. Or other argue it means to hurt the ones you care about most. Moreover, both definitions are expressed in William Shakespeare 's Macbeth and William Golding 's Lord of the Flies. The audience recognizes the characters immediately react immorally and not respectably given different situations; proving naturally, people do evil and not good.…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The United States of America was founded upon religious toleration, which was brought over by the Puritan society. Between the Puritan time period and the Fuller and Wayland period, there have been three forms of slaves used within the United States. The first form of slavery was the indigent servants system, people; mostly men would come over to America and work for seven years in exchange for several acres of land in which to live off of. The problem with this form of slavery was that most of the indigent servants never lived for the full seven years they needed to work. The settlers of early America then decided that Native Americans would be good way to solve the void of slaves in society after the indigent servant system failed.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Where the beginning of Morality came from has been a huge debate among people for hundreds of years now. Morality can also be called the goodness in people or the desire to be good. Theists believe morality comes from God. Atheists believe that morality comes from our own conscience or reason. In this essay we are going to focus on proving that morality could not have come from God in view of the following reasons, 1: You can be good without God, 2: The Bible is not a clear guide for direction on morality, 3: There are many things that religious people do not agree with, and 4: The problem of evil.…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Slave ownership can turn a kind person into an evil and self-consumed person because absolute power corrupts people. When a kind person buys a slave, they treat them nice in the beginning, but over time they begin to abuse the slave either because they develop a craving for absolute power or people around them convince them that a slave will revolt if not treated in a strict manner. Fredrick Douglass tells his readers that Mrs. Auld treated him kindly, and even began to teach him to read, which would later prove to be a mistake, but after her husband warned her of the dangers of a literate slave she became cold-hearted. This is an example of someone that was convinced by others to treat slaves like property, not as a human. Mr. Auld turned out to be right when he warned Mrs. Auld of the danger of a literate slave because Douglass then began to pursue literacy with a passion, which eventually leads to Douglass deciding to flee to the North.…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In chapter 4 of James Rachels and Stuart Rachels book, The Elements of Moral Philosophy, the authors examine the philosophical question whether morality depends on religion. They noted that in popular thinking, morality and religion are inseparable and that people generally accept that morality can be understood only in the framework of religion. On the other hand, from the perspective of the atheist or non religious people, the world is full of evil and in total chaos. Furthermore, the concept behind an all loving God and the ultimate rule maker of the moral code depicts the theory of Divine Command. The Divine Command Theory postulates that the question of what is morally right is commanded by God, and morally wrong is forbidden by God and draws a conclusion that the objectivity problem in ethics seems to be solved.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nietzsche And Nihilism

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He prefers to focus on the intention of the action rather than looking at the action itself making this is a common misconception of morality. “The origin of an action was interpreted in the most definite sense of origin in an intention; one came to agree that the value of an action lat in the value of an intention” (BGE 32). Nietzsche tries to articulate the Christian saying “know thyself” has now transformed into a moral value. By embedding the idea of ‘free will’ into the psyche of its followers, Christianity has made a dishonest sense of responsibility and has completely overlooked the deterministic factors in the world. He recognizes these ideas in the same passage, showing that he understands the concept of human internationality.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Title and number of the article. Reading 19: How moral are you? Who did the original study? Lawrence Kohlberg did the original study in 1927-1987…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history, the human race has struggled with whether it is essentially good or inherently evil. Even the greatest minds have had difficulty finding a definitive answer to this perplexing conundrum. Saint Augustine of Hippo, Hobbes, and Nietzsche all pondered this and were unable to come up with a simple answer. Fortunately, the debate that has lasted for millennia is coming to a halt. However, in order to successfully analyze the ways of humankind, a clear framework must be established.…

    • 1655 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Question 1: Where do our morals come from? Morals are not as instinctive as heartbeats. A sense of right or wrong is teachable, but not as permanent as bones and blood. People are not born with morals instilled in them.…

    • 1195 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays