Ten Amendments

Superior Essays
On September 17th of 1787, a group of men to whom we call “The Founding Fathers,” wrote one of the most famous documents; The United States Constitution. The goal when writing the constitution was to help better American lives by creating a set of Ten Amendments that grant basic rights to all citizens. The Founding Fathers essentially took pieces out of other famous documents like those of The Magna Carta (1215), The English Bill of Rights (1689), and The Virginia Statute of Religious Freedom (1786) to help conserve rights to everyone (Hardy 8). As time went on, it became clear that the amendments originally written were not clear and the interpretation needed to be changed. “Overtime, Supreme Court justices began to follow one of two courses …show more content…
It is said that by adding amendments as well as changing the interpretation of the current amendments potentially changes what the founding fathers intended for the constitution. The intention to write the constitution was to help our society change but the many who argue that it should not alter do not wish for changes like women voting. “The role of federal courts, particularly the supreme court is to interpret the laws, including the United States Constitution, and render decisions in the legal cases that arise under their jurisdiction within the framework of legal precedents- no to nudge the constitution to new meanings not included in the original text” (Jacobs 3). Changing the constitution could potentially hurt our society and government today. Today’s society will be hurt by the things we change within the constitution. “The dangers to the new system of government ensured by the first president apparently did not lie within the desire of the people to improve it in the light of experience” (Vital Speeches Of The Day 4). If political powers grant the people of the United States to change things written within the constitution, the people may take advantage of that. For example, the people would want to change legal matters like drug use and alcohol consumption age. Giving the people …show more content…
The society within the United States is changing and so should we to not only help our society but to help our government grow as well. “The strength of the United States Constitution is its inheritability to change as society does. The constitution is applied as it is interpreted by judges, most importantly the nine justices of the united states supreme court and altered by amendments (...) (Evinger 4). By allowing the constitution to change as our government and society needs to, we are able to grow as a nation as time continues. If the constitution stops being amended,the constitution we could have a society that does not follow what the government says because they do not want to conform to society. Our nation has changes so much since the constitution was written including population, states (now 50), capital buildings, supreme court/white house buildings, new acts, more government spending ($3.8 trillion), political parties, religious/race freedom, and more (Hardy 9). Should our country have the same laws as over 225 years ago? Our country is at a point where change should happen because of how much our country has grown over the years. We would have no individual expression or freedom that we do today if the constitution were never amended. The basis of our political system is the right of the people to alter their constitution of government, but the constitution

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    The current Constitution allows for an amendment to be passed with ⅔ votes from both chambers of Congress and also with ¾ of the state’s approval or with ⅔ of the state legislatures calling for a convention. Sabato’s view on calling a convention is interesting in that his interpretation of a state’s petition to call a Constitutional Convention never dies as well as the visual of a light on, light off policy. Proposed amendments that a state switches it’s light on for will remain on until they reach 34 states with their lights on or until the state shuts it’s light off. This visual allows for a Convention to be called the moment the 34th state light went on, meaning a Convention could be called promptly. The one area Sabato says needs to be addressed is the lack of a standardized way of submitting applications for an amendment or convention.…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A hot debate relevant for today is the question of how the constitution is to be interpreted. When writing the constitution, the founding fathers were clearly living in an ern which entailed concerns that are different from concerns today. During the constitutional convention, men discussed debated until they agree on what should become the framework for our great nation. Because of this the constitution appears to be ambiguous on many particular issues which we face today. Are we then to address those issues in light of the context in which the constitution was written, or are we to view it as a living document that’s meaning changes with time?…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over the years, there have been many debates regarding the constitution. One common debate being whether or not the constitution is flexible enough to live through the generations. Jefferson, a founding father, has stated, “The Constitution belongs to the living and not the dead.” This statement does allude to the longevity of the Constitution, as can be demonstrated through the amendment process, the elastic clause, and judicial review. The amendment process has allowed the United States government to amend the Constitution.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Role of the Citizen in a Constitutional Democracy Despite major conflicts and social changes, the American Constitution has offered a framework of governance for over two hundred years. The Framers of the American constitution sought to create a government free of tyrannical rule—where power derives from the consent of the governed. The US constitution outlines a form of national government that aims to serve the American people by protecting their rights and liberties. The US constitution is succinct and difficult to amend; congress has only passed twenty-seven amendments since the ratification of the constitution. In this essay, I will analyze the arguments Robert Dahl’s presents in his book “How Democratic is the American Constitution”…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The US Constitution has changed 85 times and each time something is added, altered or eliminated—something from these laws, however is the strength of this and increases because government thought so. I agree with most of the constitutional document papers but some of them need to be abolished. For example, documents 51 which sets the Structure of Government and must provide the Proper Checks and Balances between the Different Departments. This needs to be changed or abolished. First, just as Locke says government needs to be more equal with people.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If the government ever became destructive, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute new government (6); there is no point to abolish our government since it has succeeded for over 200 years. Though our government may have its flaws, that are where we as the people shall alter the constitution. If the states agreed upon common ideas to amend the constitution, there should be two representatives from each state; one representing the Republican Party and the other representative from the Democratic Party. These representatives should be able to work together and should be elected by their state. By only having two representatives from each state it limits it 100 people at the convention, making it less chaotic.…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most people wouldn’t know most of the things that the Constitution says in it. It is becoming old and people are forgetting about it. Sure the Constitution is ubiquitous, but it is also unknown to some people. The U.S. Constitution is an extraordinary document.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As a document written many years ago, it has been interpreted in different ways, which makes it a living document. “The proper role of the Supreme Court, it is said, is to interpret the Constitution, not rewrite it” (Shaman, 2001). As a living document “We the People” attempt to use the words of the constitution to benefit us, both in a negative and positive manner. Past, present, and the future pose a disadvantage to the written constitution. Attempting to change the Constitution of the United States will take a long process and time, therefore interpreting the constitution makes it easier for the…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Founding Fathers Problems

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages

    While creating the foundation for the great country we know today, the Founding Fathers faced many challenges. They couldn’t change their citizens sinful ways so they tried to make a constitution that would keep the madness at bay. They also pondered on representatives to help their people be heard more effectively and efficiently. The people also must be satisfied with the government, so the Fathers had to provide them the things that a government is responsible for. Some other critical issues were conflicting interests and majority rule.…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As that becomes more developed, more enlightened, as new discoveries are made, new truths discovered and manners and opinions change, with the change of circumstances, institutions must advance also to keep pace with the times. " - Thomas Jefferson The first quote identifies one of the unanimous beliefs of the founding fathers as to the relevance and purpose of the Constitution; it was meant to be absolute. The Constitution puts a significant amount of effort into preventing the anyone, in particular the government, from having too much power. But none of that would matter if they took a step beyond the text, or in other words, disregarded the boundaries set out in the…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One example of an update that needs to be made to the Constitution is the 9th amendment. The 9th amendment states, “The enumeration in the Constitution of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.” This means that there are certain rights that…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Technology has changed, the international situation has changed, the economy has changed, and social mores have changed, all in ways that no one could have thought of when the Constitution was drafted. In fact, the people who thought of the idea of a living constitution have stated their arguments so strongly that, among people who write about constitutional law, the term "the living constitution" is hardly ever used. The Constitution is supposed to be a solid foundation, the embodiment of our most fundamental principles-that's the whole idea of having a constitution. If the Constitution is not constant, if it changes from time to time, then someone is changing it, and doing so according to his or her own ideas about what the Constitution should…

    • 203 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Bill Of Rights

    • 1463 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the fifty first letter in the Federalist Papers, written by James Madison, it states, “If men were angels, no government would be necessary. If angels were to govern men, neither external nor internal controls on government would be necessary.” James Madison was the person that proposed the Bill of Rights, and this quote really shows why he did it. The Bill of Rights is there to protect the people from the government taking away their rights as humans. It is a way to keep the government in check and from turning tyrannical.…

    • 1463 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Consequently, this leads to the idea that changing the system is the best option to benefit their beliefs. Stanford Levinson would argue that it is the peoples’ right to call for a new convention and do so. This right is endowed in some States’ constitutions but it is not declared in the United States Constitution. Levinson reasons that although the right to call for a new convention is not spelled out in the Constitution, the act would in no way be “un-American.” And if one can overcome the veneration for our founding fathers and accept the failure that is the Constitution, the will for change is not far behind.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution was drafted in 1787 and ratified by the states in 1789. In the Case of Marybury v. Madison, the Supreme Court ruled that it had powers to interpret the Constitution. According to legal resources, constitutional law deals with the fundamental principles by which the regime exercises its ascendancy. In some instances, these principles grant concrete powers to the regime, such as the puissance to tax and spend for the welfare of the population. Other times, constitutional principles act to place limits on what the regime can do, such as enjoining the apprehending of an individual without sufficient cause.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays