The foundational management philosopher for this essay is peter Drucker. Drucker is the father or inventor of self control and management by objectives concepts in management which form the basis of modern management. In this essay, management by objectives is analyzed and contrasted to the works of Blell, emotional intelligence and Jorfi, Moghadam and Jorfi impact of Emotional Intelligence on Performance of Employees.
Management by objective focuses on making management effective where the author provides that managers should be knowledgeable in the organization system. Also referred to as management by results, this concept is a process that defines objectives in an organization in order to harmonize employees with the management when it comes to organizational objectives. This concept is critical in setting goals as well as in the decision making process because it provides a measurement and comparison of employees’ performance with the set standards. In this scenario, the employees are involved in setting the goals and choosing the desirable paths in achieving those goals. Therefore the author states that the employees in this case are bound to fulfill part of their part of such responsibilities (Drucker, 2007). …show more content…
The authors illustrate the importance of emotional intelligence in growth of employees as well as their output. On the other hand, Ducker’s philosophy focuses on an all inclusive formula that brings everyone on board in holding them accountable for own set goals. While in this case there is silence on who sets the goals, Drucker is clear that all employees become stakeholders in all levels of decision making for collective growth. While the former may improve an individual’s productivity, Drucker is interested in collective productivity (Wilderom et al.,
Management by objective focuses on making management effective where the author provides that managers should be knowledgeable in the organization system. Also referred to as management by results, this concept is a process that defines objectives in an organization in order to harmonize employees with the management when it comes to organizational objectives. This concept is critical in setting goals as well as in the decision making process because it provides a measurement and comparison of employees’ performance with the set standards. In this scenario, the employees are involved in setting the goals and choosing the desirable paths in achieving those goals. Therefore the author states that the employees in this case are bound to fulfill part of their part of such responsibilities (Drucker, 2007). …show more content…
The authors illustrate the importance of emotional intelligence in growth of employees as well as their output. On the other hand, Ducker’s philosophy focuses on an all inclusive formula that brings everyone on board in holding them accountable for own set goals. While in this case there is silence on who sets the goals, Drucker is clear that all employees become stakeholders in all levels of decision making for collective growth. While the former may improve an individual’s productivity, Drucker is interested in collective productivity (Wilderom et al.,