Essay on The Foucault 's Critique Of Modern Concept Of Reason

2305 Words Oct 17th, 2014 10 Pages
Nietzche-Adorno-Foucault’s Critique of Modern Concept of Reason
The concept of reasoning is one that has spanned the history of philosophy from antediluvian days to modern history constantly being a topic of much debate and discussion. Reason has been hailed as the subject of human intelligence that gives the entire humanity a special position in nature being the epitome characteristic that defines Western philosophy and modern science.. Based on Horkheimer & Adorno, (2002, p 73), the concept of philosophy is surmised and regarded as a way of life based on reason and retrospectively this is due to the reason that in itself, forms one of the most fundamental subjects of philosophy in the entire history of humanity
With this broad description of history, it is no wonder a simple research online on what is there about reason produces hundreds of thousands of results indicating just how important and popular the concept itself is and how it attracts a lot of argumentative traction. Consequently, this serves this analytical paper to analyze the entry and study the proposed critiques of Nietzsche, Horkheimer/Adorno and Foucault level against modern reason. It subsequently explains their critiques of rationality and trying to establish what underpins their criticism and effectively how their perception impacts on our understanding of politics today.
Being an abstract construct of philosophy, reason does not have one specific definition but rather most philosophers opt to define…

Related Documents