A.1. Faction- is a group within a larger party with a common political purpose.
Ex. Discord between the military faction and the people caused an uprising.
A.2. During Washington’s presidency, there was a rise in political factions because of their different point of views. George Washington believed political factions could cause a division in the nation.
A.3. The Republican party was led by Thomas Jefferson, but the opposing party-Federalist-was led by Alexander Hamilton. Both party leaders disagreed over the power of the federal government because Hamilton wanted a strong central government while Jefferson didn’t.
A.4. I believe that the formation of political parties hurt democracy because of the continuing opposition of both parties. …show more content…
Question: President Monroe, what exactly is the Monroe Doctrine about?
Answer: Sir, the Monroe Doctrine states that (1)efforts by European nations to colonize land in the Americas, would be viewed as acts of aggression, requiring
U.S. intervention;(2) any interference by European nations with states in North or South America, would also be viewed as acts of aggression, requiring U.S. intervention;(3) the United States would not interfere with existing European colonies and;(4) the United States would not interfere with the internal affairs of European countries.
Question: President Monroe, what are your reasons for issuing this doctrine?
Answer: Sir, my reason for issuing this doctrine is that Russia is trying to colonize North America and I fear that the Holy Alliance wants to stop recognizing Latin American states as independent.
Question: President Monroe, how do you think the European Powers will react to this doctrine?
Answer: Sir, I believe some will be angered by this doctrine.
Question: President Monroe, how do you think the U.S. will react to European protests or actions?
Answer: Sir, I believe that our citizens will be worried about the protest by the Europeans.
Question: President Monroe, How will the U.S. benefit under this …show more content…
The Indian Removal Act was a policy made by Andrew Jackson to move Native Americans and provide land for the settlers.
E.3. The Supreme Court ruling on the issue of Indian removal was that they should be left alone. However, President Jackson’s response was that he was not going to enforce the court’s decision.
E.4.
All laws of the Cherokee Nation null and void
Prohibited Cherokees from conducting tribal business, contracting
Prohibited testifying against whites in court
Prohibited mining for gold
In my opinion, I believe that this document supported ethnic cleansing because the people who passed it wanted to get rid of the Native Americans.
E.5. The removal of the Cherokee to the Indian territory was called the “Trail of Tears” because of its devastating effects. The title was fitting seeing how several people died during their trek to the Indian territory.
E.6. Some of the long term effects of the Indian Removal Act of 1830 are that it led to a loss in population and culture. The present day effects of the Indian Removal Act were that Native Americans are treated as second class citizens or worse. The civil rights of Native Americans were so trampled on that they still have not recovered.
E.7.
Congressional Legislation
“Indian Removal Act in
Ex. Discord between the military faction and the people caused an uprising.
A.2. During Washington’s presidency, there was a rise in political factions because of their different point of views. George Washington believed political factions could cause a division in the nation.
A.3. The Republican party was led by Thomas Jefferson, but the opposing party-Federalist-was led by Alexander Hamilton. Both party leaders disagreed over the power of the federal government because Hamilton wanted a strong central government while Jefferson didn’t.
A.4. I believe that the formation of political parties hurt democracy because of the continuing opposition of both parties. …show more content…
Question: President Monroe, what exactly is the Monroe Doctrine about?
Answer: Sir, the Monroe Doctrine states that (1)efforts by European nations to colonize land in the Americas, would be viewed as acts of aggression, requiring
U.S. intervention;(2) any interference by European nations with states in North or South America, would also be viewed as acts of aggression, requiring U.S. intervention;(3) the United States would not interfere with existing European colonies and;(4) the United States would not interfere with the internal affairs of European countries.
Question: President Monroe, what are your reasons for issuing this doctrine?
Answer: Sir, my reason for issuing this doctrine is that Russia is trying to colonize North America and I fear that the Holy Alliance wants to stop recognizing Latin American states as independent.
Question: President Monroe, how do you think the European Powers will react to this doctrine?
Answer: Sir, I believe some will be angered by this doctrine.
Question: President Monroe, how do you think the U.S. will react to European protests or actions?
Answer: Sir, I believe that our citizens will be worried about the protest by the Europeans.
Question: President Monroe, How will the U.S. benefit under this …show more content…
The Indian Removal Act was a policy made by Andrew Jackson to move Native Americans and provide land for the settlers.
E.3. The Supreme Court ruling on the issue of Indian removal was that they should be left alone. However, President Jackson’s response was that he was not going to enforce the court’s decision.
E.4.
All laws of the Cherokee Nation null and void
Prohibited Cherokees from conducting tribal business, contracting
Prohibited testifying against whites in court
Prohibited mining for gold
In my opinion, I believe that this document supported ethnic cleansing because the people who passed it wanted to get rid of the Native Americans.
E.5. The removal of the Cherokee to the Indian territory was called the “Trail of Tears” because of its devastating effects. The title was fitting seeing how several people died during their trek to the Indian territory.
E.6. Some of the long term effects of the Indian Removal Act of 1830 are that it led to a loss in population and culture. The present day effects of the Indian Removal Act were that Native Americans are treated as second class citizens or worse. The civil rights of Native Americans were so trampled on that they still have not recovered.
E.7.
Congressional Legislation
“Indian Removal Act in