Adverse Possession Essay

Improved Essays
ADVERSE POSSESSION IN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

William Shakespeare constructs his building some 5 feet into D.H.Lawrence’s land. D.H.Lawrence knowing this, made no objection. Can Shakespeare become the owner to D.H.Lawrence’s land? This question was asked by my law school professor in a seminar. And he said “if someone answers ‘yes’ to this question then he knows the key components of Adverse Possession.” The origin of adverse possession is based both in statutory actions and in common law precepts in United States of America. In a country like United States, where all 50 states have its own law of practice and procedure, the law relating to Adverse Possession varies by jurisdiction. For example the period of limitation in California
…show more content…
If this continued for a period of time set by state law, your neighbor may be able to claim the property as his/her own. And the person who takes away the title from true owner is known as disseisor. Now the question arises, “ Will such a law not be used by wicked villains to legally steal the lands of another? A firm affirmation to this question is “No”. It’s because of the five ingredients without which a person cannot claim Adverse Possession. i. The possessor must have actually entered the property and must have exclusive possession of the property. ii. The possession must be “open and notorious”. iii. The possession must be adverse to the rightful owner and under a claim of …show more content…
Though in the outset, law of adverse possession seems to be an odd law, especially for non-lawyers, it actually serve to strengthen and “prove up” titles to land. Firstly, by limiting the time of action, title is protected from spurious lawsuits. Because there are some instances in which records are not produced but created. A person may be using the land under peaceful possession from the days of his ancestors. And suddenly some one may say ‘I am the owner and I have a 95 years old record and contest’. To avoid such circumstances limitation period is fixed. Secondly, adverse possession intends to protect the rights of the bona fide purchaser, as here the wicked villains may sell a land belonging to another and the innocent purchaser must not be vexed by such an act. Thirdly, from time immemorial, history has supported the person who utilizes the land for societies growth than a person who just remains inactive with rights over his

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    According to Pearce (2007), following the case of Kelo v. New London (2005), North Carolina lawmakers added a provision in the state’s eminent domain laws intended to limit the extent to which the state or city can seize private property. Under this provision, eminent domain can only be used to take individual parcels of land that are deemed to be blighted or dilapidated. The provision also includes a specific definition of what meets these criteria (p. 1790). This is important in Martin’s case because it precludes the government from grouping multiple properties together for urban redevelopment.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION CASE NO. COWE-14-010356 (83) Hunter Run Homeowners Association Of Broward county Plaintiff, Vs. Clement Watkins, (Pro Se) Defendant.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Traig Case Summary

    • 1799 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The issue to be dealt with from the scenario presented is whether Craig has a right to claim the objects that have been found. The key principle for lost and found objects is the principle of priority of entitlement. Priority of entitlement starts with the "true owner who has the best claim; then the finder; the landowner; and the employees of the landowner." A claim to the ownership of lost or abandoned objects depends on where the object was found and the extent to which it was attached to the ground. The landowner may however, have a better claim to the item found over the finder and this depends (depending) on where the object was found and the extent to which the object was attached to the ground.…

    • 1799 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Facts of Prime Coastal Private Real Property in Wilmington, North Carolina The non-profit company promoting coastal redevelopment under Tar Heel Family Resort is using Wilmington’s power of eminent domain and visa versa for mutual benefits. Seizure, without prior offer to you, the owner, exhibits zero attention to the owner’s interest. I agree the fact that it is (was) your (future) home means it ought to hold all definitions of home.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    After reading the Overview of Kelo v. New London Case and other eminent domain videos, it is difficult to not feel sympathy for these property owners who are heart-broken by the government’s actions. At the same time, it would be unfair to view a situation from one perspective. For property owners, having their property vanished is their worst nightmare, whether it’s for good or bad reasons. I say that to say, that no matter what the government’s intentions are for eminent domains, it is not going to be an easy process for these owners or the community. Although this may seem cruel, sometimes the government has to take action and do what is better fit for a greater amount of people.…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Kelo Case

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Issue: Does the taking of the petitioner’s properties violate the “public use” restriction in the fifth amendment’s taking clause or is the “public use” clause valid for purposes of betterment for the community as a whole. Holding: The court ruled that the petitioner’s…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    If the landowner does not want to sell, the government can file a court action to exercise eminent domain, and serves or publishes notice of the hearing as required by law. The use, and at times abuse, of this law contributes to ethical dilemmas arising, as with the legal case of The Cottonwood…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fifth Amendment Essay

    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages

    (US Const. Amend. V, sec. 3) The fifth amendment fails to protect the individual from the unjust seizure of land from the government, for there is no clause that allows for protecting one’s land if not compelled to sell. Even when given the right, the…

    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through the years, it has been unclear to many people whether or not eminent domain has been used correctly. Many people disagree, but those are the people who have been affected by it directly. The opinions on this question are mostly biased, but looking at it from an outside standpoint, eminent domain is being used correctly. The Fifth Amendment states that the government has the right to take private property if they can prove that the property is going to be used for public use.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Eminent Domain Essay

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Legislation at the Federal level does not cover eminent domain as related to all property matters. Some states have passed laws regarding eminent domain, but the definition is still abstract. (Campbell) The government should have further limitations on eminent domain. There should be specific guidelines for what is considered public use and what just compensation for the taking of private property for public use consists of for the property owner. Questions arise when private companies have government entities take private property for “public use”.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuisance can be separated into private, public and statutory nuisance. Private nuisance is “ the unreasonable use of man of his land to the detriment of his neighbour (Miller v. Jackson [1977] QB 966 (CA); 3 All ER 338) and can only be claimed by the individual affected that has an interest in the land . The potential defendants can be the creators of the nuisance, regardless of whether they are also the occupiers of the property .…

    • 1023 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the Nature of Property – Jean-Sifrein Maury In the Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen, it is stated that “property is an inviolable and sacred right…” and the current draft of the Constitution states that “the constitution guarantees the inviolability of property or a just and prior indemnity for that of which a legally established public necessity may demand the sacrifice.” This is a section of the Constitution that should be applauded. For in this statement, there lies a great and admirable protection of citizens – a protection of them from the government. By stating this as law no longer can the government take anyone’s land in the state and if they do, just compensation is required.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the Native American society, personal goods such as tools were considered yours only if you created them yourself. Even if something was owned it was considered readily replaceable. Despite their easy nature of personal goods, land was different. The land which crops were grown and the area their wigwams stood on were, in their minds, possessed by them in spite of the fact that they moved every couple of months to a new area. They also believed that their main hunting and gathering lands were theirs to claim.…

    • 1758 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Essay On Eminent Domain

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “No person …shall be…deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation” (Williams). Or so that is what the modern people of the U.S thought. Eminent domain was one of the first powers given to the government from the Fifth Amendment. Even though it was one of the first powers that was given to the government, it has become one of the most abused recently in numerous court cases. The vast majority of them end with the government winning with a rebuttal stating that no one can take property without due process of law or just compensation.…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    13. INSPECTION OF PREMISES. Lessor and Lessor's agents shall have the right at all reasonable times during the term of this Agreement and any renewal thereof to enter the Premises for the purpose of inspecting the Premises and all buildings and improvements thereon. And for the purposes of making any repairs, additions or alterations as may be deemed appropriate by Lessor for the preservation of the Premises or the building. Lessor and its agents shall further have the right to exhibit the Premises and to display the usual "for sale", "for rent" or "vacancy" signs on the Premises at any time within forty-five (45) days before the expiration of this Lease.…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays