The Ford Pinto Failure

Decent Essays
In the case of the Ford Pinto failure, I believe that the deaths involved were not justified, the companies cost/benefit analysis was highly misconstrued to work in their favor. Human lives need to have value, it is difficult to put a price on them though. In classical utilitarianism it states that the best choice is the outcome with greatest happiness without unhappiness for everyone concerned. Ford failed to look at the value of human lives in a realistic way, $200,000 for a life is absurd. For a husband, wife, mother etc. this figure is greatly underestimated. Now, look at the cost analysis with a realistic number in today’s day and age I think we would see fixing this problem would not only be for the greatest good, this would also benefit

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Cost and benefit analysis can be a good way to decide some things such as buying a car, but it is not a very good system to use when it comes to moral issues. Everyone has a different idea of what a cost and a benefit is. One person may think that when it comes to an abortion the benefit that the fetus no longer lives. That person might think it is a benefit because he/she is unable to take care of the child properly. The next person might believe that is a cost for a specific reason.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the late 1960’s Japan and Germany were producing numerous vehicles to compete against American made cars. Ford motor company wanted to produce a subcompact car to meet the threat from abroad head on so Ford came up with the Ford Pinto. These cars were made to be affordable and domestic, in order for a large quantity of Americans to be able to afford them. To accelerate product production Ford “decided to compress the normal drafting board to showroom time of about three and a half years into two” (Shaw, p. 85). After numerous crash-tests of Pinto prototypes, many cars ended up in a fiery blaze raising concerns about engineering quality.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Cost Benefit Analysis: An Ethical Critique by Steven Kelman: a. Summary: in this article the author critiques cost-benefit analysis and advocates against its use in environmental, safety, and health regulation decision making. The author begins by pointing out the similarities between cost-benefit analysis and utilitarianism. Utilitarianism’s goal is to maximize the greater good, but it has also been the subject of scrutiny. The article examined cost-benefit analysis and concluded that there will be situations where a decision will be right even though the benefit will not out way the cost, there will also be situations where is it best not to put a dollar value on non-marketed goods, and that it is not justifiable to utilize resources for…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When discussing the value of human life, people (especially those directly affected by deaths) tend to become upset. They cannot seem to agree on how to measure the value of a life. A prime example of this happened following the 9/11 incident, when many deaths required government payouts to loved ones. Someone had to determine how much to give each family—and they had to base it off of something.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    InWith the continuous dependence on health care resources, U.S. policymakers have seen an increased need for the development of sound, justifiable prioritization methods that strategically allocate critically needed, but scarce health care services and treatments. Policymakers on the Oregon Health Services Commission were tasked with this prioritization dilemma in the late 1980s, when Oregon state legislators approved expansion of its Medicaid program. In the United States, Medicaid acts as a federal/state government health insurance program for low-income individuals and persons with disabilities. At different points in time, the U.S. Federal government dictates the range of coverage that states need to abide by in order to receive federal…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    4. How might utilitarianism be used to resolve dilemma 4 (pg. 132 of Jones)? Do you agree with this resolution? Why or why not?…

    • 1308 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is the life of Beyoncé more valuable than the life of a Mcdonald’s worker? Do our lives have equal value? How exactly can the value of an individual’s life be measured? Many people contemplate the actual value of life and there are numerous opinions on how and why life should be valued. While some argue that human life is priceless, others claim that a human being is worth approximately $50,000.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Consider the principle of "innocent until proven guilty. " One side says some crimes are so horrible that we should bend the rules of burden of proof a little bit so that people like mass murderers or child rapists can't go free and hurt more people. The other side says the current burden of proof and the principle of "innocent until proven guilty" might allow many guilty people to go free, but in the long run the principle is better for society because it also reduces the odds of innocent people being convicted of these heinous crimes. Which side is using utilitarian reasoning? The answer: both sides.…

    • 129 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These figures are alarming and must be addressed to lessen the chance of future generations enduring the same…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethics Of Dumping Essay

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In an ethical manner, it is not morally right to endanger another person 's life in order to make a profit, as it creates more harms than benefits. Companies are dumping dangerous and hazardous products on overseas markets and it should be in the company’s best interest to consider the health and safety of the people and animals. Therefore, the companies acted immorally by dumping harmful products. 
 In essence, dumping refers to the procedure of exporting products that have been banned dangerous in the US, to other countries, mainly third world countries. The harms clearly outweigh the benefits, as these manufactures are knowingly dumping dangerous products available to third world countries.…

    • 1267 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    A grand Jury indicted the Ford Motor Company on charges of reckless homicide and criminal negligence that played a part to the death of three teenage girls on August 1978 in Elkhart, Indiana. They were killed in a fiery crash when their Ford Pinto was struck from the rear by a van driver on U.S Highway 33 near Goshen Indiana. Their automobile exploded and burst into flames. The Elkhart County grand Jury argued that Ford Company had previous knowledge that the fuel tank of pinto in which Judy Ulrich, 18; her sister Lynn, 16 and their cousin Donna Ulrich, 18 was hazardous. The grand jury stated that Ford Motor Company “had the legal right to warn the general public," - a legal obligation that ford failed to regulate.…

    • 1821 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Based on Ford Pinto cases, we can ask, “How utilitarian principle take an action in a matter?” To answer this question, the following step of act utilitarian approach is useful; first, identify the options available, especially on the consequences of certain actions. Second, determine the appropriate audience for selection. Third, remember that any choice is chosen, it sets an example for others, and others in the same state will be allowed in making similar selections. Fourth, making an available options will likely bring the best benefits to the right audience, taking into account the dangers and benefits.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, in the Challenger Case, although the benefits of proceeding the launch on time could produce the most utility for the greatest number of persons in the company and overall participants of the project such as fame and recognition, long term profitability, and contract with NASA, it cannot be morally right to continue with the launch even though the amount of pain was only result in a death of seven people. The reason for this is because the “best” action we could possibly perform can be seen as extreme, impractical, and oppressive. In addition, it isn’t always clear that the “best” action is always available to us. If we can clearly know that the Challenger will not fail and produce good result without negligible bad results, then that action is rational. A utilitarian would respond to this complaint by breaking subordinate rules.…

    • 1291 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Further, the fact that there have been without a doubt many innocent people put to death in our country due to these faults is horrifying (n.p.). We have many unfortunate flaws in our justice system which can lead to the mistreatment and possible execution of valued human life. Human error should never be the cause of someone 's life being taken. The only real way to keep these tragic incidents from happening, would be to abolish the death penalty…

    • 1023 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Importance Of Deontology

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages

    6.) For Kant, what is the one thing that can be taken as good without qualification? And what is a deontologist and what is important to them? The one thing that can be taken as good without qualification is “good will”.…

    • 1044 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays