The Flaws Of Capitalism In The Capital, By Karl Marx

Improved Essays
The Capital by Karl Marx examines the capitalist economic system. To Marx, while capitalism is undeniably powerful and productive it also serves to limit our ability to exercise our right to freedom, happiness, and equality. The capitalist system of economics is often highlighted as one of the prominent reasons for American prosperity. Therefore it is striking that this work takes issue with it operation. This paper will examine Marx’s ideas about the faults of capitalism.
According to Marx, the problem at the root of the capitalist system is that it contributes to the exploitation of workers. At the heart of this problem, for Marx is the fact that the means of production are owned privately by a select few. The means of production is comprised
…show more content…
In the capitalist system, there are two social classes: the proletariat and the bourgeoisie. The proletariat is the largest social group comprised of poor working class individuals that sell labor in exchange for wages. The bourgeoisie in comparison is a small group made up of wealthy individuals who buy labor from the working class. This is the relationship that has been described previously between the capitalist and the worker. The point of contention amidst the two stems from the unequal distribution of power and …show more content…
Marx specifically details how the system has come to affect the operation of the family unit. As machinery was introduced into the factory setting the wages earned by the worker decreased making it more difficult for the worker to obtain the things necessary to sustain their family. As a result, more members of the family entered into the workforce. This meant that both women and children became involved in the production of goods and thereby profits for the capitalists. Marx iterates this point as he states that “every member of the workman’s family, without distinction of age or sex. Compulsory work for the capitalist usurped the place, not only of the children’s play, but also of free labour at home within moderate limits for the support of the family” (244). As the employment statuses of these women and children changed so did their daily interactions as a

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Marx argued that the bourgeoisie controlled the means of production, wage labour and amassed majority of the wealth as a result, which equated to the power to dominate and define society. The opposing end, the proletariat, were constantly oppressed and left alienated because they maintained no power or ability to rectify their position within society. In addition, specifically within a capitalistic society, there was no opportunity for a meritocracy; so even if the proletariats were highly skilled, they remained pigeonholed with no chance for social mobility without a direct shift within the economic structure of society. When examining this multifarious relationship, Marx asserted in the Manifesto of the Communist Party, “The modern bourgeoisie society that has sprouted from the ruins of feudal society has not done away with class antagonisms. It has but established new classes, new conditions of oppression, new forms of struggle in place of the old ones” (Marx.)…

    • 1263 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Like the classical economists, he focused on the dynamic evolution of capitalism as a system, and the turbulent relationships between different classes. ”(Stanford p.54) During the Mid-nineteenth century, Marx opposed capitalism, believing “payment of profit on private investments did not reflect any particular economic function” (Stanford p.54). Marx is saying that the workers aren’t getting paid for the amount of work they put in. Capitalists were exploiting these workers and rather than sharing the wealth/profits, they were paying the workers a diminished amount (Labor Theory of Value).…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wetbacks followed people from south America and Mexico trying to illegally enter the United States. Due to their social location or, the group memberships that people have because of their location in history and society, they are subjected to conditions here in America we would never experience. Ana’s father could no longer afford to pay for tuition for her schooling so she had to be pulled from the 7th grade. In the US, school up through high school is free because with federal and state taxes we can afford to pay for free and universal primary education.…

    • 1996 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay I will explain Karl Marx’s conception of the development of the bourgeoisie, the development of the proletariat and where Marx sees this struggle leads to. I will also explain the bourgeoisie's relationship to feudalism. I will then discuss how capitalism has limited human freedom and what Herbert Marcuse thinks capitalism has done to individual humans. At the end, I will analyze Marx and Marcuse’s criticisms and I will explain my opinion on their criticisms. Karl Marx is an economist and a philosopher that writes about the bourgeoisie and the proletariats.…

    • 802 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism In Fight Club

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Capitalism, according to Marx, is a mode of production based on private ownership of the means of production. It is a system of social relations in which labour-power is commodified and the driving force of society is the accumulation of capital. Marx theorized that economic systems result in two social classes, one of which holds the power and uses it to oppress the other. In capitalism, this is the bourgeoisie, the capitalists, who own the means of production, and the proletariat who’s labour allows the system to function and is the source of the bourgeoisie’s power. As such, the social relations of production are antagonistic.…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For Marx, capitalism is defined as the ownership of the means of production and private property. The history of class struggle becomes central to his theory; he describes the polarization…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Karl Marx criticizes capitalism because of its inequality in economic infrastructure. He asserts that capitalism helps capitalists to get richer meanwhile workers get paid little. Also, he urges that capitalism eventually will collapse into communism because of its unstable economic system. He believes that when the safety measures of capitalism fail, it will cause low profit and eventually will lead to economic crisis.…

    • 63 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One of the faults with capitalism that Karl Marx discovered was the tendency for each economic agent to maximize his profits. He contended that the value added by a worker is more than the wages he earns; the difference being the profits enjoyed by the capitalist. By eliminating the capitalists altogether, his ideal economic system would be more equitable, just, and fair than unhindered capitalism without government intervention, private ownership of property, competition, and so on.…

    • 76 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx divides society into two classes, the bourgeoisie and the proletariat. The proletarians are society’s working class, and the bourgeois are those who own the land, industries, etc. that the proletarians work on. This image falls hand in hand with Marx’s argument about the power the bourgeois have over the proletarians. In this image we see a man who is merely standing in the middle doing nothing, while several men behind him work.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In recent times, there is a growing concern of wealth inequality in America. This has really drawn criticism and challenge to capitalism as the model of socioeconomic structure. Debates surrounding this issue are often traditionally addressed through two models: communism and capitalism. Karl Marx, in his work, “The Communist Manifesto,” criticizes capitalism for it’s preaching of individualism and competition, which leads to the exploitation of the working class thus resulting in further antagonization between socioeconomic classes. Marx ends his criticism by offering up the complete abandonment of the capitalist system in favor of a communistic system in which socioeconomic autonomy is in the hands of the state.…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx mentioned capitalism system in which bourgeoisie owns the means of production and the proletariat must sell their labor-time to the capitalist to survive. Marx explained that in this type of system, capitalist are the ones who have private ownership of the means of production in which they make workers produce commodities for exchange in the market. These commodities that are produced are not essentially used immediately but they are mostly used, in the view of the capitalist, to be exchanged in the market. The most important thing to these capitalists is the surplus value. They only care about how much money they are making a profit.…

    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marxistian Analysis Essay

    • 1009 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Marxian Analysis and the Realities of the Modern Economy Far from becoming a historical relic, the role of Marxian analysis in today’s economy is both predominant and relevant in modern economic thought. Although the twenty-first century does, at first glance, appear to be a different reality from Marx’s nineteenth century entirely, the core principles of Marx’s work remain relevant and useful, although some of the interpretations made by Marx do need to be modernised somewhat. The modern economy still contains oppression by a ruling class over a subsistence group, with the labour surplus thereof creating profits for the bourgeoisie. These profits are still held by significant parties and institutions, as in Marx’s time, rather than becoming…

    • 1009 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marxism in The Hunger Games If there is any perfect representation of Marxism in film it is in The Hunger Games. For this case study, I will be focusing on the first movie of the trilogy. This paper will overview the way Marxism is shown in The Hunger Games using a few examples from the movie. In this paper, I argue that The Hunger Games’ plot line has Marxism theories extremely exposed and almost blatantly exposed. Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels developed Marxism in the early 1900s.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most fundamental and important of these conflicts is that between the Bourgeoisie (those who own and control the means of production in society) and the Proletariat (those who simply sell their labor power in the market place of Capitalism)”. (Theories, 2009) One of the reasons that the philosophy of Karl Marx and Marxism is so misunderstood is the connection that society makes to…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The surplus value becomes the source of this profit. Further division of labour increases the alienation of workers in that they do not feel a sense of pride and ownership over the fruits of their labour. Marx uses the term ‘capitalist anarchy' to describe the inherent instability of the system due to constant revolutionizing of the instruments of production and its subjection to market forces. The concentration of property and wealth in the hands of a few, also leads to greater political centralization with laws being formulated in favour of the bourgeois. Marx applauded the move towards industrialization and urbanization for freeing men from the burden of traditional ties and sentiment and simplifying class antagonisms.…

    • 2286 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays